Confidence guides spontaneous cognitive offloading

被引:59
作者
Boldt, Annika [1 ]
Gilbert, Sam J. [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Inst Cognit Neurosci, London, England
基金
英国惠康基金; 英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Cognitive offloading; Reminders; Delayed intentions; Prospective memory; Metacognition; Confidence; Metamemory; STRATEGIC USE; MEMORY; METACOGNITION; REMINDERS; ADULTS; TASK; JUDGMENTS; ATTENTION; KNOWLEDGE; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1186/s41235-019-0195-y
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Background Cognitive offloading is the use of physical action to reduce the cognitive demands of a task. Everyday memory relies heavily on this practice; for example, when we write down to-be-remembered information or use diaries, alerts, and reminders to trigger delayed intentions. A key goal of recent research has been to investigate the processes that trigger cognitive offloading. This research has demonstrated that individuals decide whether or not to offload based on a potentially erroneous metacognitive evaluation of their mental abilities. Therefore, improving the accuracy of metacognitive evaluations may help to optimise offloading behaviour. However, previous studies typically measure participants' use of an explicitly instructed offloading strategy, in contrast to everyday life where offloading strategies must often be generated spontaneously. Results We administered a computer-based task requiring participants to remember delayed intentions. One group of participants was explicitly instructed on a method for setting external reminders; another was not. The latter group spontaneously set reminders but did so less often than the instructed group. Offloading improved performance in both groups. Crucially, metacognition (confidence in unaided memory ability) guided both instructed and spontaneous offloading: Participants in both groups set more reminders when they were less confident (regardless of actual memory ability). Conclusions These results show that the link between metacognition and cognitive offloading holds even when offloading strategies need to be spontaneously generated. Thus, metacognitive interventions are potentially able to alter offloading behaviour, without requiring offloading strategies to be explicitly instructed.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 57 条
[11]   A hand full of numbers: a role for offloading in arithmetics learning? [J].
Costa, Annelise Julio ;
Lopes Silva, Julia Beatriz ;
Chagas, Pedro Pinheiro ;
Krinzinger, Helga ;
Lonneman, Jan ;
Willmes, Klaus ;
Wood, Guilherme ;
Haase, Vitor Geraldi .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 2
[12]   Striatal activations signal prediction errors on confidence in the absence of external feedback [J].
Daniel, Reka ;
Pollmann, Stefan .
NEUROIMAGE, 2012, 59 (04) :3457-3467
[13]   Use of memory compensation strategies is related to psychosocial and health indicators [J].
de Frias, CM ;
Dixon, RA ;
Bäckman, L .
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2003, 58 (01) :P12-P22
[14]   Toward a Metacognitive Account of Cognitive Offloading [J].
Dunn, Timothy L. ;
Risko, Evan F. .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2016, 40 (05) :1080-1127
[15]   NORMAL AGING AND PROSPECTIVE MEMORY [J].
EINSTEIN, GO ;
MCDANIEL, MA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1990, 16 (04) :717-726
[16]   Executive attention and metacognitive regulation [J].
Fernandez-Duque, D ;
Baird, JA ;
Posner, MI .
CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2000, 9 (02) :288-307
[17]  
Finley J. R., 2018, Memory and technology. How we use information in the brain and the world, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99169-6, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-99169-6]
[18]   The assessment and rehabilitation of prospective memory problems in people with neurological disorders: A review [J].
Fish, Jessica ;
Wilson, Barbara A. ;
Manly, Tom .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL REHABILITATION, 2010, 20 (02) :161-179
[19]   The efficacy of prospective memory rehabilitation plus metacognitive skills training for adults with traumatic brain injury: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial [J].
Fleming, Jennifer ;
Ownsworth, Tamara ;
Doig, Emmah ;
Hutton, Lauren ;
Griffin, Janelle ;
Kendall, Melissa ;
Shum, David H. K. .
TRIALS, 2017, 18
[20]   Self-Evaluation of Decision-Making: A General Bayesian Framework for Metacognitive Computation [J].
Fleming, Stephen M. ;
Daw, Nathaniel D. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2017, 124 (01) :91-114