Clinical results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in diabetic and non- diabetic patients

被引:6
|
作者
Takahashi, Ryosuke [1 ]
Kajita, Yukihiro [1 ,2 ]
Harada, Yohei [2 ]
Iwahori, Yusuke [2 ]
Deie, Masataka [2 ]
机构
[1] Ichinomiya Nishi Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 1 Kaimei Hira, Ichinomiya, Aichi 4801195, Japan
[2] Aichi Med Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan
关键词
FROZEN SHOULDER; ADHESIVE CAPSULITIS; RISK-FACTORS; STIFFNESS; MELLITUS; OUTCOMES; RELEASE; TENDONS; TEARS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jos.2020.03.013
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Although the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) have been reported, few studies have focused on diabetic patients. We investigated and compared the clinical results of ARCR in patients with and without diabetes. Methods: This retrospective study involved 195 consecutive patients who underwent ARCR from 2015 to 2018 in our hospital. Twenty-seven and 168 shoulders were assigned to diabetes and non-diabetes groups, respectively. Diabetic patients with poor control were preoperatively hospitalized for perioperative diabetic control. We evaluated range of motion (ROM), Japanese Orthopaedic Association shoulder (JOA) score, Constant Shoulder Score, and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score preoperatively and at 6 months and 1 year post-ARCR. Rates of rotator cuff retear 1 year post-ARCR and preoperative and postoperative stiff shoulder were also evaluated. We compared the results between groups and analyzed them statistically. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Preoperative ROM, JOA score, Constant Shoulder Score and UCLA scores showed significant improvement at post-ARCR in both groups (p < 0.05). On comparing the groups, although preoperative JOA score and Constant Shoulder Score were significantly lower in diabetes group than in non-diabetes group (diabetic/non-diabetic group; 60.0/65.3 for JOA score; p = 0.003, 59.7/64.2 for Constant Shoulder Score; p = 0.003), there was no significant difference postoperatively (6 months post-ARCR; 88.0/89.7 for JOA score; p = 0.783, 88.1/88.6 for Constant Shoulder Score; p = 0.597,1 year post-ARCR; 96.7/95.4 for JOA score; p = 0.238, 96.6/95.4 for Constant Shoulder Score; p = 0.248). Furthermore, preoperative and postoperative stiff shoulder and retear rates were not significantly different between groups (p = 0.152, p = 0.344, p = 0.347, and p = 0.563, respectively). Conclusion: Diabetic patients showed comparable clinical results with non-diabetic patients post-ARCR. Perioperative diabetic control may be recommended for preoperatively uncontrolled diabetic patients. ? 2020 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Background: Although the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) have been reported, few studies have focused on diabetic patients. We investigated and compared the clinical results of ARCR in patients with and without diabetes. Methods: This retrospective study involved 195 consecutive patients who underwent ARCR from 2015 to 2018 in our hospital. Twenty-seven and 168 shoulders were assigned to diabetes and non-diabetes groups, respectively. Diabetic patients with poor control were preoperatively hospitalized for perioperative diabetic control. We evaluated range of motion (ROM), Japanese Orthopaedic Association shoulder (JOA) score, Constant Shoulder Score, and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score preoperatively and at 6 months and 1 year post-ARCR. Rates of rotator cuff retear 1 year post-ARCR and preoperative and postoperative stiff shoulder were also evaluated. We compared the results between groups and analyzed them statistically. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Preoperative ROM, JOA score, Constant Shoulder Score and UCLA scores showed significant improvement at post-ARCR in both groups (p < 0.05). On comparing the groups, although preoperative JOA score and Constant Shoulder Score were significantly lower in diabetes group than in non-diabetes group (diabetic/non-diabetic group; 60.0/65.3 for JOA score; p = 0.003, 59.7/64.2 for Constant Shoulder Score; p = 0.003), there was no significant difference postoperatively (6 months post-ARCR; 88.0/89.7 for JOA score; p = 0.783, 88.1/88.6 for Constant Shoulder Score; p = 0.597,1 year post-ARCR; 96.7/95.4 for JOA score; p = 0.238, 96.6/95.4 for Constant Shoulder Score; p = 0.248). Furthermore, preoperative and postoperative stiff shoulder and retear rates were not significantly different between groups (p = 0.152, p = 0.344, p = 0.347, and p = 0.563, respectively). Conclusion: Diabetic patients showed comparable clinical results with non-diabetic patients post-ARCR. Perioperative diabetic control may be recommended for preoperatively uncontrolled diabetic patients. ? 2020 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 218
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in Supine Position
    Housset, Victor
    Payan, Charles
    Nourissat, Geoffroy
    ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2021, 10 (04): : E1131 - E1135
  • [42] Current concepts in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
    Lee, Kang-San
    Kim, Dong-Hyun
    Chung, Seok Won
    Yoon, Jong Pil
    CLINICS IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW, 2025, 28 (01): : 103 - 112
  • [43] Arthroscopic transosseous (anchorless) rotator cuff repair
    Raffaele Garofalo
    Alessandro Castagna
    Mario Borroni
    Sumant G. Krishnan
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2012, 20 : 1031 - 1035
  • [44] A watertight construct in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
    Nassos, Jonathan T.
    ElAttrache, Neal S.
    Angel, Michael J.
    Tibone, James E.
    Limpisvasti, Orr
    Lee, Thay Q.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2012, 21 (05) : 589 - 596
  • [45] Concomitant Arthroscopic SLAP and Rotator Cuff Repair
    Forsythe, Brian
    Guss, Daniel
    Anthony, Shawn G.
    Martin, Scott D.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2010, 92A (06): : 1362 - 1369
  • [46] Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: The learning curve
    Guttmann, D
    Graham, RD
    MacLennan, MJ
    Lubowitz, JH
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2005, 21 (04): : 394 - 400
  • [47] Arthroscopic Laminar Spreader for Rotator Cuff Repair
    Boileau, Pascal
    Martinez-Catalan, Natalia
    Greco, Valentina
    ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2022, 11 (06): : E1033 - E1038
  • [48] Suture anchors in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
    George, MS
    Kuhn, JE
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2004, 12 (04) : 210 - 214
  • [49] Training resources in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
    Vitale, Mark A.
    Kleweno, Conor P.
    Jacir, Alberto M.
    Levine, William N.
    Bigliani, Louis U.
    Ahmad, Christopher S.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2007, 89A (06): : 1393 - 1398
  • [50] Premier Approaches to Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
    Hutchinson, Mark
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2021, 53 (04): : 882 - 882