Data-Driven Dose-Volume Histogram Prediction

被引:4
作者
Polizzi, Mitchell [1 ,2 ]
Watkins, Robert W. [1 ]
Watkins, William T. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Radiat Oncol, Charlottesville, VA USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Radiat Oncol, Richmond, VA USA
[3] State Univ, Virginia Polytech Inst, Blacksburg, VA USA
[4] City Hope Natl Med Ctr, Duarte, CA USA
关键词
MODULATED RADIATION-THERAPY; TREATMENT PLAN QUALITY; ORGANS-AT-RISK; IMRT; RADIOTHERAPY; CENTERS; DVH;
D O I
10.1016/j.adro.2021.100841
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate dose-volume histogram (DVH) prediction from prior radiation therapy data. Methods and Materials: An Oncospace radiation therapy database was constructed including images, structures, and dose distributions for patients with advanced lung cancer. DVH data was queried for total lungs, esophagus, heart, and external body contours. Each query returned DVH data for the N-most similar organs at risk (OARs) based on OAR-to-planning-target-volume (PTV) geometry via the overlap volume histogram (OVH). The DVHs for 5, 20, and 50 of the most similar OVHs were returned for each OAR for each patient. The OVH(0cm) is the relative volume of the OAR overlapping with the PTV, and the OVH(2cm) is the relative volume of the OAR 2 cm away from the PTV. The OVH(cm) and DVH(%) queried from the database were separated into interquartile ranges (IQRs), nonoutlier ranges (NORs) (equal to 3 pound IQR), and the average database DVH (DVH-DB) computed from the NOR data. The ability to predict the clinically delivered DVH was evaluated based on percentiles and differences between the DVH-DB and the clinical DVH (DVH-CL) for a varying number of returned patient DVHs for a subset of patients. Results: The ability to predict the clinically delivered DVH was excellent in the lungs and body; the IQR and NOR were <4% and <16%, respectively, in the lungs and <1% and <5%, respectively, in the body at all distances less than 2 cm from the PTV. For 21/23 patients considered, the differences in lung DVH-DB and DVH-CL were <4.6% and in 14/23 cases, <3%. In esophagus and heart, the ability to predict DVH-CL was weaker, with mean DVH differences >10% for 12/23 esophagi and 10/23 hearts. In esophagus and heart queries, the NOR was often 10% to 100% volume in dose ranges between 0% and 50% of prescription, independent of the number of patients queried. Conclusions: Using prior data to predict clinical dosimetry is increasingly of interest, but model- and data-driven methods have limitations if based on limited data sets. This study's results showed that prediction may be reasonable in organs containing tumors with known overlap, but for nonoverlapped OARs, planning preference and plan design may dominate the clinical dose. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] A method for a priori estimation of best feasible DVH for organs-at-risk: Validation for head and neck VMAT planning
    Ahmed, Saeed
    Nelms, Benjamin
    Gintz, Dawn
    Caudell, Jimmy
    Zhang, Geoffrey
    Moros, Eduardo G.
    Feygelman, Vladimir
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (10) : 5486 - 5497
  • [2] Predicting dose-volume histograms for organs-at-risk in IMRT planning
    Appenzoller, Lindsey M.
    Michalski, Jeff M.
    Thorstad, Wade L.
    Mutic, Sasa
    Moore, Kevin L.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (12) : 7446 - 7461
  • [3] Can all centers plan intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) effectively? An external audit of dosimetric comparisons between three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and IMRT for adjuvant chemoradiation for gastric cancer
    Chung, Hans T.
    Lee, Brian
    Park, Eileen
    Lu, Jiade J.
    Xia, Ping
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 71 (04): : 1167 - 1174
  • [4] Exploration of tradeoffs in intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Craft, D
    Halabi, T
    Bortfeld, T
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (24) : 5857 - 5868
  • [5] An approach for practical multiobjective IMRT treatment planning
    Craft, David
    Halabi, Tarek
    Shih, Helen A.
    Bortfeld, Thomas
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (05): : 1600 - 1607
  • [6] Multicriteria VMAT optimization
    Craft, David
    McQuaid, Dualta
    Wala, Jeremiah
    Chen, Wei
    Salari, Ehsan
    Bortfeld, Thomas
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (02) : 686 - 696
  • [7] Integral dose investigation of non-coplanar treatment beam geometries in radiotherapy
    Dan Nguyen
    Dong, Peng
    Long, Troy
    Ruan, Dan
    Low, Daniel A.
    Romeijn, Edwin
    Sheng, Ke
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (01)
  • [8] Knowledge-based planning for intensity-modulated radiation therapy: A review of data-driven approaches
    Ge, Yaorong
    Wu, Q. Jackie
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : 2760 - 2775
  • [9] A Knowledge-Based Approach to Improving and Homogenizing Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning Quality Among Treatment Centers: An Example Application to Prostate Cancer Planning
    Good, David
    Lo, Joseph
    Lee, W. Robert
    Wu, Q. Jackie
    Yin, Fang-Fang
    Das, Shiva K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (01): : 176 - 181
  • [10] Automation in intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning-a review of recent innovations
    Hussein, Mohammad
    Heijmen, Ben J. M.
    Verellen, Dirk
    Nisbet, Andrew
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 91 (1092)