Comparison of transvaginal digital examination with intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position before instrumental delivery

被引:176
作者
Akmal, S
Kametas, N
Tsoi, E
Hargreaves, C
Nicolaides, KH
机构
[1] Kings Coll Hosp London, Sch Med, Harris Birthright Res Ctr Fetal Med, London SE5 8RX, England
[2] King Georges Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Ilford, Essex, England
关键词
fetal position; instrumental delivery; ultrasound;
D O I
10.1002/uog.103
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate the accuracy of intrapartum transvaginal digital examination in defining the position of the fetal bead before instrumental delivery. Patients and Methods In 64 singleton pregnancies undergoing instrumental delivery the fetal bead position was determined by transvaginal digital examination by the attending obstetrician. Immediately after or before the clinical examination, the fetal bead position was determined by transabdominal ultrasound by a trained sonographer who was not aware of the clinical findings. The digital examination was considered to be correct if the fetal bead position was within +/- 45degrees of the ultrasound finding. The accuracy of the digital examination was examined in relation to maternal and fetal characteristics. Results Digital examination failed to define the correct fetal bead position in 17 (26.6%) cases. In 12 of 17 (70.6%) errors the difference was greater than or equal to90degrees and in five (29.4%) the difference was between 45degrees and 90degrees. The accuracy of vaginal digital examination was 83% for occiput-anterior and 54% for occiput-lateral + occiput-posterior positions. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated significant independent contributions in explaining the variance in the accuracy of vaginal examination for the station of the fetal bead, the position of the fetal head and the experience of the examining obstetrician. Conclusions Digital examination during instrumental delivery fails to identify the correct fetal bead position in about one quarter of cases. Copyright (C) 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 440
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Akmal S, 2002, J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, V12, P172, DOI 10.1080/713605646
  • [2] IMPORTANCE OF FLEXION IN VACUUM EXTRACTOR DELIVERY
    BIRD, GC
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1976, 83 (03): : 194 - 200
  • [3] Neonatal subgaleal haematoma: Associated risk factors, complications and outcome
    Chadwick, LM
    Pemberton, PJ
    Kurinczuk, JJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 1996, 32 (03) : 228 - 232
  • [4] THE OBSTETRIC VACUUM EXTRACTOR IS THE INSTRUMENT OF 1ST CHOICE FOR OPERATIVE VAGINAL DELIVERY
    CHALMERS, JA
    CHALMERS, I
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1989, 96 (05): : 505 - 506
  • [5] Choice and instrumental delivery
    Drife, JO
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1996, 103 (07): : 608 - 611
  • [6] Preventing perineal trauma during childbirth: A systematic review
    Eason, E
    Labrecque, M
    Wells, G
    Feldman, P
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 95 (03) : 464 - 471
  • [7] The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes
    Gardella, C
    Taylor, M
    Benedetti, T
    Hitti, J
    Critchlow, C
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (04) : 896 - 902
  • [8] A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE-STUDY COMPARING THE NEW VACUUM EXTRACTOR POLICY WITH FORCEPS DELIVERY
    JOHANSON, RB
    RICE, C
    DOYLE, M
    ARTHUR, J
    ANYANWU, L
    IBRAHIM, J
    WARWICK, A
    REDMAN, CWE
    OBRIEN, PMS
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1993, 100 (06): : 524 - 530
  • [9] JOHANSON RB, 2000, COCHRANE LIB
  • [10] Kreiser D, 2001, J Matern Fetal Med, V10, P283, DOI 10.1080/714904341