How to protect your premium product from low-price competitors: Price, quality, or portfolio adjustment?

被引:8
作者
Jost, Peter-J. [1 ]
机构
[1] WHU Otto Beisheim Sch Management, Inst Org Theory, D-56179 Vallendar, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ijresmar.2013.11.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In a game-theoretic framework, I analyze how a brand manufacturer can thwart new entrants into its market. Three strategic options are considered, a price adjustment of the premium product, a quality adjustment of the premium product and a portfolio adjustment of adding a fighter brand. In a basic setup, I show that the incumbent's best response to entry is to choose a portfolio adjustment. If, however, the incumbent is uncertain about whether the rival firm will enter the market, a price adjustment of the premium product might be the better alternative if launching the fighter brand is associated with costs. Moreover, if technological progress improves the efficiency of product development, a combined quality and portfolio adjustment might be the best alternative for the incumbent. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 265
页数:13
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Aaker D.A., 2009, MANAGING BRAND EQUIT
[2]  
Aaker D.A., 2004, Brand portfolio strategy
[3]  
Andrews J., 1998, WORKING PAPER, P98
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, BRAND LEADERSHIP NEX
[5]  
Berry J., 1994, J MARKETING RES, V40, P39
[6]   Umbrella branding with imperfect observability and moral hazard [J].
Cabral, Luis M. B. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2009, 27 (02) :206-213
[7]   A COMMENT ON A MODEL OF VERTICAL PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION [J].
CHOI, CJ ;
SHIN, HS .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 1992, 40 (02) :229-231
[8]  
Cluelch J. A., 1996, HARVARD BUS REV, P99
[9]   An anatomy of a decision-support system for developing and launching line extensions [J].
Cohen, MA ;
Eliashberg, J ;
Ho, TH .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1997, 34 (01) :117-129
[10]  
GABSZEWICZ JJ, 1979, J ECON THEORY, V20, P340