Model selection, confounder control, and marginal structural models: Review and new applications

被引:179
作者
Joffe, MM [1 ]
Ten Have, TR [1 ]
Feldman, HI [1 ]
Kimmel, SE [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
causality; prediction; weighting;
D O I
10.1198/000313004X5824
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
In traditional regression modeling, to control for confounding by a variable one must include it in the structural part of the statistical model. Marginal structural models are a flexible new set of causal models. The estimation methods used to estimate model parameters use weighting to control for confounding; this allows more flexibility in choosing covariates for inclusion in the structural model and allows the model to more precisely reflect the scientific questions of interest. An important example of this is in multicenter observational studies where there is confounding by cluster. We illustrate these points with data from a study of surgery to provide vascular access for hemodialysis and a study comparing different timings for coronary angioplasty.
引用
收藏
页码:272 / 279
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   An empirical comparison of several clustered data approaches under confounding due to cluster effects in the analysis of complications of coronary angioplasty [J].
Berlin, JA ;
Kimmel, SE ;
Ten Have, TR ;
Sammel, MD .
BIOMETRICS, 1999, 55 (02) :470-476
[2]  
Breslow NE, 1980, STAT METHODS CANC RE, V1, DOI DOI 10.1097/00002030-199912240-00009
[3]   Sensitivity analyses for unmeasured confounding assuming a marginal structural model for repeated measures [J].
Brumback, BA ;
Hernán, MA ;
Haneuse, SJPA ;
Robins, JM .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2004, 23 (05) :749-767
[4]   Effect of omitted confounders on the analysis of correlated binary data [J].
Chao, WH ;
Palta, M ;
Young, T .
BIOMETRICS, 1997, 53 (02) :678-689
[5]   Predictors of successful arteriovenous fistula maturation [J].
Feldman, HI ;
Joffe, M ;
Rosas, SE ;
Burns, E ;
Knauss, J ;
Brayman, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2003, 42 (05) :1000-1012
[6]   LARGE SAMPLE CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS FOR REGRESSION STANDARDIZED RISKS, RISK RATIOS, AND RISK DIFFERENCES [J].
FLANDERS, WD ;
RHODES, PH .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (07) :697-704
[7]   From association to causation: Some remarks on the history of statistics [J].
Freedman, D .
STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 1999, 14 (03) :243-258
[8]  
GREENLAND S, 1986, INT J EPIDEMIOL, V15, P412
[9]  
Harrell FE, 1996, STAT MED, V15, P361, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::AID-SIM168>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-4