Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with early discontinuation of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice

被引:13
作者
Weycker, Derek [1 ]
Li, Xiaoyan [2 ]
Barron, Rich [2 ]
Li, Yanli [2 ]
Reiner, Maureen [2 ]
Kartashov, Alex [1 ]
Figueredo, Jacqueline [1 ]
Tzivelekis, Spiros [2 ]
Garcia, Jacob [2 ]
机构
[1] PAI, Davis Court 4, Brookline, MA USA
[2] Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
关键词
Febrile neutropenia; Pegfilgrastim; Neulasta; Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; BREAST-CANCER; PROPENSITY SCORE; DOSE-INTENSITY; DOUBLE-BLIND; FILGRASTIM; CARE; MULTICENTER; MORTALITY; ONCOLOGY; COSTS;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-015-3039-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Accumulating evidence suggests that not all cancer chemotherapy patients who receive first-cycle pegfilgrastim prophylaxis continue to receive it in subsequent cycles and that these patients may be subsequently at higher risk of febrile neutropenia (FN). Additional evidence from US clinical practice is warranted. Methods Data from two US private healthcare claims repositories were employed. The source population comprised adults who received "intermediate-risk" or "high-risk" chemotherapy regimens for solid cancers or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and first-cycle pegfilgrastim prophylaxis. From the source population, all patients who did not receive second-cycle pegfilgrastim prophylaxis ("comparison patients") were matched (1:1) to those who received it ("pegfilgrastim patients") based on cancer, regimen, and propensity score. Odds ratios (OR) for FN-broad and narrow definitions-during the second chemotherapy cycle were estimated for comparison patients versus pegfilgrastim patients using generalized estimating equations. Results A total of 2245 comparison patients (5.3 % of source population) were matched to pegfilgrastim patients; cohorts were well-balanced on baseline characteristics. Second-cycle FN incidence proportions for comparison and pegfilgrastim patients were 3.8 versus 2.2 % based on broad definition and 2.6 versus 0.8 % based on narrow definition; corresponding OR were 1.7 (95 % CI 1.2-2.5, p = 0.002) and 3.5 (95 % CI 2.0-6.0, p < 0.001). Results were similar within cancer/regimen-subgroups and were robust when using alternative methods for confounding adjustment. Conclusions In this retrospective evaluation of cancer chemotherapy patients who received first-cycle pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice, a clinically relevant minority did not receive second-cycle prophylaxis. Second-cycle FN odds among this subset were significantly higher than they were among those who continued prophylaxis.
引用
收藏
页码:2481 / 2490
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim for prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with lymphoma: a systematic review
    Gebremariam, Girma Tekle
    Fentie, Atalay Mulu
    Beyene, Kebede
    Sander, Beate
    Gebretekle, Gebremedhin Beedemariam
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [22] Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia with Pegfilgrastim: Pharmacokinetics and Patient Outcomes
    Yang, Bing-Bing
    Savin, Michael A.
    Green, Michael
    CHEMOTHERAPY, 2012, 58 (05) : 387 - 398
  • [23] Early lymphopenia as a risk factor for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia
    Choi, CW
    Sung, HJ
    Park, KH
    Yoon, SY
    Kim, SJ
    Oh, SC
    Seo, JH
    Kim, BS
    Shin, SW
    Kim, YH
    Kim, JS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, 2003, 73 (04) : 263 - 266
  • [24] Predictive modeling of the outcomes of chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia prophylaxis with biosimilar filgrastim (MONITOR-GCSF study)
    Aapro, M.
    Ludwig, H.
    Bokemeyer, C.
    Gascon, P.
    Boccadoro, M.
    Denhaerynck, K.
    Krendyukov, A.
    Gorray, M.
    MacDonald, K.
    Abraham, I.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2016, 27 (11) : 2039 - 2045
  • [25] Pegfilgrastim for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with solid tumors
    Lambertini, Matteo
    Ferreira, Arlindo R.
    Del Mastro, Lucia
    Danesi, Romano
    Pronzato, Paolo
    EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY, 2015, 15 (12) : 1799 - 1817
  • [26] On-body injector pegfilgrastim for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia prophylaxis: Current Status
    Abraham, Ivo
    Crawford, Jeffrey
    Schwartzberg, Lee
    CANCER TREATMENT AND RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 40
  • [27] Reply: Cost-efficiency analyses for the US of biosimilar filgrastim-sndz, reference filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, and pegfilgrastim with on-body injector in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia
    McBride, Ali
    Campbell, Kim
    Bikkina, Mohan
    MacDonald, Karen
    Abraham, Ivo
    Balu, Sanjeev
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 21 (06) : 606 - 609
  • [28] Budget Saving Potential of Pegfilgrastim Biosimilar for the Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia, in Italy
    Berto, Patrizia
    Bellone, Marco
    Sabinot, Alice
    Pinto, Carmine
    Martino, Massimo
    Generali, Daniele
    Carriero, Pier Luigi
    Sanna, Maria Domenica
    FARMECONOMIA-HEALTH ECONOMICS AND THERAPEUTIC PATHWAYS, 2022, 23 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [29] Colony-stimulating factors: Clinical evidence for treatment and prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia
    Raposo C.G.
    Marín Á.P.
    Barón M.G.
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2006, 8 (10) : 729 - 734
  • [30] Chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia: primary G-CSF prophylaxis indicated during docetaxel cycles
    van Dooijeweert, C.
    van der Wall, E.
    Baas, I. O.
    NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 77 (09) : 310 - 316