A COMPREHENSIVE METHOD OF ESTIMATING ELECTRIC FIELDS FROM VECTOR MAGNETIC FIELD AND DOPPLER MEASUREMENTS

被引:57
作者
Kazachenko, Maria D. [1 ]
Fisher, George H. [1 ]
Welsch, Brian T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Space Sci Lab, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
magnetic fields; Sun: evolution; Sun: flares; Sun: fundamental parameters; Sun: photosphere; sunspots; LOCAL CORRELATION TRACKING; MINIMUM ENERGY FIT; INDUCTION EQUATION; CONVECTION ZONE; SOLAR CORONA; FLUX TUBES; HELICITY; MAGNETOGRAMS; VELOCITY; FLARES;
D O I
10.1088/0004-637X/795/1/17
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Photospheric electric fields, estimated from sequences of vector magnetic field and Doppler measurements, can be used to estimate the flux of magnetic energy (the Poynting flux) into the corona and as time-dependent boundary conditions for dynamic models of the coronal magnetic field. We have modified and extended an existing method to estimate photospheric electric fields that combines a poloidal-toroidal decomposition (PTD) of the evolving magnetic field vector with Doppler and horizontal plasma velocities. Our current, more comprehensive method, which we dub the "PTD-Doppler-FLCT Ideal" (PDFI) technique, can now incorporate Doppler velocities from non-normal viewing angles. It uses the FISHPACK software package to solve several two-dimensional Poisson equations, a faster and more robust approach than our previous implementations. Here, we describe systematic, quantitative tests of the accuracy and robustness of the PDFI technique using synthetic data from anelastic MHD (ANMHD) simulations, which have been used in similar tests in the past. We find that the PDFI method has less than 1% error in the total Poynting flux and a 10% error in the helicity flux rate at a normal viewing angle (theta = 0) and less than 25% and 10% errors, respectively, at large viewing angles (theta < 60 degrees). We compare our results with other inversion methods at zero viewing angle and find that our method's estimates of the fluxes of magnetic energy and helicity are comparable to or more accurate than other methods. We also discuss the limitations of the PDFI method and its uncertainties.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 38 条
[11]   The rise of kink-unstable magnetic flux tubes and the origin of δ-configuration sunspots [J].
Fan, Y ;
Zweibel, EG ;
Linton, MG ;
Fisher, GH .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 521 (01) :460-477
[12]  
Finn J. M., 1985, Comments on Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, V9, P111
[13]  
Fisher GH, 2008, ASTR SOC P, V383, P373
[14]   Can We Determine Electric Fields and Poynting Fluxes from Vector Magnetograms and Doppler Measurements? [J].
Fisher, G. H. ;
Welsch, B. T. ;
Abbett, W. P. .
SOLAR PHYSICS, 2012, 277 (01) :153-163
[15]   ESTIMATING ELECTRIC FIELDS FROM VECTOR MAGNETOGRAM SEQUENCES [J].
Fisher, G. H. ;
Welsch, B. T. ;
Abbett, W. P. ;
Bercik, D. J. .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 715 (01) :242-259
[16]  
Hurlburt N. E., 1995, ESA SPECIAL PUBLICAT, V376, P239
[17]   STARK-EFFECT AT THE SI-I SERIES LIMIT [J].
JORDAN, C ;
BARTOE, JDF ;
BRUECKNER, GE .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1980, 240 (02) :702-&
[18]   SUNSPOT ROTATION, FLARE ENERGETICS, AND FLUX ROPE HELICITY: THE ERUPTIVE FLARE ON 2005 MAY 13 [J].
Kazachenko, Maria D. ;
Canfield, Richard C. ;
Longcope, Dana W. ;
Qiu, Jiong ;
DesJardins, Angela ;
Nightingale, Richard W. .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 704 (02) :1146-1158
[19]   Measurement of magnetic helicity injection and free energy loading into the solar corona [J].
Kusano, K ;
Maeshiro, T ;
Yokoyama, T ;
Sakurai, T .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 577 (01) :501-512
[20]   Anelastic magnetohydrodynamic equations for modeling solar and stellar convection zones [J].
Lantz, SR ;
Fan, Y .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 1999, 121 (01) :247-264