Clinical Outcome of Reoperation for Mechanical Prosthesis at Aortic Position

被引:7
|
作者
Li, Ning [1 ,2 ]
Peng, Jianhui [1 ]
Tan, Mengwei [1 ]
Bai, Yifan [1 ]
Qiao, Fan [1 ]
Han, Qingqi [1 ]
Lu, Fanglin [1 ]
Li, BaiLing [1 ]
Han, Lin [1 ]
Xu, Zhiyun [1 ]
Zhang, Guanxin [1 ]
机构
[1] Second Mil Med Univ, Changhai Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Second Mil Univ, Naval Med Ctr PLA, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Reoperation; Aortic valve replacement; Mechanical prosthesis; Pannus; Perivalvular leakage; Prosthetic valve endocarditis; VALVE ENDOCARDITIS; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; REPLACEMENT; EXPERIENCE; DETACHMENT; LEAKAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.hlc.2021.01.002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim Redo aortic valve surgery is usually associated with a high risk of mortality and complications. The aim of this study was to investigate the perioperative and long-term outcomes of reoperation after prior me-chanical prosthesis implantation at the aortic position. Method The clinical data of 146 consecutive patients who underwent reoperation at the aortic position between 2003 and 2019 were analysed. Results Mean age was 51.5 +/- 12.7 years and 69 (47.3%) were female. The median interval from prior surgery to redo aortic valve surgery was 6 years. The aetiologies were pannus formation with prosthetic aortic stenosis in 62 cases (42.5%), prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) in five (3.4%), PVE with perivalvular leakage (PVL) in 16 (11.0%), PVL in 45 (30.8%), thrombosis in seven (4.8%), and aortic disease in 11 (7.5%). As for surgical procedure, aortic valve replacement was performed in 81 cases (55.5%), Bentall in 34 (23.3%), PVL repair in six (4.1%), and pannus debridement in 25 (17.1%). Fourteen (14) (9.6%) patients expired perioperatively. Prolonged ventilation time and postoperative renal failure were proved to be significant independent predictors of mortality according to multivariate analysis. Overall survival was 87.8%+/- 7.4% and 76.4%+/- 15.1% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Survival was 87.7%+/- 13.7% and 84.2%+/- 15.6% in the pannus group, and 84.5%+/- 12.6% and 74.6%+/- 19.4% in the non-pannus group at 5 and 10 years, respectively (p=0.951). Survival was 87.5%+/- 14.2% and 75.8%+/- 22.7% in the PVL group and 84.7%+/- 11.9% and 81.6%+/- 13.5% in the non-PVL group at 5 and 10 years, respectively (p=0.365). Conclusions Pannus formation and PVL are two major indications for reoperation of mechanical prosthesis at the aortic position. Redo aortic valve surgery has a satisfactory outcome but with a high risk of complications. Long -term survival of patients seems not to be related to the aetiology. Final decision-making of redo aortic valve surgery should be based on aetiology.
引用
收藏
页码:1084 / 1090
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Aortic Root Reoperation: A Technical Challenge
    Shrestha, Malakh
    Khaladj, Nawid
    Baraki, Hassina
    Al Ahmad, Ammar
    Koigeldiyev, Nurbol
    Pichlmaier, Maximilian
    Haverich, Axel
    Hagl, Christian
    JOURNAL OF HEART VALVE DISEASE, 2010, 19 (02) : 177 - 181
  • [42] First case of Perceval S prosthesis early structural valve deterioration: Not an easy reoperation
    Bouhout, Ismail
    Noly, Pierre-Emmanuel
    Parisi, Andres
    Bouchard, Denis
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 152 (03) : E71 - E73
  • [43] DYNAMICS OF QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH AORTIC STENOSIS AFTER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT WITH A BIOLOGICAL OR MECHANICAL PROSTHESIS
    Bazylev, V. V.
    Rosseykin, E. V.
    Mikulyak, A. I.
    Berezina, E. G.
    Chumbaeva, E. A.
    Chuvilina, K. G.
    Solovyova, K. V.
    KARDIOLOGIYA, 2018, 58 (09) : 31 - 36
  • [44] Twenty-Year Outcome of Aortic Valve Replacement With St. Jude Medical Mechanical Valves in Japanese Patients
    Minakata, Kenji
    Tanaka, Shiro
    Okawa, Yohei
    Kaneko, Tatsuo
    Okonogi, Shuichi
    Usui, Akihiko
    Abe, Tomonobu
    Tamura, Nobushige
    Yanagi, Shigeki
    Sakata, Ryuzo
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2015, 79 (11) : 2380 - 2388
  • [45] Mechanical valve in aortic position is a valid option in children and adolescents
    Champsaur, G
    Robin, J
    Tronc, F
    Curtil, A
    Ninet, J
    Sassolas, F
    Vedrinne, C
    Bozio, A
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 1997, 11 (01) : 117 - 121
  • [46] Rapid pannus formation after few months of obstructing aortic mechanical prosthesis
    Al-Alao B.
    Simoniuk U.
    Heron B.
    Parissis H.
    General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2015, 63 (11) : 613 - 615
  • [47] Facile conversion from biologic to mechanical prosthesis: A bailout for a hostile aortic root
    Rowse, Phillip G.
    Egbe, Alexander C.
    Said, Sameh M.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 155 (06) : E179 - E181
  • [48] Clinical outcome of aortic valve replacement in the elderly
    Chiappini, B
    Bergonzini, M
    Gallieri, S
    Pacini, D
    Pierangeli, A
    Di Bartolomeo, R
    Marinelli, G
    CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 11 (05): : 359 - 365
  • [49] Clinical outcomes and resource utilization after aortic valve replacement with biological or mechanical prosthesis in patients aged 65 years or older
    Perez-Camargo, Daniel
    Montero, Lourdes
    Carnero-Alcazar, Manuel
    Cuervo, Jesus
    Cobiella, Javier
    Campelos-Fernandez, Paula
    Reguillo-Lacruz, Fernando
    Marti, Belen
    Gonzalez, Paloma
    Maroto, Luis C.
    CIRUGIA CARDIOVASCULAR, 2023, 30 (01): : 4 - 10
  • [50] Clinical and hemodynamic results of the Mosaic bioprosthesis in aortic position
    Botzenhardt, F
    Gansera, B
    Günzinger, R
    Kemkes, BM
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KARDIOLOGIE, 2003, 92 (05): : 407 - 414