The contrasting microRNA content of a drought tolerant and a drought susceptible wheat cultivar

被引:35
作者
Bakhshi, Behnam [1 ]
Fard, Ehsan Mohseni [2 ]
Gharechahi, Javad [3 ]
Safarzadeh, Mahdieh [1 ]
Nikpay, Nava [1 ]
Fotovat, Reza [2 ]
Azimi, Mohammad Reza [2 ]
Salekdeh, Ghasem Hosseini [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Agr Res Educ & Extens Org, Agr Biotechnol Res Inst Iran, Dept Syst Biol, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Zanjan, Fac Agr, Dept Agron & Plant Breeding, Zanjan, Iran
[3] Baqiyatallah Univ Med Sci, Human Genet Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[4] ACECR, Royan Inst Stem Cell Biol & Technol, Cell Sci Res Ctr, Dept Mol Syst Biol, Tehran, Iran
关键词
miRNA; Target genes; Next-generation sequencing; Drought stress; Post-transcriptional gene regulation; RESPONSIVE MICRORNAS; STRESS TOLERANCE; GENE-EXPRESSION; ABIOTIC STRESS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; WATER; ARABIDOPSIS; IDENTIFICATION; RESISTANCE; INDUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jplph.2017.05.012
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Drought stress represents one of the most common stresses affecting the productivity of crop plants. A rather recently discovered component of the plant response to drought is the cellular population of microRNAs. Here, the microRNA content was revealed of two bread wheat cultivars contrasting strongly with respect to the ability to withstand drought stress. A total of 1813 miRNAs was identified, grouped into 106 families. Some 104 of these miRNAs were predicted to match 212 novel miRNA precursors. In the drought tolerant cultivar (SM), 105 (33 known and 72 novel) miRNAs were altered in abundance by the imposition of drought stress, while the equivalent number in the more sensitive cultivar (SW) was 51 (20 and 31). An in silico analysis predicted that these miRNAs target at least 1959 genes in SM and 1111 in SW, suggesting their broad contribution to the drought stress response. Among the target genes were several known stress-related genes, encoding, for example, superoxide dismutase, various MYB transcription factors, various ABA signaling proteins and various MADS-box transcription factors. In many cases, the more susceptible cultivar SW behaved in a contrasting manner. The suggestion is that miRNAs represent an important aspect of the drought stress response, post-transcriptionally regulating a range of stress-related genes.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 43
页数:9
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Arabidopsis AtMYC2 (bHLH) and AtMYB2 (MYB) function as transcriptional activators in abscisic acid signaling [J].
Abe, H ;
Urao, T ;
Ito, T ;
Seki, M ;
Shinozaki, K ;
Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K .
PLANT CELL, 2003, 15 (01) :63-78
[2]  
Akdogan G., 2015, GENOMICS, P1
[3]  
Anjum SA, 2011, AFR J AGR RES, V6, P2026
[4]   MADS-box gene family in rice: genome-wide identification, organization and expression profiling during reproductive development and stress [J].
Arora, Rita ;
Agarwal, Pinky ;
Ray, Swatismita ;
Singh, Ashok Kumar ;
Singh, Vijay Pal ;
Tyagi, Akhilesh K. ;
Kapoor, Sanjay .
BMC GENOMICS, 2007, 8 (1)
[5]   The significance of digital gene expression profiles [J].
Audic, S ;
Claverie, JM .
GENOME RESEARCH, 1997, 7 (10) :986-995
[6]   MicroRNA Signatures of Drought Signaling in Rice Root [J].
Bakhshi, Behnam ;
Fard, Ehsan Mohseni ;
Nikpay, Nava ;
Ebrahimi, Mohammad Ali ;
Bihamta, Mohammad Reza ;
Mardi, Mohsen ;
Salekdeh, Ghasem Hosseini .
PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (06)
[7]   Real-time quantification of microRNAs by stem-loop RT-PCR [J].
Chen, CF ;
Ridzon, DA ;
Broomer, AJ ;
Zhou, ZH ;
Lee, DH ;
Nguyen, JT ;
Barbisin, M ;
Xu, NL ;
Mahuvakar, VR ;
Andersen, MR ;
Lao, KQ ;
Livak, KJ ;
Guegler, KJ .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2005, 33 (20) :e179.1-e179.9
[8]   A microRNA as a translational repressor of APETALA2 in Arabidopsis flower development [J].
Chen, XM .
SCIENCE, 2004, 303 (5666) :2022-2025
[9]   Disruption of the cellulose synthase gene, AtCesA8/IRX1, enhances drought and osmotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis [J].
Chen, ZZ ;
Hong, XH ;
Zhang, HR ;
Wang, YQ ;
Li, X ;
Zhu, JK ;
Gong, ZZ .
PLANT JOURNAL, 2005, 43 (02) :273-283
[10]   Drought stress and reactive oxygen species Production, scavenging and signaling [J].
de Carvalho, Maria Helena Cruz .
PLANT SIGNALING & BEHAVIOR, 2008, 3 (03) :156-165