CFD analyses on the water entry process of a freefall lifeboat

被引:43
作者
Huang, Luofeng [1 ]
Tavakoli, Sasan [2 ]
Li, Minghao [3 ]
Dolatshah, Azam [2 ,4 ]
Pena, Blanca [1 ]
Ding, Boyin [5 ]
Dashtimanesh, Abbas [6 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Mech Engn, London, England
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Infrastruct Engn, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Mech & Maritime Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Swinburne Univ Technol, Dept Mech & Prod Design Engn, Hawthorn, Vic, Australia
[5] Univ Adelaide, Sch Mech Engn, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[6] Tallinn Univ Technol, Estonian Maritime Acad, Tallinn, Estonia
关键词
Lifeboat; Freefall; Water entry; Pressure impact; Motion; Computational fluid dynamics; FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION; NUMERICAL WAVE TANK; ANALYTICAL-MODELS; IMPACT; WEDGE; SURFACE; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109115
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
The launch of lifeboats is commonly completed through freefall dropping from a considerable height, where the lifeboat is released from an inclined skid so that it can obtain a forward speed after being launched. The drop is followed by a water entry process that can induce high impact forces on the hull, which gives a significant risk of structural damages. Ascertaining the water entry impact is therefore a key step of lifeboat design; however, conventional methods have linear assumptions and assess the water impact following a quasi-static manner, which causes these methods to be not fully accurate and ignore some important details. To address this gap, this work developed a model based on Computational Fluid Dynamics to holistically simulate and analyse the process. An overset mesh technique was incorporated to reproduce the entire series of drop, water entry and resurfacing, in which the pressure distribution on the whole hull was obtained and recorded with a sampling frequency of 1000 Hz to ensure the peak impacts can be captured. Full-scale measurements were used to confirm the accuracy of the present computational model. Subsequently, a systematic series of simulations were performed to investigate how the water entry process is influenced by the inclined angle and height at which the lifeboat is dropped. The results show that a higher dropping angle can reduce the pressure impacts, but the dropping angle also dictates the lifeboat's motion pattern during the water entry. It was demonstrated that the best dropping angle is around 70 degrees for the investigated case, since an either too low or too high dropping angle would cause the lifeboat to appear in an undesirable after-launch status. This indicates the great importance to assess the optimal dropping angle for every potential freefall lifeboat launch, and the present work proved an effective approach to perform the task.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [21] An overset mesh based multiphase flow solver for water entry problems
    Ma, Z. H.
    Qian, L.
    Martinez-Ferrer, P. J.
    Causon, D. M.
    Mingham, C. G.
    Bai, W.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 2018, 172 : 689 - 705
  • [22] Malalasekera W., 2007, An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Finite Volume Method
  • [23] Mei XM, 1999, APPL OCEAN RES, V21, P1
  • [24] Menter F.R., 1993, AIAA PAPER, P93
  • [25] Immersed boundary methods
    Mittal, R
    Iaccarino, G
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2005, 37 : 239 - 261
  • [26] Paterson E.G., 2003, IIHR REPORT, V432
  • [27] Numerical analysis of a leading edge tubercle hydrofoil in turbulent regime
    Pena, Blanca
    Muk-Pavic, Ema
    Thomas, Giles
    Fitzsimmons, Patrick
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2019, 878 : 292 - 305
  • [28] Structural response analysis of slamming impact on free fall lifeboats
    Ringsberg, Jonas W.
    Heggelund, Svein Erling
    Lara, Paul
    Jang, Beom-Seon
    Hirdaris, Spyros E.
    [J]. MARINE STRUCTURES, 2017, 54 : 112 - 126
  • [29] Roy A.S., 2019, INT J RECENT TECHNOL, V8
  • [30] The influence of gravity on the performance of planing vessels in calm water
    Sun, Hui
    Faltinsen, Odd M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MATHEMATICS, 2007, 58 (1-4) : 91 - 107