Stress concentration effects of undercut defect and reinforcement metal in butt welded joint

被引:68
作者
Cerit, M. [1 ]
Kokumer, O. [1 ]
Genel, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sakarya Univ, Dept Mech Engn, TR-54187 Adapazari, Turkey
关键词
Welding; Defect; Stress concentration; Finite element; LIFE;
D O I
10.1016/j.engfailanal.2009.10.010
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
In the present study, stress distribution of butt welded joints with various amounts of reinforcement metal and undercut defect has been investigated under uniaxial tension for a full penetration by systematically conducting a series of two-dimensional finite element (FE) models. The FE analysis indicated that the amount of reinforcement metal in weld zone has an important effect on stress distribution. For 120 degrees of the reinforcement angle that designating reinforcement metal in weld joint, and 0.5 mm of toe radius, the value of stress concentration factor (SCF) exceeds 3.3 sigma(0). The analyses show that SCF takes much higher values in both low reinforcement angle and ratio of toe radius to plate thickness (R/t). As for joints with undercut defects, it is concluded that severity of SCF is mainly controlled by the ratio of depth to radius of undercut (h/r) and width (W). In addition to undercut defect, the presence of reinforcement metal, SCF noticeably increases with decreasing the reinforcement angle; it attains maximum value (7.4 sigma(0)) for h/r = 5 and W = 3 mm. However, for the joints having wider undercut defects, the influence of reinforcement metal on SCF is found to be relatively lower; SCF is 6.7 sigma(0) for W = 6 mm. Finally, an attempt has been made to construct simple relationships among the SCF of the weld joint, reinforcement angle, undercut defect and dimensionless parameters defining weld toe detail. Crown Copyright (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:571 / 578
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1995, MET HDB ASM INT MET, V11
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2000, J ENG MATER-T ASME, DOI DOI 10.1115/1.3225026
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1991, WELD HDB AM WELD SOC
  • [4] *ASM INT MET PARK, 1995, MET HDB ASM INT MET, V6
  • [5] Dowling N.E., 1993, MECH BEHAV MAT, Vfirst
  • [6] In-service fatigue failure of engineered products and structures - Case study review
    Gagg, Colin R.
    Lewis, Peter R.
    [J]. ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2009, 16 (06) : 1775 - 1793
  • [7] Ho N.-J., 1984, Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, V1, P3, DOI 10.1016/0167-8442(84)90018-1
  • [8] Kirkhope K.J., 1999, MAR STRUCT, V12, P447, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0951-8339(99)00013-1
  • [9] NIUE X, 1987, INT J FRACTURE, V35, P3
  • [10] Pilkey W. D., 2020, PETERSONS STRESS CON