Patient-Reported Outcomes for Fractures of the Acetabulum: A Comparison Between Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System and Traditional Instruments

被引:8
|
作者
Schumaier, Adam P. [1 ]
Matar, Robert N. [1 ]
Ramalingam, Wendy G. [1 ]
Archdeacon, Michael T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Orthopaed & Sports Med, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
关键词
MUSCULOSKELETAL FUNCTION ASSESSMENT; COMPUTER ADAPTIVE TEST; PROMIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; ORTHOPEDICS; PERFORMANCE; SHOULDER; SF-36;
D O I
10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-01324
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: The objective of this study was to compare instruments from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) with previously validated acetabulum fracture outcome instruments. Methods: This study included adult patients presenting for routine follow-up at least 3 months after surgical treatment of an acetabulum fracture. Participants completed four different patient-reported outcomes in a randomized order: PROMIS Mobility, PROMIS Physical Function, Short Form 36 (SF-36), and Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA). Primary outcomes were the correlations between instruments, floor/ceiling effects, and survey completion time. The effects of age, education, and race on survey completion time were also evaluated. Results: Overall strong correlations were observed between PROMIS instruments and the SMFA/SF-36 (r = 0.73 to 0.86, P < 0.05) with weaker, more moderate correlations in those with >18 months of follow-up (r = 0.41 to 0.76, P < 0.05). No instruments demonstrated notable floor or ceiling effects. The PROMIS outcomes required less time to complete (PROMIS [56 to 59 seconds] than SF-36 [5 minutes 22 seconds] and SMFA [6 minutes 35 seconds]; P < 0.001). Older individuals required more time to complete the PROMIS PF (0.5 s/yr, P = 0.03), SF-36 (2.35 s/yr, P = 0.01), and SMFA (3.85 s/yr, P < 0.01). Level of education did not affect completion time; however, African Americans took significantly longer than Caucasians to complete the SMFA and SF-36 by 151 and 164 seconds (P < 0.01). Conclusion: This study supports that the PROMIS Mobility and Physical Function surveys are much more efficient instruments for evaluating patients with acetabulum fractures when compared with the SMFA and SF-36. Convergent validity of the PROMIS instruments was overall strong but weaker and more moderate in those with a long-term follow-up, and additional study is suggested for longer-term outcomes. Level of education did not influence survey completion time; however, it took markedly longer time for older individuals and African Americans to complete the SMFA and SF-36.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 78
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Is Not as Responsive as Legacy Scores in Detecting Patient Outcomes in Hip Preservation: A Systematic Review
    Jan, Kyleen
    Krivicich, Laura
    Hevesi, Mario
    Nho, Shane
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2023, 39 (03): : 838 - 850
  • [42] The Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Sleep Measurements
    Pevernagie, Dirk
    Bauters, Fre A.
    Hertegonne, Katrien
    SLEEP MEDICINE CLINICS, 2021, 16 (04) : 595 - 606
  • [43] Poststroke Disability: Association Between Sex and Patient-Reported Outcomes
    Oliveira, Lara C.
    Ponciano, Ana
    Tuozzo, Carissa
    Viswanathan, Anand
    Rost, Natalia S.
    Etherton, Mark R.
    STROKE, 2023, 54 (02) : 345 - 353
  • [44] Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Instruments: Reliability and Validity in Veterans Following Orthopedic Surgery
    Hadlandsmyth, Katherine
    Dindo, Lilian N.
    St. Marie, Barbara J.
    Wajid, Roohina
    Embree, Jennie L.
    Noiseux, Nicolas O.
    Tripp-Reimer, Toni
    Zimmerman, M. Bridget
    Rakel, Barbara A.
    EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2020, 43 (04) : 207 - 212
  • [45] Expanding the Patient's Voice in Nephrology with Patient-Reported Outcomes
    Peipert, John D.
    Hays, Ron D.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2019, 30 (04): : 530 - 532
  • [46] A Comparison of Limb Salvage Versus Amputation for Nonmetastatic Sarcomas Using Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Outcomes
    Wilke, Benjamin
    Cooper, Anna
    Scarborough, Mark
    Gibbs, Parker
    Spiguel, Andre
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2019, 27 (08) : E381 - E389
  • [47] Patient and healthcare provider views on a patient-reported outcomes portal
    Cronin, Robert M.
    Conway, Douglas
    Condon, David
    Jerome, Rebecca N.
    Byrne, Daniel W.
    Harris, Paul A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2018, 25 (11) : 1470 - 1480
  • [48] Evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test
    Beckmann, James T.
    Hung, Man
    Voss, Maren W.
    Crum, Anthony B.
    Bounsanga, Jerry
    Tyser, Andrew R.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2016, 41 (07): : 739 - U146
  • [49] Editorial Commentary: Legacy Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Are Superior to Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System for Assessing Function After Hip Arthroscopy
    Beck, Edward C.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2023, 39 (03): : 851 - 852
  • [50] Comparison of the sensitivity of patient-reported outcomes for detecting the benefit of biologics in severe asthma
    Hyland, Michael E.
    Lanario, Joseph W.
    Menzies-Gow, Andrew
    Mansur, Adel H.
    Dodd, James W.
    Fowler, Stephen J.
    Hayes, Gemma
    Jones, Rupert C.
    Masoli, Matthew
    CHRONIC RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 2021, 18