Portfolio optimization by minimizing conditional value-at-risk via nondifferentiable optimization

被引:52
|
作者
Lim, Churlzu [1 ]
Sherali, Hanif D. [2 ]
Uryasev, Stan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
[2] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Grado Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Portfolio optimization; CVaR; Nondifferentiable optimization; VARIABLE TARGET VALUE; VOLUME ALGORITHM; LINEAR-PROGRAMS; CONVERGENCE; LIQUIDATION; GENERATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10589-008-9196-3
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) is a portfolio evaluation function having appealing features such as sub-additivity and convexity. Although the CVaR function is nondifferentiable, scenario-based CVaR minimization problems can be reformulated as linear programs (LPs) that afford solutions via widely-used commercial softwares. However, finding solutions through LP formulations for problems having many financial instruments and a large number of price scenarios can be time-consuming as the dimension of the problem greatly increases. In this paper, we propose a two-phase approach that is suitable for solving CVaR minimization problems having a large number of price scenarios. In the first phase, conventional differentiable optimization techniques are used while circumventing nondifferentiable points, and in the second phase, we employ a theoretically convergent, variable target value nondifferentiable optimization technique. The resultant two-phase procedure guarantees infinite convergence to optimality. As an optional third phase, we additionally perform a switchover to a simplex solver starting with a crash basis obtained from the second phase when finite convergence to an exact optimum is desired. This three phase procedure substantially reduces the effort required in comparison with the direct use of a commercial stand-alone simplex solver (CPLEX 9.0). Moreover, the two-phase method provides highly-accurate near-optimal solutions with a significantly improved performance over the interior point barrier implementation of CPLEX 9.0 as well, especially when the number of scenarios is large. We also provide some benchmarking results on using an alternative popular proximal bundle nondifferentiable optimization technique.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 415
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Portfolio optimization by minimizing conditional value-at-risk via nondifferentiable optimization
    Churlzu Lim
    Hanif D. Sherali
    Stan Uryasev
    Computational Optimization and Applications, 2010, 46 : 391 - 415
  • [2] Suboptimality in portfolio conditional value-at-risk optimization
    Jakobsons, Edgars
    JOURNAL OF RISK, 2016, 18 (04): : 1 - 23
  • [3] Portfolio Optimization Model Of Conditional Value-at-Risk
    He, Linjie
    Liang, Lin
    Ma, Chaoqun
    Zhang, Xiaoyong
    ADVANCES IN BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE AND FINANCIAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 5 : 957 - +
  • [4] Conditional value-at-risk in portfolio optimization: Coherent but fragile
    Lim, Andrew E. B.
    Shanthikumar, J. George
    Vahn, Gah-Yi
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH LETTERS, 2011, 39 (03) : 163 - 171
  • [5] Mean Conditional Value-at-Risk Model for Portfolio Optimization
    Gao, Jianwei
    Liu, Lufang
    2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE AND FINANCIAL ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 246 - 250
  • [6] Non-smooth optimization methods for computation of the Conditional Value-at-risk and portfolio optimization
    Beliakov, Gleb
    Bagirov, Adil
    OPTIMIZATION, 2006, 55 (5-6) : 459 - 479
  • [7] Portfolio optimization with a copula-based extension of conditional value-at-risk
    Krzemienowski, Adam
    Szymczyk, Sylwia
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2016, 237 (1-2) : 219 - 236
  • [8] Portfolio optimization with a copula-based extension of conditional value-at-risk
    Adam Krzemienowski
    Sylwia Szymczyk
    Annals of Operations Research, 2016, 237 : 219 - 236
  • [9] Portfolio optimization with entropic value-at-risk
    Ahmadi-Javid, Amir
    Fallah-Tafti, Malihe
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 279 (01) : 225 - 241
  • [10] Value-at-Risk based portfolio optimization
    Von Puelz, A
    STOCHASTIC OPTIMIZATION: ALGORITHMS AND APPLICATIONS, 2001, 54 : 279 - 302