Pregnancy and Perinatal Outcomes of Patients With Prior Cesarean Section After a Single Embryo Transfer in IVF/ICSI: A Retrospective Cohort Study

被引:20
作者
Wang, Lin [1 ]
Wang, Jing [1 ]
Lu, Nan [1 ]
Liu, Jiayin [1 ]
Diao, Feiyang [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Clin Ctr Reprod Med, State Key Lab Reprod Med, Affiliated Hosp 1, Nanjing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
live birth; single embryo transfer; in vitro fertilization; Cesarean delivery; Cesarean section defect; SCAR DEFECT; UTERINE RUPTURE; DELIVERY; WOMEN; FERTILITY; IMPACT; LABOR; TRIAL; RATES; TERM;
D O I
10.3389/fendo.2022.851213
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo study the influence of the previous cesarean section on the pregnancy outcomes and perinatal outcomes in single embryo transfer (SET) cycles in an in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET) setting compared to those with previous vaginal delivery (VD). In addition, the association between fertility outcomes and different cesarean scar defect (CSD) sizes was studied. MethodThis was a retrospective cohort study conducted in the Reproductive Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. A total of 4,879 patients with previous delivery history undergoing SET were included between January 2015 and April 2019. Patients were divided into the VD group and cesarean delivery (CD) group according to different modes of previous delivery. The primary outcome was live birth rate. The pregnancy outcomes of CD were analyzed as a subgroup and the relationship between pregnancy outcomes as well as the different sizes of CSD were explored by logistic regression analysis. ResultsThere were no significant differences in live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and miscarriage rate between the CD group and VD group. The incidence rates of pregnancy complications such as pregnancy hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus, placenta abnormalities, premature rupture of membrane, and postpartum hemorrhage were similar in the two groups. Live birth rate was significantly lower in the CSD group (23.77% vs 37.01%, aOR: 0.609, 95% CI: 0.476-0.778) comparing to patients without CSD. There were also significant differences in clinical pregnancy rate (37.52% vs 47.64%, aOR: 0.779, 95%CI: 0.623-0.973) and miscarriage rate (34.55% vs 20.59%, aOR: 1.407, 95%CI:1.03-1.923). Large size CSD significantly decreased live birth rate (13.33% vs 26.29%, aOR: 0.422, 95%CI: 0.197-0.902) and clinical pregnancy rate (25.33% vs 40.09%, aOR: 0.503, 95%CI: 0.272-0.930) compared with small size CSD. ConclusionFor women with previous cesarean sections, the pregnancy outcomes were similar to those with previous VD without increased perinatal complications following SET. The presence of CSD was associated with a marked reduction in live birth rate, especially in patients with large size CSD.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Why are multiple pregnancy rates and single embryo transfer rates so different globally, and what do we do about it? [J].
Adamson, G. David ;
Norman, Robert J. .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2020, 114 (04) :680-689
[2]   Comparison of transvaginal ultrasound and saline contrast sonohysterography in evaluation of cesarean scar defect: a prospective cohort study [J].
Antila-Langsjo, Riitta ;
Maenpaa, Johanna U. ;
Huhtala, Heini ;
Tomas, Eija ;
Staff, Synnove .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2018, 97 (09) :1130-1136
[3]   Cesarean scar defect: a prospective study on risk factors [J].
Antila-Langsjo, Riitta M. ;
Maenpaa, Johanna U. ;
Huhtala, Heini S. ;
Tomas, Eija, I ;
Staff, Synnove M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 219 (05) :458.e1-458.e8
[4]   Should Cesarean Scar Defect Be Treated Laparoscopically? A Case Report and Review of the Literature [J].
Api, Murat ;
Boza, Aysen ;
Gorgen, Husnu ;
Api, Olus .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 22 (07) :1145-1152
[5]   Effect of cesarean delivery on the endometrium [J].
Ben-Nagi, Jara ;
Walker, Amy ;
Jurkovic, Davor ;
Yazbek, Joseph ;
Aplin, John D. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2009, 106 (01) :30-34
[6]   Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections [J].
Boerma, Ties ;
Ronsmans, Carine ;
Melesse, Dessalegn Y. ;
Barros, Aluisio J. D. ;
Barros, Fernando C. ;
Juan, Liang ;
Moller, Ann-Beth ;
Say, Lale ;
Hosseinpoor, Ahmad Reza ;
Yi, Mu ;
Rabello Neto, Dacio de Lyra ;
Temmerman, Marleen .
LANCET, 2018, 392 (10155) :1341-1348
[7]   Something new about early pregnancy: decidual biosensoring and natural embryo selection [J].
Brosens, J. J. ;
Gellersen, B. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 36 (01) :1-5
[8]   Blastocyst-stage versus cleavage-stage embryo transfer in the first frozen cycles of OHSS-risk patients who deferred from fresh embryo transfer [J].
Chen, Hua ;
Lv, Jie-Qiang ;
Wu, Xin-Mei ;
Xiao, Yu ;
Xi, Hai-Tao ;
Zhu, Chun-Fang ;
Huang, Jian-Ying ;
Zhang, Fan ;
Ge, Hong-Shan .
GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2015, 31 (09) :698-701
[9]   Reproductive Outcomes of Single Embryo Transfer in Women with Previous Cesarean Section [J].
Chen, Ting ;
Li, Bo ;
Shi, Hao ;
Bu, Zhi Qin ;
Zhang, Fu Qing ;
Su, Ying Chun .
REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2021, 28 (04) :1049-1059
[10]   Caesarean section defects may affect pregnancy outcomes after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a retrospective study [J].
Diao, Junrong ;
Gao, Ge ;
Zhang, Yunshan ;
Wang, Xinyan ;
Zhang, Yinfeng ;
Han, Ying ;
Du, Aijun ;
Luo, Haining .
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2021, 21 (01)