Clinical results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in diabetic and non- diabetic patients

被引:6
|
作者
Takahashi, Ryosuke [1 ]
Kajita, Yukihiro [1 ,2 ]
Harada, Yohei [2 ]
Iwahori, Yusuke [2 ]
Deie, Masataka [2 ]
机构
[1] Ichinomiya Nishi Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 1 Kaimei Hira, Ichinomiya, Aichi 4801195, Japan
[2] Aichi Med Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan
关键词
FROZEN SHOULDER; ADHESIVE CAPSULITIS; RISK-FACTORS; STIFFNESS; MELLITUS; OUTCOMES; RELEASE; TENDONS; TEARS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jos.2020.03.013
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Although the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) have been reported, few studies have focused on diabetic patients. We investigated and compared the clinical results of ARCR in patients with and without diabetes. Methods: This retrospective study involved 195 consecutive patients who underwent ARCR from 2015 to 2018 in our hospital. Twenty-seven and 168 shoulders were assigned to diabetes and non-diabetes groups, respectively. Diabetic patients with poor control were preoperatively hospitalized for perioperative diabetic control. We evaluated range of motion (ROM), Japanese Orthopaedic Association shoulder (JOA) score, Constant Shoulder Score, and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score preoperatively and at 6 months and 1 year post-ARCR. Rates of rotator cuff retear 1 year post-ARCR and preoperative and postoperative stiff shoulder were also evaluated. We compared the results between groups and analyzed them statistically. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Preoperative ROM, JOA score, Constant Shoulder Score and UCLA scores showed significant improvement at post-ARCR in both groups (p < 0.05). On comparing the groups, although preoperative JOA score and Constant Shoulder Score were significantly lower in diabetes group than in non-diabetes group (diabetic/non-diabetic group; 60.0/65.3 for JOA score; p = 0.003, 59.7/64.2 for Constant Shoulder Score; p = 0.003), there was no significant difference postoperatively (6 months post-ARCR; 88.0/89.7 for JOA score; p = 0.783, 88.1/88.6 for Constant Shoulder Score; p = 0.597,1 year post-ARCR; 96.7/95.4 for JOA score; p = 0.238, 96.6/95.4 for Constant Shoulder Score; p = 0.248). Furthermore, preoperative and postoperative stiff shoulder and retear rates were not significantly different between groups (p = 0.152, p = 0.344, p = 0.347, and p = 0.563, respectively). Conclusion: Diabetic patients showed comparable clinical results with non-diabetic patients post-ARCR. Perioperative diabetic control may be recommended for preoperatively uncontrolled diabetic patients. ? 2020 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Background: Although the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) have been reported, few studies have focused on diabetic patients. We investigated and compared the clinical results of ARCR in patients with and without diabetes. Methods: This retrospective study involved 195 consecutive patients who underwent ARCR from 2015 to 2018 in our hospital. Twenty-seven and 168 shoulders were assigned to diabetes and non-diabetes groups, respectively. Diabetic patients with poor control were preoperatively hospitalized for perioperative diabetic control. We evaluated range of motion (ROM), Japanese Orthopaedic Association shoulder (JOA) score, Constant Shoulder Score, and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score preoperatively and at 6 months and 1 year post-ARCR. Rates of rotator cuff retear 1 year post-ARCR and preoperative and postoperative stiff shoulder were also evaluated. We compared the results between groups and analyzed them statistically. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Preoperative ROM, JOA score, Constant Shoulder Score and UCLA scores showed significant improvement at post-ARCR in both groups (p < 0.05). On comparing the groups, although preoperative JOA score and Constant Shoulder Score were significantly lower in diabetes group than in non-diabetes group (diabetic/non-diabetic group; 60.0/65.3 for JOA score; p = 0.003, 59.7/64.2 for Constant Shoulder Score; p = 0.003), there was no significant difference postoperatively (6 months post-ARCR; 88.0/89.7 for JOA score; p = 0.783, 88.1/88.6 for Constant Shoulder Score; p = 0.597,1 year post-ARCR; 96.7/95.4 for JOA score; p = 0.238, 96.6/95.4 for Constant Shoulder Score; p = 0.248). Furthermore, preoperative and postoperative stiff shoulder and retear rates were not significantly different between groups (p = 0.152, p = 0.344, p = 0.347, and p = 0.563, respectively). Conclusion: Diabetic patients showed comparable clinical results with non-diabetic patients post-ARCR. Perioperative diabetic control may be recommended for preoperatively uncontrolled diabetic patients. ? 2020 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 218
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Arthroscopic Transosseous Rotator Cuff Repair
    Stenson, James
    Sanders, Brett
    Lazarus, Mark
    Austin, Luke
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2023, 31 (07) : E366 - E375
  • [22] Arthroscopic Revision Rotator Cuff Repair
    Denard, Patrick J.
    Burkhart, Stephen S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2011, 19 (11) : 657 - 666
  • [23] Arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair
    Kim, Kyung-Cheon
    Rhee, Kwang-Jin
    Shin, Hyun-Dae
    Kim, Young-Mo
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2008, 31 (04) : 327 - 330
  • [24] Basics of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
    Frisella, W. Anthony
    Cuomo, Frances
    TECHNIQUES IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2007, 8 (04): : 166 - 174
  • [25] Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears With Pseudoparalysis
    Ladermann, Alexandre
    Denard, Patrick
    Burkhart, Stephen
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2012, 142 : S10 - S11
  • [26] Evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair results in patients with anterior greater tubercle cysts
    Sahan, Mehmet Hamdi
    Serbest, Sancar
    Tiftikci, Ugur
    Durgut, Erdogan
    Inal, Mikail
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2019, 27 (01)
  • [27] Perioperative glycemic control reduces the risk of retear in diabetic patients following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A meta-analysis
    Liang, Junwen
    Liang, Qianrun
    Wang, Xihao
    Yun, Xiangdong
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2025, 30 (01) : 78 - 84
  • [28] Results of Arthroscopic Partial Repair of Large Retracted Rotator Cuff Tears
    Wellmann, Mathias
    Lichtenberg, Sven
    da Silva, Gaspar
    Magosch, Petra
    Habermeyer, Peter
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2013, 29 (08): : 1275 - 1282
  • [29] Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Current indications, limitations, techniques, and results
    Stollsteimer, GT
    Savoie, FH
    INSTRUCTIONAL COURSE LECTURES, VOL 47 - 1998, 1998, 47 : 59 - 65
  • [30] Results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for calcific tendonitis: a comparative analysis
    Ernat, Justin J.
    Rakowski, Dylan R.
    Casp, Aaron J.
    Horan, Marilee P.
    Millett, Peter J.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2022, 31 (03) : 616 - 622