Failure of Traditional Risk Factors to Adequately Predict Cardiovascular Events in Older Populations

被引:24
作者
Dalton, Jarrod E. [1 ,2 ]
Rothberg, Michael B. [1 ,3 ]
Dawson, Neal, V [4 ,5 ]
Krieger, Nikolas, I [2 ]
Zidar, David A. [6 ,7 ]
Perzynski, Adam T. [5 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Cleveland Clin, Lerner Coll Med, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Lerner Res Inst, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Cleveland Clin, Med Inst, Ctr Value Based Care Res, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[4] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Populat & Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[5] Case Western Reserve Univ MetroHlth, Ctr Healthcare Res & Policy, Cleveland, OH USA
[6] Univ Hosp Cleveland, Harrington Heart & Vasc Inst, Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[7] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Cleveland, OH USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
model validation; older adults; risk heterogeneity; risk prediction; FRAILTY; DISEASE; CHOLESTEROL; METAANALYSIS; PREVENTION; GUIDELINES; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1111/jgs.16329
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Accurate assessment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk across heterogeneous populations is needed for effective primary prevention. Little is known about the performance of standard cardiovascular risk factors in older adults. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the performance of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE) risk model, as well as the underlying cardiovascular risk factors, among adults older than 65 years. DESIGN AND SETTING Retrospective cohort derived from a regional referral system's electronic medical records. PARTICIPANTS A total of 25 349 patients who were 65 years or older at study baseline (date of the first outpatient lipid panel taken between 2007 and 2010). MEASUREMENTS Exposures of interest were traditional cardiovascular risk factors, as defined by inclusion in the PCE model. The primary outcome was major ASCVD events, defined as a composite of myocardial infarctions, stroke, and cardiovascular death. RESULTS The PCE and internally estimated models produced similar risk distributions for white men aged 65 to 74 years. For all other groups, PCE predictions were generally lower than those of the internal models, particularly for African Americans. Discrimination of the PCE was poor for all age groups, with concordance index (95% confidence interval) estimates of 0.62 (0.60-0.64), 0.56 (0.54-0.57), and 0.52 (0.49-0.54) among patients aged 65 to 74, 75 to 84, and 85 years and older, respectively. Reestimating relationships within these age groups resulted in better calibration but negligible improvements in discrimination. Blood pressure, total cholesterol, and diabetes either were not associated at all or had inverse associations in the older age groups. CONCLUSION Traditional clinical risk factors for cardiovascular disease failed to accurately characterize risk in a contemporary population of Medicare-aged patients. Among those aged 85 years and older, some traditional risk factors were not associated with ASCVD events. Better risk models are needed to appropriately inform treatment decision making for the growing population of older adults.
引用
收藏
页码:754 / 761
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins
    Baigent, C
    Keech, A
    Kearney, PM
    Blackwell, L
    Buck, G
    Pollicino, C
    Kirby, A
    Sourjina, T
    Peto, R
    Collins, R
    Simes, J
    [J]. LANCET, 2005, 366 (9493) : 1267 - 1278
  • [2] Chapman G.B., 2003, Decision making in health care: Theories, psychology and applications
  • [3] Calibration of the Pooled Cohort Equations for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease An Update
    Cook, Nancy R.
    Ridker, Paul M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 165 (11) : 786 - +
  • [4] Accuracy of Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Varies by Neighborhood Socioeconomic Position A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Dalton, Jarrod E.
    Perzynski, Adam T.
    Zidar, David A.
    Rothberg, Michael B.
    Coulton, Claudia J.
    Milinovich, Alex T.
    Einstadter, Douglas
    Karichu, James K.
    Dawson, Neal V.
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 167 (07) : 456 - +
  • [5] CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY - THE ARCHITECTURE OF CLINICAL RESEARCH
    FEINSTEIN, AR
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1995, 14 (11) : 1263 - 1263
  • [6] Frailty in older adults: Evidence for a phenotype
    Fried, LP
    Tangen, CM
    Walston, J
    Newman, AB
    Hirsch, C
    Gottdiener, J
    Seeman, T
    Tracy, R
    Kop, WJ
    Burke, G
    McBurnie, MA
    [J]. JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES A-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2001, 56 (03): : M146 - M156
  • [7] 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines
    Goff, David C., Jr.
    Lloyd-Jones, Donald M.
    Bennett, Glen
    Coady, Sean
    D'Agostino, Ralph B., Sr.
    Gibbons, Raymond
    Greenland, Philip
    Lackland, Daniel T.
    Levy, Daniel
    O'Donnell, Christopher J.
    Robinson, Jennifer G.
    Schwartz, J. Sanford
    Shero, Susan T.
    Smith, Sidney C., Jr.
    Sorlie, Paul
    Stone, Neil J.
    Wilson, Peter W. F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 63 (25) : 2935 - 2959
  • [8] Grundy SM, 2019, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V73, pE285, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.003
  • [9] Harris T B, 1991, J Aging Health, V3, P262, DOI 10.1177/089826439100300209
  • [10] FRAILTY, COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT AND MORTALITY AMONG THE OLDEST OLD
    Jacobs, J. M.
    Cohen, A.
    Ein-Mor, E.
    Maaravi, Y.
    Stessman, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUTRITION HEALTH & AGING, 2011, 15 (08) : 678 - 682