The limits of bibliotherapy: A study of the differential effectiveness of self-administered interventions in individuals with panic attacks

被引:36
作者
Febbraro, GAR
Clum, GA
Roodman, AA
Wright, JH
机构
[1] Med Univ S Carolina, Natl Crime Victims Res & Treatment Ctr, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[2] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Ctr Cognit Therapy, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0005-7894(99)80004-5
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The present study compared the differential effectiveness of bibliotherapy with no therapist contact (bibliotherapy alone), and bibliotherapy plus daily self-monitoring and self-administered feedback (bibliotherapy plus monitoring), to daily self-monitoring and self-administered feedback (monitoring alone) and wait-list controls, in individuals with panic attacks. A repeated-measures MANOVA revealed no Condition x Time interaction or condition effect. However, a main effect for time across conditions emerged. Univariate tests revealed significant reductions from pre to posttreatment for all groups for full-blown panic attacks, avoidance, panic cognitions, and panic;symptoms. The results of this study cast doubt on the efficacy of bibliotherapy and self-monitoring interventions when utilized absent from contact with a professional who conducts the assessment and monitors treatment compliance.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 222
页数:14
相关论文
共 36 条