A comparison of the effects of propofol and midazolam on memory during two levels of sedation by using target-controlled infusion

被引:21
作者
de Roode, A
van Gerven, JMA
Schoemaker, RC
Engbers, FHM
Olieman, W
Kroon, JR
Cohen, AF
Bovill, JG
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Ctr Human Drug Res, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-200011000-00003
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
We examined memory during sedation with target-controlled infusions of propofol and midazolam in a double-blinded five-way, cross-over study in 10 volunteers. Each active drug infusion was targeted to sedation level 1 (asleep) and level 4 (lethargic) as determined with the Observer Assessment of Alertness/ Sedation scale. At the target level of sedation, drug concentration was clamped for 30 min, during which time neutral words were presented. After 2 h, explicit memory was assessed by recall, and implicit memory by using a wordstem completion test. Venous drug concentrations (mean +/- SD) were 1350 ng/mL (+/-332 ng/ mL) for propofol and 208 ng/mL (+/-112 ng/mL) for midazolam during Observer Assessment of Alertness/ Sedation scale level 4; and 1620 ng/mL (+/-357 ng/mL) and 249 ng/mL (+/-82 ng/mL) respectively during level 1. The wordstem completion test frequencies at low level sedation were significantly higher than spontaneous frequencies (8.7% + 2.4%; P < 0.05 in all cases), and lower than during placebo (33.6% + 23%) (P < 0.05 in all cases, except P = 0.076 for propofol at level 4). Clinically distinct levels of sedation were accompanied by small differences in venous propofol or midazolam concentrations. This indicates steep concentration-effect relationships. Neutral information is still memorized during low-lever sedation with both drugs. The memory effect of propofol and midazolam did not differ significantly.
引用
收藏
页码:1056 / 1061
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   MIDAZOLAM KINETICS IN WOMEN OF 2 AGE-GROUPS [J].
AVRAM, MJ ;
FRAGEN, RJ ;
CALDWELL, NJ .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1983, 34 (04) :505-508
[2]  
BONKE B., 1990, MEMORY AWARENESS ANA, P197
[3]  
CHERNIK DA, 1990, J CLIN PSYCHOPHARM, V10, P244
[4]  
COETZEE JF, 1995, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V82, P28
[5]   UNCONSCIOUS PERCEPTION AND GENERAL-ANESTHESIA [J].
DIXON, NF .
BAILLIERES CLINICAL ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 1989, 3 (03) :473-485
[6]   THE INTERACTIONS OF MIDAZOLAM AND FLUMAZENIL ON HUMAN-MEMORY AND COGNITION [J].
GHONEIM, MM ;
BLOCK, RI ;
PING, STS ;
ELZAHABY, HM ;
HINRICHS, JV .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1993, 79 (06) :1183-1192
[7]  
GHONEIM MM, 1990, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V72, P926
[8]   Learning and memory during general anesthesia - An update [J].
Ghoneim, MM ;
Block, RI .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 87 (02) :387-410
[9]   ACTIVATION MAKES WORDS MORE ACCESSIBLE, BUT NOT NECESSARILY MORE RETRIEVABLE [J].
GRAF, P ;
MANDLER, G .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1984, 23 (05) :553-568
[10]   Electroencephalographic bispectral index correlates with intraoperative recall and depth of propofol-induced sedation [J].
Liu, J ;
Singh, H ;
White, PF .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 84 (01) :185-189