Estimation of Wildlife Hazard Levels Using Interspecies Correlation Models and Standard Laboratory Rodent Toxicity Data

被引:13
作者
Awkerman, Jill A. [1 ]
Raimondo, Sandy [1 ]
Barron, Mace G. [1 ]
机构
[1] US EPA, Gulf Ecol Div, Gulf Breeze, FL 32561 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH-PART A-CURRENT ISSUES | 2009年 / 72卷 / 24期
关键词
SPECIES SENSITIVITY DISTRIBUTIONS; STRAIN;
D O I
10.1080/15287390903232491
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Toxicity data from laboratory rodents are widely available and frequently used in human health assessments as animal model data. This study explores the possibility of using single rodent acute toxicity values to predict chemical toxicity to a diversity of wildlife species and estimate hazard levels from modeled species sensitivity distributions (SSD). Interspecies correlation estimation (ICE) models predict toxicity values for untested species using the sensitivity relationship between measured toxicity values of two species. Predicted toxicity values can subsequently populate SSD for application in ecological risk assessments. Laboratory mouse and rat toxicity values were used to estimate toxicity to wildlife and the predicted values then were used to derive SSD hazard dose levels. Toxicity values were predicted within fivefold of measured toxicity values for 78% of ICE models using laboratory rat or mouse toxicity as a surrogate value. Hazard dose levels (HD5) were within fivefold of measured estimates for 72% of SSD developed using laboratory rodent ICE models. Rodents were most often in the least sensitive quartile of species sensitivity distributions, and therefore toxicity values alone may not adequately represent the toxicity to many species of concern without appropriate safety or assessment factors. Laboratory rodent toxicity data offer an additional source of information that can be used to predict hazard levels for wildlife species, and thus offer a starting point for both health and ecological risk assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:1604 / 1609
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions [J].
Aldenberg, T ;
Jaworska, JS .
ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2000, 46 (01) :1-18
[2]   Development of species sensitivity distributions for wildlife using interspecies toxicity correlation models [J].
Awkerman, Jill A. ;
Raimondo, Sandy ;
Barron, Mace G. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 42 (09) :3447-3452
[3]   DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF A SPECIES SENSITIVITY DISTRIBUTION FOR TEMPERATURE-INDUCED MORTALITY IN THE AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT [J].
de Vries, Pepijn ;
Tamis, Jacqueline E. ;
Murk, Albertinka J. ;
Smit, Mathijs G. D. .
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2008, 27 (12) :2591-2598
[4]  
de Zwart D, 2002, ENVIRON ECOL RISK AS, P133
[5]   Comparison of species sensitivity distributions derived from interspecies correlation models to distributions used to derive water quality criteria [J].
Dyer, Scott D. ;
Versteeg, Donald J. ;
Belanger, Scott E. ;
Chaney, Joel G. ;
Raimondo, Sandy ;
Barron, Mace G. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 42 (08) :3076-3083
[6]   Interspecies correlation estimates predict protective environmental concentrations [J].
Dyer, SD ;
Versteeg, DJ ;
Belanger, SE ;
Chaney, JG ;
Mayer, FL .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 40 (09) :3102-3111
[7]   Bayesian and time-independent species sensitivity distributions for risk assessment of chemicals [J].
Grist, EPM ;
O'Hagan, A ;
Crane, M ;
Sorokin, N ;
Sims, I ;
Whitehouse, P .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 40 (01) :395-401
[8]  
Insightful Corporation, 2001, S PLUS PROGR GUID
[9]   Strain as a determinant factor in the differential responsiveness of rats to chemicals [J].
Kacew, S ;
Ruben, Z ;
McConnell, RF .
TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY, 1995, 23 (06) :701-714
[10]  
Kacew S, 1996, J TOXICOL ENV HEALTH, V47, P1