Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with early discontinuation of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice

被引:13
作者
Weycker, Derek [1 ]
Li, Xiaoyan [2 ]
Barron, Rich [2 ]
Li, Yanli [2 ]
Reiner, Maureen [2 ]
Kartashov, Alex [1 ]
Figueredo, Jacqueline [1 ]
Tzivelekis, Spiros [2 ]
Garcia, Jacob [2 ]
机构
[1] PAI, Davis Court 4, Brookline, MA USA
[2] Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
关键词
Febrile neutropenia; Pegfilgrastim; Neulasta; Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; BREAST-CANCER; PROPENSITY SCORE; DOSE-INTENSITY; DOUBLE-BLIND; FILGRASTIM; CARE; MULTICENTER; MORTALITY; ONCOLOGY; COSTS;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-015-3039-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Accumulating evidence suggests that not all cancer chemotherapy patients who receive first-cycle pegfilgrastim prophylaxis continue to receive it in subsequent cycles and that these patients may be subsequently at higher risk of febrile neutropenia (FN). Additional evidence from US clinical practice is warranted. Methods Data from two US private healthcare claims repositories were employed. The source population comprised adults who received "intermediate-risk" or "high-risk" chemotherapy regimens for solid cancers or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and first-cycle pegfilgrastim prophylaxis. From the source population, all patients who did not receive second-cycle pegfilgrastim prophylaxis ("comparison patients") were matched (1:1) to those who received it ("pegfilgrastim patients") based on cancer, regimen, and propensity score. Odds ratios (OR) for FN-broad and narrow definitions-during the second chemotherapy cycle were estimated for comparison patients versus pegfilgrastim patients using generalized estimating equations. Results A total of 2245 comparison patients (5.3 % of source population) were matched to pegfilgrastim patients; cohorts were well-balanced on baseline characteristics. Second-cycle FN incidence proportions for comparison and pegfilgrastim patients were 3.8 versus 2.2 % based on broad definition and 2.6 versus 0.8 % based on narrow definition; corresponding OR were 1.7 (95 % CI 1.2-2.5, p = 0.002) and 3.5 (95 % CI 2.0-6.0, p < 0.001). Results were similar within cancer/regimen-subgroups and were robust when using alternative methods for confounding adjustment. Conclusions In this retrospective evaluation of cancer chemotherapy patients who received first-cycle pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice, a clinically relevant minority did not receive second-cycle prophylaxis. Second-cycle FN odds among this subset were significantly higher than they were among those who continued prophylaxis.
引用
收藏
页码:2481 / 2490
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim for prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with lymphoma: a systematic review
    Girma Tekle Gebremariam
    Atalay Mulu Fentie
    Kebede Beyene
    Beate Sander
    Gebremedhin Beedemariam Gebretekle
    BMC Health Services Research, 22
  • [42] A comparison of eflapegrastim to pegfilgrastim in the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with early-stage breast cancer undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy (RECOVER): A Phase 3 study
    Cobb, Patrick Wayne
    Moon, Yong Wha
    Mezei, Klara
    Lang, Istvan
    Bhat, Gajanan
    Chawla, Shanta
    Hasal, Steven J.
    Schwartzberg, Lee S.
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (17): : 6234 - 6243
  • [43] Pegfilgrastim vs filgrastim in primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer after chemotherapy: a cost-effectiveness analysis for Germany
    Sehouli, J.
    Goertz, A.
    Steinle, T.
    Dubois, R.
    Plesnila-Frank, C.
    Lalla, A.
    von Minckwitz, G.
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2010, 135 (09) : 385 - 389
  • [44] Pegfilgrastim-Apgf (Nyvepria): Biosimilar USFDA Approval for the Treatment of Chemotherapy-induced Febrile Neutropenia and Current Updates on Clinical Trials
    Ali, Faraat
    Sharma, Kamna
    Ali, Asad
    CURRENT DRUG TARGETS, 2022, 23 (09) : 924 - 932
  • [45] Pegfilgrastim -: Rational drug design for the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia
    Lüftner, D
    Possinger, K
    ONKOLOGIE, 2005, 28 (11): : 595 - 602
  • [46] Pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis vs. current practice neutropenia management in elderly breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
    Aapro, Matti
    Schwenkglenks, Matthias
    Lyman, Gary H.
    Lopez Pousa, Antonio
    Lawrinson, Susan
    Skacel, Tomas
    Bacon, Pamela
    von Minckwitz, Gunter
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2010, 74 (03) : 203 - 210
  • [47] Lipegfilgrastim for the prophylaxis and treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia
    Ratti, Margherita
    Tomasello, Gianluca
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 8 (01) : 15 - 24
  • [48] Using a Computer-Based Risk Assessment Tool to Identify Risk for Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia
    Miller, Kevin
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2010, 14 (01) : 87 - 91
  • [49] Pegfilgrastim Administered Once Per Cycle Reduces Incidence of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia
    Jeffrey Crawford
    Drugs, 2002, 62 : 89 - 98
  • [50] Management of Breast Cancer Patients with Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia or Febrile Neutropenia
    Fontanella, Caterina
    Bolzonello, Silvia
    Lederer, Bianca
    Aprile, Giuseppe
    BREAST CARE, 2014, 9 (04) : 239 - 245