Exploring equivalence domain in nonlinear inverse problems using Covariance Matrix Adaption Evolution Strategy (CMAES) and random sampling

被引:36
作者
Grayver, Alexander V. [1 ]
Kuvshinov, Alexey V. [1 ]
机构
[1] ETH, Inst Geophys, Sonneggstr 5, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Numerical solutions; Inverse theory; Magnetotellurics; Geomagnetic induction; Marine electromagnetics; MARINE CSEM DATA; TIKHONOVS REGULARIZATION; BAYESIAN INVERSION; DATA MISFIT; ALGORITHM; PARAMETER; DISTRIBUTIONS; UNCERTAINTY; ADVANTAGES; ROBUST;
D O I
10.1093/gji/ggw063
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
This paper presents a methodology to sample equivalence domain (ED) in nonlinear partial differential equation (PDE)-constrained inverse problems. For this purpose, we first applied state-of-the-art stochastic optimization algorithm called Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy (CMAES) to identify low-misfit regions of the model space. These regions were then randomly sampled to create an ensemble of equivalent models and quantify uncertainty. CMAES is aimed at exploring model space globally and is robust on very ill-conditioned problems. We show that the number of iterations required to converge grows at a moderate rate with respect to number of unknowns and the algorithm is embarrassingly parallel. We formulated the problem by using the generalized Gaussian distribution. This enabled us to seamlessly use arbitrary norms for residual and regularization terms. We show that various regularization norms facilitate studying different classes of equivalent solutions. We further show how performance of the standard Metropolis-Hastings Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm can be substantially improved by using information CMAES provides. This methodology was tested by using individual and joint inversions of magneotelluric, controlled-source electromagnetic (EM) and global EM induction data.
引用
收藏
页码:971 / 987
页数:17
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Comparison-Based Natural Gradient Optimization in High Dimension [J].
Akimoto, Youhei ;
Auger, Anne ;
Hansen, Nikolaus .
GECCO'14: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2014 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, 2014, :373-380
[2]  
Alvers M. R., 2013, 75 EAGE C EXH INC SP, DOI [10.3997/2214-4609.20130125, DOI 10.3997/2214-4609.20130125]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, SPRINGER SCI
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Parameter estimation and inverse problems, DOI DOI 10.1016/C2009-0-61134-X
[5]   Comparison of Stochastic Optimization Algorithms in Hydrological Model Calibration [J].
Arsenault, Richard ;
Poulin, Annie ;
Cote, Pascal ;
Brissette, Francois .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2014, 19 (07) :1374-1384
[6]  
Auger A, 2009, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5526, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-02011-7_3
[7]  
Benazera Emmanuel, 2015, LIBCMAES
[8]   A primal-dual interior-point framework for using the L1 or L2 norm on the data and regularization terms of inverse problems [J].
Borsic, A. ;
Adler, A. .
INVERSE PROBLEMS, 2012, 28 (09)
[9]   Solving large-scale PDE-constrained Bayesian inverse problems with Riemann manifold Hamiltonian Monte Carlo [J].
Bui-Thanh, T. ;
Girolami, M. .
INVERSE PROBLEMS, 2014, 30 (11)
[10]  
Cerv V, 2007, ANN GEOPHYS-ITALY, V50, P7