Performance evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx® Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 Panel

被引:10
|
作者
Lebourgeois, Samuel [1 ,2 ]
Storto, Alexandre [1 ,2 ]
Gout, Bernard [3 ]
Le Hingrat, Quentin [1 ,2 ]
Tjader, Gustave Ardila [2 ]
Del Carmen Cerdan, Maria [4 ]
English, Alistair [5 ]
Pareja, Josep [4 ]
Love, Joanna [4 ]
Houhou-Fidouh, Nadhira [2 ]
Manissero, Davide [5 ]
Descamps, Diane [1 ,2 ]
Visseaux, Benoit [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Versite Paris, INSERM, Decis Sci Infect Dis Control & Care DeSCID, UMR 1137 IAME, Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris, Hop Bichat, AP HP, Serv Virol, Paris, France
[3] Arc Regulatory Ltd, Moneymore, Magherafelt, North Ireland
[4] STAT Dx Life SL, Barcelona, Spain
[5] QIAGEN Manchester Ltd, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; Diagnostic testing; Real time-PCR; Multiplex; COVID-19;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijid.2021.04.066
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the QIAstat-Dx((R)) Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 Panel (QIAstatSARS-CoV-2), which is a closed, fully automated, multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay that detects severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and 21 other pathogens that cause respiratory disease. Methods: Nasopharyngeal swabs from patients with or suspected of having coronavirus disease 2019 were collected and tested at Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Paris, France. Using the World Health Organisation-approved real-time-PCR assay developed by the Charite Institute of Virology as the reference, positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) were calculated. Results: In total, 189 negative and 88 positive samples were analyzed. QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 had an NPA of 90.48% (95% confidence interval (CI), 85.37%, 94.26%) and a PPA of 94.32% (95% CI, 87.24%, 98.13%). Coinfections were detected by QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 in 4/277 specimens. The methods exhibited comparable failure rates (23/307 [7.5%] vs. 6/298 [2.0%] for QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 and reference methods, respectively). The turnaround time was shorter for QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 compared with the reference method (difference in mean -14:30 h [standard error, 0:03:23; 95% CI, -14:37, -14:24]; P < 0.001). Conclusions: QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 shows good agreement with the reference assay, providing faster and accurate results for detecting SARS-CoV-2. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 181
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative Review of SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and Influenza A Respiratory Viruses
    Abdelrahman, Zeinab
    Li, Mengyuan
    Wang, Xiaosheng
    FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [42] SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid tests For reliable detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection not suitable
    Reuter, Tom
    Lange, Constanze
    Zeyher, Sharay
    Woelk, Benno
    Kramer, Jan
    PRAVENTION UND GESUNDHEITSFORDERUNG, 2023, 18 (03): : 370 - 376
  • [43] Mucosal Immunity against SARS-CoV-2 in the Respiratory Tract
    Noh, Hae-Eun
    Rha, Min-Seok
    PATHOGENS, 2024, 13 (02):
  • [44] Ventilatory management of SARS-CoV-2 acute respiratory failure
    Artaud-Macari, E.
    Le Bouar, G.
    Maris, J.
    Dantoing, E.
    Vatignez, T.
    Girault, C.
    REVUE DES MALADIES RESPIRATOIRES, 2023, 40 (9-10) : 751 - 767
  • [45] Respiratory Microbial Co-infection With SARS-CoV-2
    Massey, Bill W.
    Jayathilake, Karuna
    Meltzer, Herbert Y.
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [46] Biosensor detection of airborne respiratory viruses such as SARS-CoV-2
    Breshears, Lane E.
    Nguyen, Brandon T.
    Robles, Samantha Mata
    Wu, Lillian
    Yoon, Jeong-Yeol
    SLAS TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 27 (01): : 4 - 17
  • [47] Communication: Comparison of Respiratory Specimens for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Lee, Jee-Soo
    Seo, Myoung-Seock
    Gwon, Tae-Rin
    Cho, Sung Im
    Kim, Young-gon
    Kim, Man Jin
    Park, Jae Hyeon
    Kang, Chang Kyung
    Choe, Pyoeng Gyun
    Park, Wan Beom
    Kim, Nam-Joong
    Oh, Myoung-don
    Kim, Taek Soo
    Park, Sung Sup
    Seong, Moon-Woo
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND LABORATORY SCIENCE, 2021, 51 (01): : 140 - 144
  • [48] In Flight Transmission of Severe Acute Respiratory SARS-CoV-2
    Choi, Edward M.
    Chu, Daniel K. W.
    Cheng, Peter K. C.
    Tsang, Dominic N. C.
    Peiris, Malik
    Bausch, Daniel G.
    Poon, Leo L. M.
    Watson-Jones, Deborah
    EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 26 (11) : 2713 - 2716
  • [49] Recovery in patients with SARS-CoV-2 associated respiratory failure
    Kohlbrenner, Dario
    Kuhn, Manuel
    Stuessi-Helbling, Melina
    Spielmanns, Marc
    Nordmann, Yves
    Clarenbach, Christian F.
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2021, 58
  • [50] Respiratory Protective Equipment Reconsiderations in the Age of SARS-CoV-2
    Ke, Wei-Ren
    Chen, Chih-Chieh
    Huang, Sheng-Hsiu
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (02)