To Crowdfund Research, Scientists Must Build an Audience for Their Work

被引:44
作者
Byrnes, Jarrett E. K. [1 ,2 ]
Ranganathan, Jai [2 ]
Walker, Barbara L. E. [3 ]
Faulkes, Zen [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Biol, Boston, MA 02125 USA
[2] Natl Ctr Ecol Anal & Synth, Santa Barbara, CA 93101 USA
[3] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Inst Social Behav & Econ Res, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[4] Univ Texas Pan Amer, Dept Biol, Edinburg, TX 78539 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT; SCIENCE COMMUNICATION; PERSPECTIVES; INCENTIVES; CONTEXTS; TIME;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0110329
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
As rates of traditional sources of scientific funding decline, scientists have become increasingly interested in crowdfunding as a means of bringing in new money for research. In fields where crowdfunding has become a major venue for fundraising such as the arts and technology, building an audience for one's work is key for successful crowdfunding. For science, to what extent does audience building, via engagement and outreach, increase a scientist's abilities to bring in money via crowdfunding? Here we report on an analysis of the #SciFund Challenge, a crowdfunding experiment in which 159 scientists attempted to crowdfund their research. Using data gathered from a survey of participants, internet metrics, and logs of project donations, we find that public engagement is the key to crowdfunding success. Building an audience or "fanbase'' and actively engaging with that audience as well as seeking to broaden the reach of one's audience indirectly increases levels of funding. Audience size and effort interact to bring in more people to view a scientist's project proposal, leading to funding. We discuss how projects capable of raising levels of funds commensurate with traditional funding agencies will need to incorporate direct involvement of the public with science. We suggest that if scientists and research institutions wish to tap this new source of funds, they will need to encourage and reward activities that allow scientists to engage with the public.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Community Engagement in Research: Frameworks for Education and Peer Review [J].
Ahmed, Syed M. ;
Palermo, Ann-Gel S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 100 (08) :1380-1387
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, WALL STREET J
[3]  
[Anonymous], COMMUNICATION
[4]  
[Anonymous], SCIFUND SUCCESS SOCI
[5]  
[Anonymous], SCIFUND ROUND 2 SUCC
[6]  
[Anonymous], RES DEV FY 2013
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1989, GEN LINEAR MODELS 2
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2007, RISING GATHERING STO
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2012, DIM FUND RIS EXP TRE
[10]  
[Anonymous], AMANDA PALMER BUILT