A review of equity in electricity tariffs in the renewable energy era

被引:38
作者
Ansarin, Mohammad [1 ]
Ghiassi-Farrokhfal, Yashar [1 ]
Ketter, Wolfgang [1 ,2 ]
Collins, John [3 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam Sch Management, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, NL-3062 PA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Cologne, Fac Management Econ & Social Sci, Pohligstr 1, D-50969 Cologne, Germany
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, 200 Union St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
Cross-subsidization; Electricity retail pricing; Equity; Fairness; Renewable energy; Subsidies; Tariffs; FEED-IN TARIFFS; RESIDENTIAL SOLAR PV; DISTRIBUTED GENERATION; WEALTH TRANSFERS; CROSS-SUBSIDIES; NETWORK TARIFFS; GRID COSTS; IMPACTS; EFFICIENCY; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2022.112333
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The rapid growth of distributed renewable energy sources has increased concerns about the fairness of electricity pricing, particularly in the residential sector. Hence, many recent studies have focused on topics of equity in residential electricity tariffs. This paper reviews such studies and places them in a historical context of the study of electricity tariffs and the study of pricing fairness. Studies of scenarios with attention to distributed renewables growth tend to focus primarily on one of three matters: (a) normative concerns, (b) quantifying tariff (or more generally, policy) fairness, and (c) quantifying the transitional fairness of pricing decisions over multi-year timespans. After the review, research gaps in each category are illustrated. This paper also provides stringent comparisons of common methodological choices regarding their influence on fairness calculations. These comparisons highlight choices that ensure rigor and comparability in future studies of tariff fairness. This review provides researchers and policy-makers with a wider perspective of the current state of understanding of the effects of D-RES increases on distributional concerns in residential electricity pricing.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 140 条
[51]   EQUITY AND EFFICIENCY IN PUBLIC SECTOR PRICING - OPTIMAL 2-PART TARIFF [J].
FELDSTEIN, MS .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1972, 86 (02) :175-187
[52]   A generic economic framework for electric rate design with prosumers [J].
Fikru, Mahelet G. ;
Canfield, Casey I. .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2020, 211 :1325-1334
[53]  
Fontana AG, 2016, THESIS U LISBOA
[54]  
Franklin R, 2017, J POLIT ECOL, V24, P1055, DOI 10.2458/v24i1.22003
[55]   The impact of consumer advocates on regulatory policy in the electric utility sector [J].
Fremeth, Adam R. ;
Holburn, Guy L. F. ;
Spiller, Pablo T. .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 2014, 161 (1-2) :157-181
[56]   The burden of Germany's energy transition: An empirical analysis of distributional effects [J].
Frondel, Manuel ;
Sommer, Stephan ;
Vance, Colin .
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2015, 45 :89-99
[57]   Time-varying electricity pricing and consumer heterogeneity: Welfare and distributional effects with variable renewable supply [J].
Gambardella, Christian ;
Pahle, Michael .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2018, 76 :257-273
[58]   Optimal grid tariffs with heterogeneous prosumers [J].
Gautier, Axel ;
Jacqmin, Julien ;
Poudou, Jean-Christophe .
UTILITIES POLICY, 2021, 68
[59]   PV adoption: the role of distribution tariffs under net metering [J].
Gautier, Axel ;
Jacqmin, Julien .
JOURNAL OF REGULATORY ECONOMICS, 2020, 57 (01) :53-73
[60]   The prosumers and the grid [J].
Gautier, Axel ;
Jacqmin, Julien ;
Poudou, Jean-Christophe .
JOURNAL OF REGULATORY ECONOMICS, 2018, 53 (01) :100-126