Patient-Reported Outcomes for Fractures of the Acetabulum: A Comparison Between Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System and Traditional Instruments

被引:8
|
作者
Schumaier, Adam P. [1 ]
Matar, Robert N. [1 ]
Ramalingam, Wendy G. [1 ]
Archdeacon, Michael T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Orthopaed & Sports Med, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
关键词
MUSCULOSKELETAL FUNCTION ASSESSMENT; COMPUTER ADAPTIVE TEST; PROMIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; ORTHOPEDICS; PERFORMANCE; SHOULDER; SF-36;
D O I
10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-01324
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: The objective of this study was to compare instruments from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) with previously validated acetabulum fracture outcome instruments. Methods: This study included adult patients presenting for routine follow-up at least 3 months after surgical treatment of an acetabulum fracture. Participants completed four different patient-reported outcomes in a randomized order: PROMIS Mobility, PROMIS Physical Function, Short Form 36 (SF-36), and Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA). Primary outcomes were the correlations between instruments, floor/ceiling effects, and survey completion time. The effects of age, education, and race on survey completion time were also evaluated. Results: Overall strong correlations were observed between PROMIS instruments and the SMFA/SF-36 (r = 0.73 to 0.86, P < 0.05) with weaker, more moderate correlations in those with >18 months of follow-up (r = 0.41 to 0.76, P < 0.05). No instruments demonstrated notable floor or ceiling effects. The PROMIS outcomes required less time to complete (PROMIS [56 to 59 seconds] than SF-36 [5 minutes 22 seconds] and SMFA [6 minutes 35 seconds]; P < 0.001). Older individuals required more time to complete the PROMIS PF (0.5 s/yr, P = 0.03), SF-36 (2.35 s/yr, P = 0.01), and SMFA (3.85 s/yr, P < 0.01). Level of education did not affect completion time; however, African Americans took significantly longer than Caucasians to complete the SMFA and SF-36 by 151 and 164 seconds (P < 0.01). Conclusion: This study supports that the PROMIS Mobility and Physical Function surveys are much more efficient instruments for evaluating patients with acetabulum fractures when compared with the SMFA and SF-36. Convergent validity of the PROMIS instruments was overall strong but weaker and more moderate in those with a long-term follow-up, and additional study is suggested for longer-term outcomes. Level of education did not influence survey completion time; however, it took markedly longer time for older individuals and African Americans to complete the SMFA and SF-36.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 78
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Relationship Between the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System and Traditional Patient-Reported Outcomes for Osteoarthritis
    Padilla, Jorge A.
    Rudy, Hayeem L.
    Gabor, Jonathan A.
    Friedlander, Scott
    Iorio, Richard
    Karia, Raj J.
    Slover, James D.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2019, 34 (02): : 265 - 272
  • [2] Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Tools for Collecting Patient-Reported Outcomes in Children With Juvenile Arthritis
    Brandon, Timothy G.
    Becker, Brandon D.
    Bevans, Katherine B.
    Weiss, Pamela F.
    ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2017, 69 (03) : 393 - 402
  • [3] Patient-Reported Outcomes in Orthopaedics
    Christensen, Daniel L.
    Dickens, Jonathan F.
    Freedman, Brett
    Mauntel, Timothy
    Owens, Brett D.
    Potter, Benjamin K.
    Provencher, Matthew
    Tokish, John M.
    Waterman, Brian R.
    Antosh, Ivan
    Bellamy, Jaime
    Cameron, Kenneth L.
    Cook, Karon F.
    Eckel, Tobin T.
    Eichinger, Josef K.
    Garcia, EStephan J.
    Helgeson, Melvin D.
    Joyner, Patrick W.
    Kang, Daniel G.
    Kilcoyne, Kelly G.
    Krueger, Chad A.
    LeClere, Lance E.
    Li, Xinning
    Martin, Kevin D.
    McCallum, Jeremy R.
    McDonald, Lucas S.
    Ortiz, Dionisio, III
    Pallis, Mark P.
    Parada, Stephen A.
    Patzkowski, Jeanne C.
    Posner, Matthew A.
    Rivera, Jessica C.
    Robins, R. Judd
    Rothrock, Nan
    Schmitz, Matthew R.
    Slabaugh, Mark
    Song, Daniel J.
    Stinner, Daniel J.
    Tintle, Scott M.
    Tucker, Christopher J.
    Waltz, Robert A.
    Wilson, Kevin
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2018, 100 (05): : 436 - 442
  • [4] Patient-Reported Outcomes in Foot and Ankle Surgery
    Hunt, Kenneth J.
    Lakey, Eric
    ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 49 (02) : 277 - +
  • [5] Correlation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores with legacy patient-reported outcome scores in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair
    Patterson, Brendan M.
    Orvets, Nathan D.
    Aleem, Alexander W.
    Keener, Jay D.
    Calfee, Ryan P.
    Nixon, Devon C.
    Chamberlain, Aaron M.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2018, 27 (06) : S17 - S23
  • [6] Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Versus Legacy Instruments Are They Ready for Prime Time?
    Bykerk, Vivian P.
    RHEUMATIC DISEASE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2019, 45 (02) : 211 - +
  • [7] Patient-Reported Outcomes and Fibromyalgia
    Williams, David A.
    Kratz, Anna L.
    RHEUMATIC DISEASE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2016, 42 (02) : 317 - +
  • [8] Integrating patient-reported outcomes
    McKenna, SP
    Doward, LC
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2004, 7 : 9 - 12
  • [9] Patient-reported Outcomes in Arthrogryposis
    Wall, Lindley B.
    Vuillerman, Carley
    Miller, Patricia E.
    Bae, Donald S.
    Goldfarb, Charles A.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2020, 40 (07) : 357 - 360
  • [10] Patient-Reported Outcomes of Cirrhosis
    Kanwal, Fasiha
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 11 (09) : 1043 - 1045