Workplace Productivity and Voice Disorders: A Cognitive Interviewing Study on Presenteeism in Individuals With Spasmodic Dysphonia

被引:22
作者
Isetti, Derek [1 ]
Meyer, Tanya [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Speech & Hearing Sci, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
关键词
Spasmodic dysphonia; Presenteeism; Workplace productivity; ACTIVITY IMPAIRMENT QUESTIONNAIRE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; WORK PRODUCTIVITY; COMMUNICATIVE PARTICIPATION; BOTULINUM TOXIN; SCALE; LIMITATIONS; VALIDATION; INSTRUMENT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.03.017
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objective. The objective of this study was to obtain initial reactions and suggested modifications to two existing presenteeism scales: the Stanford Presenteeism Scale 6 (SPS-6) and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) among a cohort of employed individuals with a focal laryngeal dystonia, spasmodic dysphonia (SD). Study design. The study design is a qualitative study. Methods. Nine speakers with SD underwent cognitive interviews, during which they were asked to evaluate the relevance of statements and clarity of wording on the SPS-6, the WPAI-SHP, and an additional set of voice-related statements designed by the researchers. Participants were asked to complete the scales, rank order statements in terms of perceived importance, and suggest additional statements of relevance. Results. Although all participants noted that their SD did have an effect on their jobs, there were suggestions for modifying both the WPAI-SHP and the SPS-6. Participants regarded specific voice-related statements that were generated by the researchers to be of greater importance than the majority of the statements on the SPS-6. Minor changes in the wording of the instructions on the WPAI-SHP were recommended. Conclusions. Presenteeism is an important construct to measure in individuals with a chronic voice disorder such as SD. However, existing presenteeism scales might best be administered in conjunction with additional statements that are more voice related so that clinicians can be made aware of specific difficulties encountered in the workplace.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   The Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB): Item Bank Calibration and Development of a Disorder-Generic Short Form [J].
Baylor, Carolyn ;
Yorkston, Kathryn ;
Eadie, Tanya ;
Kim, Jiseon ;
Chung, Hyewon ;
Amtmann, Dagmar .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2013, 56 (04) :1190-1208
[2]   The consequences of spasmodic dysphonia on communication-related quality of life: A qualitative study of the insider's experiences [J].
Baylor, CR ;
Yorkston, KA ;
Eadie, TL .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2005, 38 (05) :395-419
[3]   Botulinum toxin management of spasmodic dysphonia (Laryngeal dystonia): A 12-year experience in more than 900 patients [J].
Blitzer, A ;
Brin, MF ;
Stewart, CF .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 1998, 108 (10) :1435-1441
[4]   Presenteeism: Critical Issues [J].
Brooks, Ambyr ;
Hagen, Susan E. ;
Sathyanarayanan, Sudhakar ;
Schultz, Alyssa B. ;
Edington, Dee W. .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2010, 52 (11) :1055-1067
[5]   Assessing productivity loss and activity impairment in severe or difficult-to-treat asthma [J].
Chen, Hubert ;
Blanc, Paul D. ;
Hayden, Mary L. ;
Bleecker, Eugene R. ;
Chawla, Anita ;
Lee, June H. .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (02) :231-239
[6]  
Fowler F.J., 2009, Survey research methods, Vfourth
[7]   Validation of an instrument to measure voice-related quality of life (V-RQOL) [J].
Hogikyan, ND ;
Sethuraman, G .
JOURNAL OF VOICE, 1999, 13 (04) :557-569
[8]   SPASTIC DYSPHONIA - A PATIENT PROFILE OF 200 CASES [J].
IZDEBSKI, K ;
DEDO, HH ;
BOLES, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 1984, 5 (01) :7-14
[9]  
Jacobson BH., 1997, Am J Speech Lang Pathol, V6, P66, DOI [10.1044/1058-0360.0603.66, DOI 10.1044/1058-0360.0603.66]
[10]   Presenteeism in the workplace: A review and research agenda [J].
Johns, Gary .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2010, 31 (04) :519-542