A review of equity in electricity tariffs in the renewable energy era

被引:38
作者
Ansarin, Mohammad [1 ]
Ghiassi-Farrokhfal, Yashar [1 ]
Ketter, Wolfgang [1 ,2 ]
Collins, John [3 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam Sch Management, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, NL-3062 PA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Cologne, Fac Management Econ & Social Sci, Pohligstr 1, D-50969 Cologne, Germany
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, 200 Union St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
Cross-subsidization; Electricity retail pricing; Equity; Fairness; Renewable energy; Subsidies; Tariffs; FEED-IN TARIFFS; RESIDENTIAL SOLAR PV; DISTRIBUTED GENERATION; WEALTH TRANSFERS; CROSS-SUBSIDIES; NETWORK TARIFFS; GRID COSTS; IMPACTS; EFFICIENCY; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2022.112333
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The rapid growth of distributed renewable energy sources has increased concerns about the fairness of electricity pricing, particularly in the residential sector. Hence, many recent studies have focused on topics of equity in residential electricity tariffs. This paper reviews such studies and places them in a historical context of the study of electricity tariffs and the study of pricing fairness. Studies of scenarios with attention to distributed renewables growth tend to focus primarily on one of three matters: (a) normative concerns, (b) quantifying tariff (or more generally, policy) fairness, and (c) quantifying the transitional fairness of pricing decisions over multi-year timespans. After the review, research gaps in each category are illustrated. This paper also provides stringent comparisons of common methodological choices regarding their influence on fairness calculations. These comparisons highlight choices that ensure rigor and comparability in future studies of tariff fairness. This review provides researchers and policy-makers with a wider perspective of the current state of understanding of the effects of D-RES increases on distributional concerns in residential electricity pricing.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 140 条
[1]   Smart Electricity Meter Data Intelligence for Future Energy Systems: A Survey [J].
Alahakoon, Damminda ;
Yu, Xinghuo .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS, 2016, 12 (01) :425-436
[2]   Electricity provision with intermittent sources of energy [J].
Ambec, Stefan ;
Crampes, Claude .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2012, 34 (03) :319-336
[3]   Installing Photovoltaics in Germany: A license to print money? [J].
Andor, Mark ;
Frondel, Manuel ;
Vance, Colin .
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2015, 48 :106-116
[4]   Equity and the willingness to pay for green electricity in Germany [J].
Andor, Mark A. ;
Frondel, Manuel ;
Sommer, Stephan .
NATURE ENERGY, 2018, 3 (10) :876-881
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Electr. J., DOI DOI 10.1016/J.TEJ.2010.05.014
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, ELECT J, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.TEJ.2014.04.001
[7]   Cross-subsidies among residential electricity prosumers from tariff design andmetering infrastructure [J].
Ansarin, Mohammad ;
Ghiassi-Farrokhfal, Yashar ;
Ketter, Wolfgang ;
Collins, John .
ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 145
[8]   The economic consequences of electricity tariff design in a renewable energy era [J].
Ansarin, Mohammad ;
Ghiassi-Farrokhfal, Yashar ;
Ketter, Wolfgang ;
Collins, John .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 275
[9]  
Athawale R., 2016, Future of Utilities-Utilities of the future, P193, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-804249-6.00010-5, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-804249-6.00010-5]
[10]   Exploring the impact of network tariffs on household electricity expenditures using load profiles and socio-economic characteristics [J].
Azarova, Valeriya ;
Engel, Dominik ;
Ferner, Cornelia ;
Kollmann, Andrea ;
Reichl, Johannes .
NATURE ENERGY, 2018, 3 (04) :317-325