Performance evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx® Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 Panel

被引:10
|
作者
Lebourgeois, Samuel [1 ,2 ]
Storto, Alexandre [1 ,2 ]
Gout, Bernard [3 ]
Le Hingrat, Quentin [1 ,2 ]
Tjader, Gustave Ardila [2 ]
Del Carmen Cerdan, Maria [4 ]
English, Alistair [5 ]
Pareja, Josep [4 ]
Love, Joanna [4 ]
Houhou-Fidouh, Nadhira [2 ]
Manissero, Davide [5 ]
Descamps, Diane [1 ,2 ]
Visseaux, Benoit [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Versite Paris, INSERM, Decis Sci Infect Dis Control & Care DeSCID, UMR 1137 IAME, Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris, Hop Bichat, AP HP, Serv Virol, Paris, France
[3] Arc Regulatory Ltd, Moneymore, Magherafelt, North Ireland
[4] STAT Dx Life SL, Barcelona, Spain
[5] QIAGEN Manchester Ltd, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; Diagnostic testing; Real time-PCR; Multiplex; COVID-19;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijid.2021.04.066
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the QIAstat-Dx((R)) Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 Panel (QIAstatSARS-CoV-2), which is a closed, fully automated, multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay that detects severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and 21 other pathogens that cause respiratory disease. Methods: Nasopharyngeal swabs from patients with or suspected of having coronavirus disease 2019 were collected and tested at Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Paris, France. Using the World Health Organisation-approved real-time-PCR assay developed by the Charite Institute of Virology as the reference, positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) were calculated. Results: In total, 189 negative and 88 positive samples were analyzed. QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 had an NPA of 90.48% (95% confidence interval (CI), 85.37%, 94.26%) and a PPA of 94.32% (95% CI, 87.24%, 98.13%). Coinfections were detected by QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 in 4/277 specimens. The methods exhibited comparable failure rates (23/307 [7.5%] vs. 6/298 [2.0%] for QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 and reference methods, respectively). The turnaround time was shorter for QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 compared with the reference method (difference in mean -14:30 h [standard error, 0:03:23; 95% CI, -14:37, -14:24]; P < 0.001). Conclusions: QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 shows good agreement with the reference assay, providing faster and accurate results for detecting SARS-CoV-2. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 181
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics and risk factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in Zambia
    Tembo, John
    Egbe, Nkongho Franklyn
    Maluzi, Kwitaka
    Mulonga, Kangwa
    Chilufya, Moses
    Kapata, Nathan
    Mukonka, Victor
    Simulundu, Edgar
    Zumla, Alimuddin
    Fwoloshi, Sombo
    Mulenga, Lloyd
    Pallerla, Srinivas Reddy
    Velavan, Thirumalaisamy P.
    Bates, Matthew
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 120 : 150 - 157
  • [32] Evaluation of the EasyNAT SARS-CoV-2 assay PCR test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection
    Fernandez-Sanchez, Fernando
    Martin-Bautista, Elena
    Rivas-Ruiz, Francisco
    Wu, Winnie
    Garcia-Aranda, Marilina
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2024, 326
  • [33] Evaluation of the performance of multiple immunoassay diagnostic platforms on the National Microbiology Laboratory SARS-CoV-2 National Serology Panel
    Dibernardo, Antonia
    Toledo, Nikki P. L.
    Robinson, Alyssia
    Osiowy, Carla
    Giles, Elizabeth
    Day, Jacqueline
    Lindsay, L. Robbin
    Drebot, Michael A.
    Booth, Timothy F.
    Pidduck, Tamara
    Baily, Ashley
    Charlton, Carmen L.
    Tipples, Graham
    Kanji, Jamil N.
    Brochu, Gino
    Lang, Amanda
    Therrien, Christian
    Belanger-Collard, Melina
    Beaulac, Sylvie-Nancy
    Gilfix, Brian M.
    Boivin, Guy
    Hamelin, Marie-eve
    Carbonneau, Julie
    Levesque, Simon
    Martin, Philippe
    Finzi, Andres
    Gendron-Lepage, Gabrielle
    Goyette, Guillaume
    Benlarbi, Mehdi
    Gasser, Romain
    Fortin, Claude
    Martel-Lafferriere, Valerie
    Lavoie, Myriam
    Guerin, Renee
    Haraoui, Louis-Patrick
    Renaud, Christian
    Jenkins, Craig
    O'Brien, Sheila F.
    Drews, Steven J.
    Conrod, Valerie
    Tran, Vanessa
    Awrey, Bill
    Scheuermann, Robert
    DuPuis, Alan
    Payne, Anne
    Warszycki, Casey
    Girardin, Roxie
    Lee, William
    Zahariadis, George
    Jiao, Lei
    JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE CANADA (JAMMI), 2022, 7 (03): : 186 - 195
  • [34] Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 with a biophysical perspective
    Barlas, Sait Berk
    Adalier, Nur
    Dasdag, Omer
    Dasdag, Suleyman
    BIOTECHNOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGICAL EQUIPMENT, 2021, 35 (01) : 392 - 406
  • [35] Evaluation of the BioFire® COVID-19 test and Respiratory Panel 2.1 for rapid identification of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swab samples
    Eckbo, Eric J.
    Locher, Kerstin
    Caza, Melissa
    Li, Lisa
    Lavergne, Valery
    Charles, Marthe
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2021, 99 (03)
  • [36] Evaluation of the Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swabs.
    Ben Abdelhanin, Myriam
    Mvumbi, Dieudonne M.
    Agathine, Aurelie
    Nanos, Nikolaos
    Gidenne, Stephane
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 144
  • [37] Testing the limits of multiplex respiratory virus assays for SARS-CoV-2 at high cycle threshold values: Comparative performance of cobas 6800/8800 SARS-CoV-2 & Influenza A/B, Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV, and cobas Liat SARS-CoV-2 & Influenza A/B
    Matic, Nancy
    Lawson, Tanya
    Ritchie, Gordon
    Lowe, Christopher
    Romney, Marc
    JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE CANADA (JAMMI), 2024, 8 (04): : 328 - 335
  • [38] Performance Evaluation of the BD SARS-CoV-2 Reagents for the BD MAX System
    Yanson, Karen
    Laviers, William
    Neely, Lori
    Lockamy, Elizabeth
    Castillo-Hernandez, Luis Carlos
    Oldfied, Christopher
    Ackerman, Ronald
    Ackerman, Jamie
    Ortiz, Daniel A.
    Pacheco, Sixto
    Simner, Patricia J.
    Young, Stephen
    McElvania, Erin
    Cooper, Charles K.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 59 (12)
  • [39] Evaluation of diagnostic performance of SARS-CoV-2 detection kits: a comparative study
    Basma Sherif
    Hala M. Hafez
    Marwa Ramadan Abdelhalim
    Menna Allah Zakaria Abou Elwafa
    Nancy Samir Wahba
    Perihan Hamdy
    Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 12
  • [40] Evaluation of diagnostic performance of SARS-CoV-2 detection kits: a comparative study
    Sherif, Basma
    Hafez, Hala M.
    Abdelhalim, Marwa Ramadan
    Elwafa, Menna Allah Zakaria Abou
    Wahba, Nancy Samir
    Hamdy, Perihan
    BENI-SUEF UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF BASIC AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2023, 12 (01)