Watershed prioritization for soil erosion mapping in the Lesser Himalayan Indian basin using PCA and WSA methods in conjunction with morphometric parameters and GIS-based approach

被引:23
作者
Kumar, Atul [1 ]
Singh, Sunil [1 ]
Pramanik, Malay [2 ]
Chaudhary, Shairy [1 ]
Maurya, Ashwani Kumar [3 ]
Kumar, Manoj [4 ]
机构
[1] Hemvati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal Univ, Sch Earth Sci, Dept Geog, Srinagar 246174, Uttarakhand, India
[2] Tata Inst Social Sci, Jamsetji Tata Sch Disaster Studies, Ctr Geo Informat, Mumbai 400088, Maharashtra, India
[3] Kumaun Univ, Dept Geog, Naini Tal 263001, Uttarakhand, India
[4] Jawaharlal Nehru Univ, Ctr Econ Studies & Planning, Sch Social Sci, New Delhi 110067, India
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
Soil erosion; Kalsa River; Lesser Himalayan basin; Watershed prioritization; Principal component analysis; Weighted sum analysis; AVERAGE SLOPE MAP; RIVER-BASIN; SEDIMENT YIELD; LAND-USE; SUBWATERSHEDS; SUSCEPTIBILITY; AREAS; CONSERVATION; NORTHEAST; ECOSYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s10668-021-01586-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Watersheds in the subtropical Himalayan basins are highly prone to land degradation due to deforestation, landslides, intensive agriculture, population pressure and overgrazing, in particular, where various fluvial and denudation processes occur. It is important to assess the magnitude of problem and to understand the erosion process under normal conditions, so that effective measures can be implemented. Therefore, the study selected Kalsa watershed from the Lesser Himalayan region, where soil erosion is more prominent. Regarding this issue, to identify the hot spot of soil erosion of the basin, watershed prioritization methods using advanced geographical information system and remote sensing techniques integrated with weighted sum analysis (WSA) and principal component analysis (PCA). In addition, a comparison has been made to evaluate the performance of these models. The study considered sixteen different morphometric parameters, including linear (rho coefficient, stream frequency, drainage density, length of overland flow, drainage texture and constant of channel maintenance); landscape (relative relief, relief ratio, basin slope and ruggedness number); and shape (elongation ratio, form factor, circulatory ratio and compactness coefficient). Both the methods PCA and WSA indicate the same results showing high priority, meaning the outlet watersheds have high priority. The sub-watersheds in the north-eastern part have the lowest priority. The results also show that the length overland flow, relative relief, basin relief ratio and hypsometric integral are the most important indicators. The sub-watersheds prioritize high ranks, medium ranks and low ranks out of 10 sub-watersheds covering about 45.32%, 27.78% and 26.90% area of the Kalsa River watershed, respectively. This study will help regional planners, farmers and governments take more detailed decisions to propose efficient soil erosion control measures and conservation priorities of the watershed. The study findings have implications for sustainable land management and conservation goal targets (target 2.3 and 2.4; target 3.9; target 13.1, 13.2 and 13.3; target 15.3 and 15.4), which finally helps to achieve the United Nation's 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
引用
收藏
页码:3723 / 3761
页数:39
相关论文
共 119 条
  • [1] Sub-watershed prioritization based on sediment yield using game theory
    Adhami, Maryam
    Sadeghi, Seyed Hamidreza
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2016, 541 : 977 - 987
  • [2] An assessment to prioritise the critical erosion-prone sub-watersheds for soil conservation in the Gumti basin of Tripura, North-East India
    Ahmed, Istak
    Das , Nibedita
    Debnath, Jatan
    Bhowmik, Moujuri
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2017, 189 (11)
  • [3] Altaf F., 2013, Geography Journal, P1, DOI DOI 10.1155/2013/178021
  • [4] Morphometry and land cover based multi-criteria analysis for assessing the soil erosion susceptibility of the western Himalayan watershed
    Altaf, Sadaff
    Meraj, Gowhar
    Romshoo, Shakil Ahmad
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2014, 186 (12) : 8391 - 8412
  • [5] Erodibility prioritization of sub-watersheds using morphometric parameters analysis and its mapping: A comparison among TOPSIS, VIKOR, SAW, and CF multi-criteria decision making models
    Ameri, Alireza Arab
    Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza
    Cerda, Artemi
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 613 : 1385 - 1400
  • [6] Watershed prioritization for soil and water conservation aspect using GIS and remote sensing: PCA-based approach at northern elevated tract Bangladesh
    Arefin, Riad
    Mohir, Md Mohirul Islam
    Alam, Jahangir
    [J]. APPLIED WATER SCIENCE, 2020, 10 (04)
  • [7] Streamflow and Sediment Yield Prediction for Watershed Prioritization in the Upper Blue Nile River Basin, Ethiopia
    Ayele, Gebiaw T.
    Teshale, Engidasew Z.
    Yu, Bofu
    Rutherfurd, Ian D.
    Jeong, Jaehak
    [J]. WATER, 2017, 9 (10):
  • [8] Babar, 2014, INT J GEOLOGY AGR EN, V2, P2348
  • [9] Estimation of soil losses by USLE model using GIS at Mashhad plain, Northeast of Iran
    Bagherzadeh, Ali
    [J]. ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2014, 7 (01) : 211 - 220
  • [10] Morphometric evaluation of Swarnrekha watershed, Madhya Pradesh, India: an integrated GIS-based approach
    Banerjee A.
    Singh P.
    Pratap K.
    [J]. Applied Water Science, 2017, 7 (4) : 1807 - 1815