Knowledge of the legislation governing proxy consent to treatment and research

被引:22
作者
Bravo, G
Pâquet, M
Dubois, MF
机构
[1] Univ Sherbrooke, Geriatr Inst, Res Ctr Aging, Sherbrooke, PQ J1H 4C4, Canada
[2] Univ Sherbrooke, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Sherbrooke, PQ J1H 4C4, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1136/jme.29.1.44
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To assess the knowledge of four groups of individuals regarding who is legally authorised to consent to health care or research involving older patients. Design: A provincewide postal survey. Setting: Province of Quebec, Canada. Participants: Three hundred older adults, 434 informal caregivers of cognitively impaired individuals, 98 researchers in aging and 136 members of research ethics boards (REBs). Measurements: Knowledge was assessed through a pretested postal questionnaire comprising five vignettes that describe hypothetical situations involving an older adult who requires medical care or is solicited for research. The respondent had to identify the person who is legally authorised to provide consent. Results: Nearly 80% of all respondents provided the correct answer when the hypothetical scenario depicted a person who was competent to consent or incompetent but legally represented. Knowledge was worse (from 2% among older adults to 44% among REB members) for the scenario describing a research situation that involved an incompetent adult without a legal guardian. Conclusion: The observed lack of knowledge raises doubts about the ability of current legislation to truly protect the rights of older adults with diminished decision making capacity. It points to the need for educational programmes aimed at increasing public awareness of the legislation put in place for those requiring special protection.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 50
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
*AGS ETH RES COMM, 2000, J AM GERIATR SOC, V49, P1120
[2]  
APPELBAUM PS, 1995, NEW ENGL J MED, V319, P1635
[3]   Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals [J].
Asch, DA ;
Jedrziewski, MK ;
Christakis, NA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 50 (10) :1129-1136
[4]   GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS KNOWLEDGE AND USE OF LIVING WILLS [J].
ASHBY, M ;
WAKEFIELD, M ;
BEILBY, J .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 310 (6974) :230-230
[5]  
Bowker L, 1998, J ROY COLL PHYS LOND, V32, P351
[6]   Ethical and human-rights issues in research on mental disorders that may affect decision-making capacity [J].
Capron, AM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (18) :1430-1434
[7]  
Dillman D.A., 1978, MAIL TELEPHONE SURVE
[8]  
Dillman D.A., 2011, Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method
[9]   LEGAL JUDGMENTS AND INFORMED CONSENT IN GERIATRIC RESEARCH [J].
DUBLER, NN .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1987, 35 (06) :545-549
[10]   What makes clinical research ethical? [J].
Emanuel, EJ ;
Wendler, D ;
Grady, C .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 283 (20) :2701-2711