Background noise lowers the performance of anaesthesiology residents' clinical reasoning when measured by script concordance A randomised crossover volunteer study

被引:20
作者
Enser, Maya [1 ]
Moriceau, Jerome [1 ]
Abily, Julien [1 ]
Damm, Cedric [1 ]
Occhiali, Emilie [1 ]
Besnier, Emmanuel [1 ]
Clavier, Thomas [1 ]
Lefevre-Scelles, Antoine [1 ]
Dureuil, Bertrand [1 ]
Compere, Vincent [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Rouen Univ Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Mont St Aignan, France
[2] Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, INSERM, U982, Mont St Aignan, France
关键词
PRACTICE EXCHANGE GROUPS; OPERATING-ROOM; NOVICE SURGEONS; SOUND LEVELS; TOOL; VALIDATION; DISTRACTIONS; ANESTHETISTS; GUIDELINES; MUSIC;
D O I
10.1097/EJA.0000000000000624
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Noise, which is omnipresent in operating rooms and ICUs, may have a negative impact not only patients but also on the concentration of and communication between clinical staff. OBJECTIVE The present study attempted to evaluate the impact of noise on the performance of anaesthesiology residents' clinical reasoning. Changes in clinical reasoning were measured by script concordance tests (SCTs). DESIGN This was a randomised and crossover study. SETTING Single centre at Rouen University Hospital in April 2014. POPULATION All year 1 to 4 residents enrolled in the anaesthesiology training programme were included. INTERVENTION Performance was assessed using a 56item SCT. Two resident groups were formed, and each was exposed to both quiet and noisy atmospheres during SCT assessment. Group A did the first part of the assessment (28 SCT) in a quiet atmosphere and the second part (28 SCT) in a noisy atmosphere. Group B did the same in reverse order. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome of this study was residents' performance as measured by SCT, with and without noise (mean of 100 points 95% confidence interval). RESULTS Forty-two residents were included. Residents' performance, measured by SCT, was weaker in a noisy environment than in a quiet environment [59.0 (56.0 to 62.0) vs 62.8 (60.8 to 64.9), P = 0.04]. This difference lessened as medical training advanced, as this difference in performance in noisy vs quiet environments was not observed in year 3 and 4 residents [62.9 (59.2 to 66.5) vs 64.0 (61.9 to 66.1), P = 0.60], whereas it was higher for year 1 and 2 residents [54.8 (50.6 to 59.1) vs 61.5 (57.9 to 65.1), P = 0.02]. CONCLUSION Our study suggests that noise affects clinical reasoning of anaesthesiology residents especially junior residents when measured by SCT. This observation supports the hypothesis that noise should be prevented in operating rooms especially when junior residents are providing care.
引用
收藏
页码:464 / 470
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
[21]   The effect of music on anaesthetists' psychomotor performance [J].
Hawksworth, CRE ;
Sivalingam, P ;
Asbury, AJ .
ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 53 (02) :195-197
[22]   The Practicum Script Concordance Test: An Online Continuing Professional Development Format to Foster Reflection on Clinical Practice [J].
Hornos, Eduardo H. ;
Pleguezuelos, Eduardo M. ;
Brailovsky, Carlos A. ;
Harillo, Leandro D. ;
Dory, Valerie ;
Charlin, Bernard .
JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2013, 33 (01) :59-66
[23]   Measuring Gains in the Clinical Reasoning of Medical Students: Longitudinal Results From a School-Wide Script Concordance Test [J].
Humbert, Aloysius J. ;
Miech, Edward J. .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2014, 89 (07) :1046-1050
[24]   Online Script Concordance Test for Clinical Reasoning Assessment in Otorhinolaryngology The Association Between Performance and Clinical Experience [J].
Kania, Romain E. ;
Verillaud, Benjamin ;
Tran, Hugo ;
Gagnon, Robert ;
Kazitani, Driss ;
Huy, Patrice Tran Ba ;
Herman, Philippe ;
Charlin, Bernard .
ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2011, 137 (08) :751-755
[25]   Noise in the Operating Room [J].
Katz, Jonathan D. .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2014, 121 (04) :894-898
[26]   Noise in the operating rooms of Johns Hopkins hospital [J].
Kracht, Jonathan M. ;
Busch-Vishniac, Ilene J. ;
West, James E. .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2007, 121 (05) :2673-2680
[27]  
Labelle M, 2003, PEDAG MED, V4, P145
[28]   The script concordance test in radiation oncology: validation study of a new tool to assess clinical reasoning [J].
Lambert, Carole ;
Gagnon, Robert ;
Nguyen, David ;
Charlin, Bernard .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2009, 4
[29]   Script concordance testing: From theory to practice: AMEE Guide No. 75 [J].
Lubarsky, Stuart ;
Dory, Valerie ;
Duggan, Paul ;
Gagnon, Robert ;
Charlin, Bernard .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2013, 35 (03) :184-193
[30]   Script concordance testing: a review of published validity evidence [J].
Lubarsky, Stuart ;
Charlin, Bernard ;
Cook, David A. ;
Chalk, Colin ;
van der Vleuten, Cees P. M. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2011, 45 (04) :329-338