Holism reconsidered: a reply to Taljedahl

被引:1
作者
Nordenfelt, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Hlth & Soc, SE-58183 Linkoping, Sweden
来源
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL MEDICINE | 1997年 / 25卷 / 04期
关键词
philosophy of health; medical concepts; disease; medical research programmes; holistic health;
D O I
10.1177/140349489702500404
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In his article Weak and Strong Holism, Inge-Bert Taljedahl criticises some modern theories of health which define health without reference to disease. As an alternative he suggests a kind of theory called Strong holism which emphasises the lawful interrelations between all ontological layers in the human being. In this reply it is argued (1) that Taljedahl does not accurately describe the contents and intentions of the criticised theories and (2) that he does not put forward any alternative theory of health. Strong holism, as characterised by Taljedahl, is a general biological and social-biological research programme, which is very fruitful for scientific research projects, but which does not suggest any particular theory of health.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 245
页数:3
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1978, On the Normal and the Pathological, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-2480-7
[2]  
BOORSE C, HLTH THEORETICAL CON, V44, P542
[3]  
Nordenfelt L, 1995, NATURE HLTH, P35
[4]   HEALTH AND ADAPTEDNESS [J].
PORN, I .
THEORETICAL MEDICINE, 1993, 14 (04) :295-303
[5]   Weak and strong holism [J].
Taljedal, IB .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL MEDICINE, 1997, 25 (02) :67-69