Data-Driven Calibration of Rough Heat Transfer Prediction Using Bayesian Inversion and Genetic Algorithm

被引:6
作者
Ignatowicz, Kevin [1 ]
Solai, Elie [2 ]
Morency, Francois [1 ]
Beaugendre, Heloise [3 ]
机构
[1] Ecole Technol Super, Mech Engn Dept, Montreal, PQ H3C 1K3, Canada
[2] Inst Natl Rech Informat & Automat INRIA, F-33405 Talence, France
[3] Univ Bordeaux, IMB, Bordeaux INP, CNRS,UMR 5251,INRIA, F-33400 Talence, France
关键词
Bayesian inversion; genetic algorithm; data-driven analysis; calibration; rough heat transfers; computational fluid dynamics; UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION; POLYNOMIAL CHAOS; TURBULENCE MODEL; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.3390/en15103793
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The prediction of heat transfers in Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations requires corrections for rough surfaces. The turbulence models are adapted to cope with surface roughness impacting the near-wall behaviour compared to a smooth surface. These adjustments in the models correctly predict the skin friction but create a tendency to overpredict the heat transfers compared to experiments. These overpredictions require the use of an additional thermal correction model to lower the heat transfers. Finding the correct numerical parameters to best fit the experimental results is non-trivial, since roughness patterns are often irregular. The objective of this paper is to develop a methodology to calibrate the roughness parameters for a thermal correction model for a rough curved channel test case. First, the design of the experiments allows the generation of metamodels for the prediction of the heat transfer coefficients. The polynomial chaos expansion approach is used to create the metamodels. The metamodels are then successively used with a Bayesian inversion and a genetic algorithm method to estimate the best set of roughness parameters to fit the available experimental results. Both calibrations are compared to assess their strengths and weaknesses. Starting with unknown roughness parameters, this methodology allows calibrating them and obtaining between 4.7% and 10% of average discrepancy between the calibrated RANS heat transfer prediction and the experimental results. The methodology is promising, showing the ability to finely select the roughness parameters to input in the numerical model to fit the experimental heat transfer, without an a priori knowledge of the actual roughness pattern.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Global Sensitivity Analysis, The Primer, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470725184
[2]   Improved heat transfer predictions on rough surfaces [J].
Aupoix, B. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND FLUID FLOW, 2015, 56 :160-171
[3]   Extensions of the Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model to account for wall roughness [J].
Aupoix, B ;
Spalart, PR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND FLUID FLOW, 2003, 24 (04) :454-462
[4]  
Blazek J., 2015, COMPUTATIONAL FLUID
[5]   Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications [J].
Celik, Ishmail B. ;
Ghia, Urmila ;
Roache, Patrick J. ;
Freitas, Christopher J. .
JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2008, 130 (07) :0780011-0780014
[6]   Sensitivity analysis of model output: Variance-based methods make the difference [J].
Chan, K ;
Saltelli, A ;
Tarantola, S .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1997 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE, 1997, :261-268
[7]   A GLOBALLY CONVERGENT AUGMENTED LAGRANGIAN ALGORITHM FOR OPTIMIZATION WITH GENERAL CONSTRAINTS AND SIMPLE BOUNDS [J].
CONN, AR ;
GOULD, NIM ;
TOINT, PL .
SIAM JOURNAL ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, 1991, 28 (02) :545-572
[8]   Uncertainty Quantification for Airfoil Icing Using Polynomial Chaos Expansions [J].
DeGennaro, Anthony M. ;
Rowley, Clarence W. ;
Martinelli, Luigi .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2015, 52 (05) :1404-1411
[9]  
DIRLING R., 1973, 8 THERMOPHYS C AM I, DOI DOI 10.2514/6.1973-763
[10]   Experimental heat transfer coefficients from ice-roughened surfaces for aircraft deicing design [J].
Dukhan, N ;
Masiulaniec, KC ;
De Witt, KJ ;
Van Fossen, GJ .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 1999, 36 (06) :948-956