Water free anaerobic co-digestion of vegetable processing waste with cattle slurry for methane production at high total solid content

被引:53
作者
Yao, Yiqing [1 ]
Luo, Yang [1 ]
Yang, Yingxue [1 ]
Sheng, Hongmei [1 ]
Li, Xiangkai [1 ]
Li, Tian [1 ]
Song, Yuan [1 ]
Zhang, Hua [1 ]
Chen, Shuyan [1 ]
He, Wenliang [1 ]
He, Mulan [1 ]
Ren, Yubing [1 ]
Gao, Jiangli [1 ]
Wei, Yali [1 ]
An, Lizhe [1 ]
机构
[1] Lanzhou Univ, Sch Life Sci, Minist Educ, Key Lab Cell Act & Stress Adaptat, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Anaerobic co-digestion; Methane production; Vegetable processing waste; Cattle slurry; Inoculum proportion; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; ORGANIC WASTES; INOCULUM RATIO; FRUIT; SUBSTRATE; SLUDGE; PERFORMANCE; MUNICIPAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2014.06.014
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The increase of vegetable planting area lead to the large amounts of VPW (vegetable processing wastes). Effects of V% (VPW proportion) and 1% (inoculum proportion) on water free anaerobic co-digestion of VPW with CS (cattle slurry) for methane production was investigated. The results showed that the total methane production was increased from 141.2 L/kg VS (volatile solids) to 186.8 L/kg VS with V% increasing from 17% to 35%. When V%, 1% and TS% (total solids content) were 35%, 40% and 7.9%, respectively, the maximal methane production of 186.8 L/kg VS was obtained. However, the optimal conditions were 35% of V% and 30% of 1%, the methane production Was 170.8 L/kg VS, the maximal methane production was only 9.4% higher than that of the optimal conditions, the TS% of the optimal condition was 8.6% and higher than that of the maximal methane production, the reductions of TS% and VS% for this condition were 29.5% and 49.2%, respectively, and the T-80 for this condition was 42.9% shorter than that of the maximal methane production. The results indicate VPW can be co-digested with CS without water addition. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 313
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Anaerobic codigestion of municipal, farm, and industrial organic wastes:: A survey of recent literature [J].
Alatriste-Mondragon, Felipe ;
Samar, Parviz ;
Cox, Huub H. J. ;
Ahring, Birgitte K. ;
Iranpour, Reza .
WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2006, 78 (06) :607-636
[2]   Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays [J].
Angelidaki, I. ;
Alves, M. ;
Bolzonella, D. ;
Borzacconi, L. ;
Campos, J. L. ;
Guwy, A. J. ;
Kalyuzhnyi, S. ;
Jenicek, P. ;
van Lier, J. B. .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 59 (05) :927-934
[3]  
[Anonymous], P EUR SYR AN WAST WA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater
[5]  
[Anonymous], GANSU AGR SCI TECHNO
[6]   Biogas production from pear residues using sludge from a wastewater treatment plant digester. Influence of the feed delivery procedure [J].
Arhoun, B. ;
Bakkali, A. ;
El Mail, R. ;
Rodriguez-Maroto, J. M. ;
Garcia-Herruzo, F. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 127 :242-247
[7]   Mesophilic biogas production from fruit and vegetable waste in a tubular digester [J].
Bouallagui, H ;
Ben Cheikh, R ;
Marouani, L ;
Hamdi, M .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 86 (01) :85-89
[8]   Bioreactor performance in anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable wastes [J].
Bouallagui, H ;
Touhami, Y ;
Cheikh, RB ;
Hamdi, M .
PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY, 2005, 40 (3-4) :989-995
[9]   INFLUENCE OF HIGH NACL AND NH4CL SALT LEVELS ON METHANOGENIC ASSOCIATIONS [J].
DEBAERE, LA ;
DEVOCHT, M ;
VANASSCHE, P ;
VERSTRAETE, W .
WATER RESEARCH, 1984, 18 (05) :543-548
[10]   Impact of substrate to inoculum ratio in anaerobic digestion of swine slurry [J].
Gonzalez-Fernandez, Cristina ;
Garcia-Encina, Pedro A. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2009, 33 (08) :1065-1069