Performance evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx® Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 Panel

被引:10
|
作者
Lebourgeois, Samuel [1 ,2 ]
Storto, Alexandre [1 ,2 ]
Gout, Bernard [3 ]
Le Hingrat, Quentin [1 ,2 ]
Tjader, Gustave Ardila [2 ]
Del Carmen Cerdan, Maria [4 ]
English, Alistair [5 ]
Pareja, Josep [4 ]
Love, Joanna [4 ]
Houhou-Fidouh, Nadhira [2 ]
Manissero, Davide [5 ]
Descamps, Diane [1 ,2 ]
Visseaux, Benoit [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Versite Paris, INSERM, Decis Sci Infect Dis Control & Care DeSCID, UMR 1137 IAME, Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris, Hop Bichat, AP HP, Serv Virol, Paris, France
[3] Arc Regulatory Ltd, Moneymore, Magherafelt, North Ireland
[4] STAT Dx Life SL, Barcelona, Spain
[5] QIAGEN Manchester Ltd, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; Diagnostic testing; Real time-PCR; Multiplex; COVID-19;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijid.2021.04.066
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the QIAstat-Dx((R)) Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 Panel (QIAstatSARS-CoV-2), which is a closed, fully automated, multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay that detects severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and 21 other pathogens that cause respiratory disease. Methods: Nasopharyngeal swabs from patients with or suspected of having coronavirus disease 2019 were collected and tested at Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Paris, France. Using the World Health Organisation-approved real-time-PCR assay developed by the Charite Institute of Virology as the reference, positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) were calculated. Results: In total, 189 negative and 88 positive samples were analyzed. QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 had an NPA of 90.48% (95% confidence interval (CI), 85.37%, 94.26%) and a PPA of 94.32% (95% CI, 87.24%, 98.13%). Coinfections were detected by QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 in 4/277 specimens. The methods exhibited comparable failure rates (23/307 [7.5%] vs. 6/298 [2.0%] for QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 and reference methods, respectively). The turnaround time was shorter for QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 compared with the reference method (difference in mean -14:30 h [standard error, 0:03:23; 95% CI, -14:37, -14:24]; P < 0.001). Conclusions: QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 shows good agreement with the reference assay, providing faster and accurate results for detecting SARS-CoV-2. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 181
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A multicenter evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx meningitis-encephalitis syndromic test kit as compared to the conventional diagnostic microbiology workflow
    Boers, Stefan A.
    van Houdt, Robin
    van Sorge, Nina M.
    Groot, Jelle
    van Aarle, Yvette
    van Bussel, Mario J. A. W. M.
    Smit, Louise F. E.
    Wessels, Els
    Claas, Eric C. J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2024, 43 (03) : 511 - 516
  • [22] Evaluation of the efficiency of chemical cartridges for respiratory protection against SARS-CoV-2
    Paiva, Jose D.
    Neto, Paulo C.
    COGENT ENGINEERING, 2022, 9 (01):
  • [23] Clinical Evaluation of BioFire COVID-19 Test, BioFire Respiratory Panel 2.1, and Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 Assays for Sample-to-Answer Detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Park, Joonhong
    Kim, So Yeon
    Lee, Jaehyeon
    Hong, Ki Ho
    GENES, 2023, 14 (01)
  • [24] Comparative Evaluation of the PowerChek Respiratory Virus Panel RT-PCR Assay Detecting 16 Respiratory Viruses Including SARS-CoV-2
    Kim, Jinyeong
    Han, Eunhee
    Kim, Jieun
    Kim, Young Jin
    Bae, Mi Hyun
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2025, 97 (02)
  • [25] Evaluation of the Ion AmpliSeq SARS-CoV-2 Research Panel by Massive Parallel Sequencing
    Alessandrini, Federica
    Caucci, Sara
    Onofri, Valerio
    Melchionda, Filomena
    Tagliabracci, Adriano
    Bagnarelli, Patrizia
    Di Sante, Laura
    Turchi, Chiara
    Menzo, Stefano
    GENES, 2020, 11 (08) : 1 - 14
  • [26] Evaluation of the genalyte maverick SARS-CoV-2 multi-antigen serology panel
    Donato, Leslie J.
    Theel, Elitza S.
    Baumann, Nikola A.
    Bridgeman, Amber R.
    Blommel, Joseph H.
    Wu, Yanhong
    Karon, Brad S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY PLUS, 2021, 1 (03):
  • [27] Comparison of the PowerChek SARS-CoV-2, Influenza A&B, RSV Multiplex Real-time PCR Kit and BioFire Respiratory Panel 2.1 for simultaneous detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A and B, and respiratory syncytial virus
    Kim, Tae Yeul
    Kim, Ji-Youn
    Shim, Hyang Jin
    Yun, Sun Ae
    Jang, Ja-Hyun
    Huh, Hee Jae
    Kim, Jong-Won
    Lee, Nam Yong
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2021, 298
  • [28] Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of a SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A/B Combo Rapid Antigen Test in Respiratory Samples
    Dinc, Harika Oykue
    Karabulut, Nuran
    Alacam, Sema
    Uysal, Hayriye Kirkoyun
    Dasdemir, Ferhat Osman
    Onel, Mustafa
    Tuyji Tok, Yesim
    Sirekbasan, Serhat
    Agacfidan, Ali
    Gareayaghi, Nesrin
    cakan, Huseyin
    Eryigit, Onder Yuksel
    Kocazeybek, Bekir
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (05)
  • [29] Coinfection of SARS-CoV-2 and Other Respiratory Pathogens
    Ma, Ling
    Wang, Wenjing
    Le Grange, Jehane Michael
    Wang, Xiaorong
    Du, Shuaixian
    Li, Chen
    Wei, Jia
    Zhang, Jin-Nong
    INFECTION AND DRUG RESISTANCE, 2020, 13 : 3045 - 3053
  • [30] Implementation and Evaluation of the Clear Dx Platform for Sequencing SARS-CoV-2 Genomes in a Public Health Laboratory
    Ramaiah, Arunachalam
    Khubbar, Manjeet
    Scott, Samantha
    Bauer, Amy
    Lentz, Jennifer
    Akinyemi, Katherine
    Skillman, Addie
    Weiner, Joshua
    Balakrishnan, Nandhakumar
    Bhattacharyya, Sanjib
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2023, 11 (02):