Performance evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx® Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 Panel

被引:10
|
作者
Lebourgeois, Samuel [1 ,2 ]
Storto, Alexandre [1 ,2 ]
Gout, Bernard [3 ]
Le Hingrat, Quentin [1 ,2 ]
Tjader, Gustave Ardila [2 ]
Del Carmen Cerdan, Maria [4 ]
English, Alistair [5 ]
Pareja, Josep [4 ]
Love, Joanna [4 ]
Houhou-Fidouh, Nadhira [2 ]
Manissero, Davide [5 ]
Descamps, Diane [1 ,2 ]
Visseaux, Benoit [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Versite Paris, INSERM, Decis Sci Infect Dis Control & Care DeSCID, UMR 1137 IAME, Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris, Hop Bichat, AP HP, Serv Virol, Paris, France
[3] Arc Regulatory Ltd, Moneymore, Magherafelt, North Ireland
[4] STAT Dx Life SL, Barcelona, Spain
[5] QIAGEN Manchester Ltd, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; Diagnostic testing; Real time-PCR; Multiplex; COVID-19;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijid.2021.04.066
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the QIAstat-Dx((R)) Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 Panel (QIAstatSARS-CoV-2), which is a closed, fully automated, multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay that detects severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and 21 other pathogens that cause respiratory disease. Methods: Nasopharyngeal swabs from patients with or suspected of having coronavirus disease 2019 were collected and tested at Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Paris, France. Using the World Health Organisation-approved real-time-PCR assay developed by the Charite Institute of Virology as the reference, positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) were calculated. Results: In total, 189 negative and 88 positive samples were analyzed. QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 had an NPA of 90.48% (95% confidence interval (CI), 85.37%, 94.26%) and a PPA of 94.32% (95% CI, 87.24%, 98.13%). Coinfections were detected by QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 in 4/277 specimens. The methods exhibited comparable failure rates (23/307 [7.5%] vs. 6/298 [2.0%] for QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 and reference methods, respectively). The turnaround time was shorter for QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 compared with the reference method (difference in mean -14:30 h [standard error, 0:03:23; 95% CI, -14:37, -14:24]; P < 0.001). Conclusions: QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 shows good agreement with the reference assay, providing faster and accurate results for detecting SARS-CoV-2. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 181
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 panel, a rapid multiplex PCR method for the diagnosis of COVID-19
    Ishikane, Masahiro
    Unoki-Kubota, Hiroyuki
    Moriya, Ataru
    Kutsuna, Satoshi
    Ando, Honami
    Kaburagi, Yasushi
    Suzuki, Tetsuya
    Iwamoto, Noriko
    Kimura, Moto
    Ohmagari, Norio
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2022, 28 (06) : 729 - 734
  • [2] Ct values as a diagnostic tool for monitoring SARS-CoV-2 viral load using the QIAstat-Dx® Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 Panel
    Juanola-Falgarona, Marti
    Penarrubia, Luis
    Jimenez-Guzman, Sara
    Porco, Roberto
    Congost-Teixidor, Claudia
    Varo-Velazquez, Marta
    Rao, Sonia N.
    Pueyo, Gemma
    Manissero, Davide
    Pareja, Josep
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 122 : 930 - 935
  • [3] Syndromic approach to SARS-CoV-2 detection using QIAstat-Dx SARS-CoV-2 panel from clinical samples
    Gupta, Akshita
    Soni, Anushika
    Rooge, Sheetalnath
    Paul, Diptanu
    Agarwal, Reshu
    Tarai, Bansidhar
    Gupta, Ekta
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2021, 298
  • [4] Multicenter Evaluation of QIAstat-Dx Respiratory Panel V2 for Detection of Viral and Bacterial Respiratory Pathogens
    Boers, Stefan A.
    Melchers, Willem J. G.
    Peters, Cas J. A.
    Toonen, Marga
    McHugh, Martin P.
    Templeton, Kate E.
    Claas, Eric C. J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 58 (06)
  • [5] Validation and evaluation of the performance of QIAstat-Dx gastrointestinal panel in pooled stool samples
    Chen, Xinbin
    Huang, Huina
    Su, Ying
    Zhou, Xiaojian
    Liao, Menghua
    Li, Yanhua
    Cheng, Zidong
    Jin, Muzi
    Tian, Jie
    Wang, Haibo
    ACTA TROPICA, 2025, 261
  • [6] Performance of the QIAstat-Dx Gastrointestinal Panel for Diagnosing Infectious Gastroenteritis
    Boers, Stefan A.
    Peters, Cas J. A.
    Wessels, Els
    Melchers, Willem J. G.
    Claas, Eric C. J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 58 (03)
  • [7] Multicenter Evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx Respiratory Panel for Detection of Viruses and Bacteria in Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens
    Leber, Amy L.
    Lisby, Jan Gorm
    Hansen, Glen
    Relich, Ryan F.
    Schneider, Uffe Vest
    Granato, Paul
    Young, Stephen
    Pareja, Josep
    Hannet, Irene
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 58 (05)
  • [8] QIAstat-Dx gastrointestinal panel and Luminex xTAG gastrointestinal pathogen panel comparative evaluation
    Giffen, Samantha R.
    Sadler, Jacob M.
    Miller, Melissa B.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 61 (11)
  • [9] Evaluation of the QlAstat-Dx Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 Panel, the First Rapid Multiplex PCR Commercial Assay for SARS-CoV-2 Detection
    Visseaux, Benoit
    Le Hingrat, Quentin
    Collin, Gilles
    Bouzid, Donia
    Lebourgeois, Samuel
    Le Pluart, Diane
    Deconinck, Laurene
    Lescure, Francois-Xavier
    Lucet, Jean-Christophe
    Bouadma, Lila
    Timsit, Jean-Francois
    Descamps, Diane
    Yazdanpanah, Yazdan
    Casalino, Enrique
    Houhou-Fidouh, Nadhira
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 58 (08)
  • [10] Evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel, a multiplex PCR platform for the detection of community-acquired meningoencephalitis
    Sundelin, Thomas
    Bialas, Johanna
    de Diego, Juana
    Hermanowski, Markus
    Leibhan, Hendrik
    Ponderand, Lea
    Juanola-Falgarona, Marti
    Jones, Tara
    Rey, Melisa
    Johnson, Sarah
    Pareja, Josep
    Caspar, Yvan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 61 (10)