Wound infiltration with ropivacaine and fentanyl:: Effects on postoperative pain and PONV after breast surgery

被引:29
作者
Johansson, A [1 ]
Kornfält, J [1 ]
Nordin, L [1 ]
Svensson, L [1 ]
Ingvar, C [1 ]
Lundberg, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lund Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care, S-22185 Lund, Sweden
关键词
anesthetic technique; wound infiltration; local anesthetics;
D O I
10.1016/S0952-8180(02)00511-1
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study Objective: To determine whether Postoperative wound infiltration with local anesthetics combined with fentanyl improves analgesia following breast surgery; and to investigate awakening and Postoperative nausea/vomiting. Design: Prospectively randomized clinical study. Setting: University hospital. Patients: 45 ASA physical status I and II patients scheduled for breast surgery. Interventions: Patients were prospectively randomized and assigned to one of three treatments during general anesthesia: postsurgical wound infiltration with ropivacaine 0.375%; wound infiltration with ropivacaine 0.375% combined with fentanyl 0.5 mug/kg; and intravenous (IV) fentanyl 0.5 mug/kg before skin incision and no wound infiltration. Time to first verbal response, Pain at rest, Postoperative nausea and vomiting, and ketobemidone and dixyrazine utilization were compared. Measurements and Main Results: Time to first verbal response was significantly shorter in the IV fentanyl group compared to both infiltration groups (8.1 +/- 4.5 min vs. 15.3 +/- 4.3, and 12.0 +/- 5.0 min; p < 0.05, respectively). Postoperative Pain at rest, and nausea and vomiting occurred with similar frequencies in the groups. Ketobemidone utilization in both infiltration groups, (2.4 +/- 1.8 mg and 3.1 +/- 1.8 mg, respectively) was not different compared to the IV fentanyl group (2.9 +/- 2.0 mg; NS). There were no differences in Postoperative antiemetic requirements during the first, second and third two-hour periods postoperatively. The dixyrazine consumption was similar in the three groups, (0.9 +/- 1.5 mg, 0.8 +/- 1.3 mg, and 1.4 +/- 1.8 mg, respectively; NS). Conclusion: Postsurgical ropivacaine wound infiltration, with or without adding fentanyl, demonstrates no differences in postoperative Pain relief and nausea/vomiting compared to a balanced general anesthetic including IV fentanyl. (C) 2003 by Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 118
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
CAMU F, 1992, EUR J ANAESTH, P25
[2]  
DOUGLAS GA, 1980, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V281, P1336
[3]   Infiltration of morphine into an abdominal wound;: effects on pain relief and endocrine/immune response [J].
Eriksson-Mjöberg, M ;
Kristiansson, M ;
Carlström, K ;
Ölund, A ;
Eklund, J .
PAIN, 1997, 73 (03) :355-360
[4]  
Fujii Y, 1998, ACTA ANAESTH SCAND, V42, P220
[5]  
Fujii Y, 1997, ACTA ANAESTH SCAND, V41, P1167
[6]   Double-blind, randomized comparison of ondansetron and intraoperative propofol to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting [J].
Gan, TJ ;
Ginsberg, B ;
Grant, AP ;
Glass, PSA .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 85 (05) :1036-1042
[7]   PREMEDICATION BEFORE ELECTIVE BREAST SURGERY, A COMPARISON BETWEEN KETOBEMIDONE AND MIDAZOLAM [J].
JAKOBSSON, J ;
ANDERSSON, L ;
NILSSON, A ;
DAVIDSON, S ;
ASKERGREN, J .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1991, 35 (06) :524-528
[8]   Preoperative ropivacaine infiltration in breast surgery [J].
Johansson, A ;
Axelson, J ;
Ingvar, C ;
Luttropp, HH ;
Lundberg, J .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2000, 44 (09) :1093-1098
[9]  
JORIS JL, 1987, ANESTH ANALG, V66, P1277
[10]   A survey of postoperative nausea and vomiting [J].
Koivuranta, M ;
Laara, E ;
Snare, L ;
Alahuhta, S .
ANAESTHESIA, 1997, 52 (05) :443-449