Evolution of dispersal polymorphism and local adaptation of dispersal distance in spatially structured landscapes

被引:93
作者
Bonte, Dries [1 ]
Hovestadt, Thomas [2 ,3 ]
Poethke, Hans-Joachim [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Biol, BE-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Wurzburg, Field Stn Fabrikschleichach, DE-96181 Rauhenebrach, Germany
[3] Museum Natl Hist Nat, CNRS, Field Stn, UMR 7179, FR-91800 Brunoy, France
关键词
KIN SELECTION; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; REDUCED DISPERSAL; GENE FLOW; MODELS; MIGRATION; BEHAVIOR; PERSPECTIVES; EXTINCTION; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17943.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Many organisms show polymorphism in dispersal distance strategies. This variation is particularly ecological relevant if it encompasses a functional separation of short- (SDD) and long-distance dispersal (LDD). It remains, however, an open question whether both parts of the dispersal kernel are similarly affected by landscape related selection pressures. We implemented an individual-based model to analyze the evolution of dispersal traits in firactal landscapes that vary in the proportion of habitat and its spatial configuration. Individuals are parthenogenetic with dispersal distance determined by two alleles oil each individual's genome: one allele coding for the probability of global dispersal and one allele coding for the variance sigma of a Gaussian local dispersal with mean value zero. Simulations show that mean distances of local dispersal and the probability of global dispersal, increase with increasing habitat availability, but that changes in the habitats spatial autocorrelation impose opposing selective pressure: local dispersal distances decrease and global dispersal probabilities increase with decreasing spatial autocorrelation of the available habitat. Local adaptation of local dispersal distance emerges in landscapes with less than 70% of clumped habitat. These results demonstrate that long and short distance dispersal evolve separately according to different properties of the landscape. The landscape structure may consequently largely affect the evolution of dispersal distance strategies and the level of dispersal polymorphism.
引用
收藏
页码:560 / 566
页数:7
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Negative relationship between dispersal distance and demography in butterfly metapopulations [J].
Baguette, M ;
Schtickzelle, N .
ECOLOGY, 2006, 87 (03) :648-654
[2]   THE DESCRIPTIVE PROPERTIES OF SOME MODELS FOR DENSITY DEPENDENCE [J].
BELLOWS, TS .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1981, 50 (01) :139-156
[3]  
Billiard S, 2005, EVOLUTION, V59, P13
[4]   Thermal conditions during juvenile development affect adult dispersal in a spider [J].
Bonte, Dries ;
Travis, Justin M. J. ;
De Clercq, Nele ;
Zwertvaegher, Ingrid ;
Lens, Luc .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (44) :17000-17005
[5]   Aerial dispersal plasticity under different wind velocities in a salt marsh wolf spider [J].
Bonte, Dries ;
Bossuyt, Beatrijs ;
Lens, Luc .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2007, 18 (02) :438-443
[6]   Geographical variation in wolf spider dispersal behaviour is related to landscape structure [J].
Bonte, Dries ;
Vanden Borre, Jeroen ;
Lens, Luc ;
Maelfait, Jean-Pierre .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2006, 72 :655-662
[7]   Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics [J].
Bowler, DE ;
Benton, TG .
BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2005, 80 (02) :205-225
[8]   Rapid evolution of seed dispersal in an urban environment in the weed Crepis sancta [J].
Cheptou, P. -O. ;
Carrue, O. ;
Rouifed, S. ;
Cantarel, A. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (10) :3796-3799
[9]   Informed dispersal, heterogeneity in animal dispersal syndromes and the dynamics of spatially structured populations [J].
Clobert, Jean ;
Le Galliard, Jean-Francois ;
Cote, Julien ;
Meylan, Sandrine ;
Massot, Manuel .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2009, 12 (03) :197-209
[10]   Short-term evolution of reduced dispersal in island plant populations [J].
Cody, ML ;
Overton, JM .
JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1996, 84 (01) :53-61