Clinical Outcome of Reoperation for Mechanical Prosthesis at Aortic Position

被引:7
|
作者
Li, Ning [1 ,2 ]
Peng, Jianhui [1 ]
Tan, Mengwei [1 ]
Bai, Yifan [1 ]
Qiao, Fan [1 ]
Han, Qingqi [1 ]
Lu, Fanglin [1 ]
Li, BaiLing [1 ]
Han, Lin [1 ]
Xu, Zhiyun [1 ]
Zhang, Guanxin [1 ]
机构
[1] Second Mil Med Univ, Changhai Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Second Mil Univ, Naval Med Ctr PLA, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Reoperation; Aortic valve replacement; Mechanical prosthesis; Pannus; Perivalvular leakage; Prosthetic valve endocarditis; VALVE ENDOCARDITIS; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; REPLACEMENT; EXPERIENCE; DETACHMENT; LEAKAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.hlc.2021.01.002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim Redo aortic valve surgery is usually associated with a high risk of mortality and complications. The aim of this study was to investigate the perioperative and long-term outcomes of reoperation after prior me-chanical prosthesis implantation at the aortic position. Method The clinical data of 146 consecutive patients who underwent reoperation at the aortic position between 2003 and 2019 were analysed. Results Mean age was 51.5 +/- 12.7 years and 69 (47.3%) were female. The median interval from prior surgery to redo aortic valve surgery was 6 years. The aetiologies were pannus formation with prosthetic aortic stenosis in 62 cases (42.5%), prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) in five (3.4%), PVE with perivalvular leakage (PVL) in 16 (11.0%), PVL in 45 (30.8%), thrombosis in seven (4.8%), and aortic disease in 11 (7.5%). As for surgical procedure, aortic valve replacement was performed in 81 cases (55.5%), Bentall in 34 (23.3%), PVL repair in six (4.1%), and pannus debridement in 25 (17.1%). Fourteen (14) (9.6%) patients expired perioperatively. Prolonged ventilation time and postoperative renal failure were proved to be significant independent predictors of mortality according to multivariate analysis. Overall survival was 87.8%+/- 7.4% and 76.4%+/- 15.1% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Survival was 87.7%+/- 13.7% and 84.2%+/- 15.6% in the pannus group, and 84.5%+/- 12.6% and 74.6%+/- 19.4% in the non-pannus group at 5 and 10 years, respectively (p=0.951). Survival was 87.5%+/- 14.2% and 75.8%+/- 22.7% in the PVL group and 84.7%+/- 11.9% and 81.6%+/- 13.5% in the non-PVL group at 5 and 10 years, respectively (p=0.365). Conclusions Pannus formation and PVL are two major indications for reoperation of mechanical prosthesis at the aortic position. Redo aortic valve surgery has a satisfactory outcome but with a high risk of complications. Long -term survival of patients seems not to be related to the aetiology. Final decision-making of redo aortic valve surgery should be based on aetiology.
引用
收藏
页码:1084 / 1090
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical Outcome of Double Valve Repalcement With or Without Small Aortic Prosthesis
    Akhtar, Raja Parvez
    Abid, Abdul Rehman
    Nuqshband, Mumraiz Salik
    Khan, Jawad Sajid
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2012, 22 (10): : 617 - 621
  • [2] Early outcome of aortic valve replacement with mechanical prosthesis in patients with aortic stenosis. Is patient-prosthesis mismatch a significant, clinical problem?
    Jander, Slawomir
    Bitner, Miroslaw
    Jegier, Bogdan
    Ostrowski, Stanislaw
    Jaszewski, Ryszard
    ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 3 (01) : 57 - 60
  • [3] Long term outcome of mechanical valve prosthesis in the pulmonary position
    Dos, Laura
    Munoz-Guijosa, Christian
    Mendez, Ana B.
    Ginel, Antonino
    Montiel, Jose
    Padro, Josep Maria
    Subirana, Maria T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 150 (02) : 173 - 176
  • [4] Smeloff-Cutter Mechanical Prosthesis in the Aortic Position for 49 Years
    Chalkley, Robin A.
    Kim, Chong W.
    Choi, James W.
    Roberts, William C.
    Schussler, Jeffrey M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 124 (03) : 457 - 459
  • [5] Clinical study of reoperation for acute type A aortic dissection
    Feng, Yi
    Ma, Xian-Tao
    Zhang, Xiao-Xue
    Wajeehullahi, Akilu
    Chen, Zi-Jun
    Li, Shi-Liang
    Cheng, Cai
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [6] Benchmarking Outcomes: Reoperation for Aortic Valve Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch
    Keeling, William B.
    Beckerman, Ziv
    Wei, Jane
    Binongo, Jose
    Leshnower, Bradley G.
    Chen, Edward P.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 111 (05) : 1472 - 1477
  • [7] A Clinical Analysis of Thirty-Five Patients Undergoing Aortic Reoperation
    Yuanfeng, Xin
    Kaitao, Jian
    Mahmood, Safwa
    Jianshi, Liu
    Lizhong, Sun
    Yaping, He
    Wei, Liu
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 37 (03) : 343 - 349
  • [8] Intermittent, Noncyclic Dysfunction of a Mechanical Aortic Prosthesis by Pannus Formation
    Giroux, Sylvie K.
    Labinaz, Marino X.
    Grisoli, Dominique
    Klug, Andrew P.
    Veinot, John P.
    Burwash, Ian G.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2010, 23 (01) : 107.e1 - 107.e3
  • [9] Outcome after homograft redo operation in aortic position
    Kowert, Anke
    Vogt, Ferdinand
    Beiras-Fernandez, Andres
    Reichart, Bruno
    Kilian, Eckehard
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2012, 41 (02) : 404 - 408
  • [10] Intraoperative Transesophageal and Postoperative Transthoracic Echocardiographic Evaluation of a Mechanical Heart Valve Prosthesis Implanted at Aortic Position
    Babu, Saravana
    Sreedhar, Rupa
    Gadhinglajkar, Shrinivas V.
    Dash, Prasanta Kumar
    Sukesan, Subin
    Pillai, Vivek
    Panicker, Varghese T.
    Shriram, Lovhale Pravin
    Aggarwal, Neelam
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2018, 32 (02) : 782 - 789