Postoperative analgesia by intra-articular neostigmine in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy

被引:62
作者
Yang, LC
Chen, LM
Wang, CJ
Buerkle, H
机构
[1] Univ Munster, Klin & Poliklin Anaesthesiol & Operat Intens Med, Dept Anaesthesiol & Operat Intens Care Med, D-48219 Munster, Germany
[2] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Pain Res & Pain Clin, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
关键词
cholinesterase inhibitor; muscarinic; neostigmine; peripheral;
D O I
10.1097/00000542-199802000-00010
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Recently, the spinal administration of neostigmine was shown to produce a dose-dependent analgesia. However, this analgesia is limited by adverse effects, The purpose of this study was to examine the analgesic action of peripheral muscarinic receptors by administering intra-articular neostigmine after operation in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy Methods: Sixty patients (classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists status I or II) having arthroscopic meniscus repair during general anesthesia were randomized to receive, in a double-blind manner, after operation 125, 250, or 500 mu g intra-articular neostigmine; 2 mg intra-articular morphine; or as control groups intra-articular saline or 500 pg neostigmine given subcutaneously (SC), Visual analog pain scores (VAS), duration of analgesia as defined by first demand for patient-controlled analgesia by morphine, and subsequent 48-h consumption of morphine were evaluated, Results: Intra-articular (500 mu g) neostigmine resulted in significant VAS reduction 1 h after injection compared with patients given intra-articular saline and with those given intraarticular morphine, Analgesia lasted longer after 500 pg intra-articular neostigmine (350 +/- 126 min) compared with intraarticular morphine (196 +/- 138 min; P < 0.05) or with the control groups (intra-articular saline, 51 +/- 11 min; SC neostigmine, 46 +/- 8 min; P < 0,05). The need for supplementary analgesia was significantly higher in control groups than for patients given intra-articular morphine or 500 mu g intra-articular neostigmine, No significant analgesic effects were observed for the two lower doses of intra-articular neostigmine. Among all study groups, no adverse effects were observed. Conclusions: Intra-articular Injection of the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor neostigmine produced a moderate but significant analgesic effect. Several mechanisms such as the hyperpolarization of neurons, reduction in the release of pronoclceptive neurotransmitters, or activation of the nitric oxide-cyclic guanosine monophosphate pathway might mediate this peripheral cholinergic antinociception by elevating endogenous acetylcholine.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 339
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
ANTONIJEVIC I, 1995, J NEUROSCI, V15, P165
[2]   TOPOGRAPHY OF CHOLINE-ACETYLTRANSFERASE IMMUNOREACTIVE NEURONS AND FIBERS IN THE RAT SPINAL-CORD [J].
BORGES, LF ;
IVERSEN, SD .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1986, 362 (01) :140-148
[3]   POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA FROM INTRATHECAL NEOSTIGMINE IN SHEEP [J].
BOUAZIZ, H ;
TONG, CY ;
EISENACH, JC .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 80 (06) :1140-1144
[4]  
DETWEILER DJ, 1993, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V265, P536
[5]   PERIPHERAL ANALGESIA AND ACTIVATION OF THE NITRIC OXIDE-CYCLIC GMP PATHWAY [J].
DUARTE, IDG ;
LORENZETTI, BB ;
FERREIRA, SH .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1990, 186 (2-3) :289-293
[6]   PROSTAGLANDIN HYPERALGESIA .1. CAMP-CA2+ DEPENDENT PROCESS [J].
FERREIRA, SH ;
NAKAMURA, M .
PROSTAGLANDINS, 1979, 18 (02) :179-190
[7]   Peripheral analgesic effect of intra-articular clonidine [J].
Gentili, M ;
Juhel, A ;
Bonnet, F .
PAIN, 1996, 64 (03) :593-596
[8]  
GILLBERG PG, 1985, ACTA NEUROL SCAND, V72, P299
[9]   INFLAMMATION OF THE RAT PAW ENHANCES AXONAL-TRANSPORT OF OPIOID RECEPTORS IN THE SCIATIC-NERVE AND INCREASES THEIR DENSITY IN THE INFLAMED TISSUE [J].
HASSAN, AHS ;
ABLEITNER, A ;
STEIN, C ;
HERZ, A .
NEUROSCIENCE, 1993, 55 (01) :185-195
[10]   PHASE-I SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF INTRATHECAL NEOSTIGMINE METHYLSULFATE IN HUMANS [J].
HOOD, DD ;
EISENACH, JC ;
TUTTLE, R .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1995, 82 (02) :331-343