Boundaries Between Research Ethics and Ethical Research Use in Artificial Intelligence Health Research

被引:22
作者
Samuel, Gabrielle [1 ]
Chubb, Jenn [2 ]
Derrick, Gemma [3 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Dept Global Hlth & Social Med, London, England
[2] Univ York, Dept Comp Sci, York, N Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Lancaster, Dept Educ Res, Lancaster, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 英国惠康基金;
关键词
responsible research; artificial intelligence; ethics; research ethics; privacy; health; responsible research and innovation; societal impact;
D O I
10.1177/15562646211002744
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The governance of ethically acceptable research in higher education institutions has been under scrutiny over the past half a century. Concomitantly, recently, decision makers have required researchers to acknowledge the societal impact of their research, as well as anticipate and respond to ethical dimensions of this societal impact through responsible research and innovation principles. Using artificial intelligence population health research in the United Kingdom and Canada as a case study, we combine a mapping study of journal publications with 18 interviews with researchers to explore how the ethical dimensions associated with this societal impact are incorporated into research agendas. Researchers separated the ethical responsibility of their research with its societal impact. We discuss the implications for both researchers and actors across the Ethics Ecosystem.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 337
页数:13
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, NATURE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, 1 INT WORKSH ART INT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, INCR EC IMP RES COUN
[4]   Adjusting the focus: A public health ethics approach to data research [J].
Ballantyne, Angela .
BIOETHICS, 2019, 33 (03) :357-366
[5]   Using Mobile Phone Data to Predict the Spatial Spread of Cholera [J].
Bengtsson, Linus ;
Gaudart, Jean ;
Lu, Xin ;
Moore, Sandra ;
Wetter, Erik ;
Sallah, Kankoe ;
Rebaudet, Stanislas ;
Piarroux, Renaud .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5
[6]   Accounting for ethos or programmes for conduct? The brave new world of research ethics committees [J].
Boden, Rebecca ;
Epstein, Debbie ;
Latimer, Joanna .
SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2009, 57 (04) :727-749
[7]  
Bodmer W. F, 1986, PUBLIC UNDERST SCI
[8]  
Brundage M, 2016, SYNTH LIBR, V376, P541, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26485-1_32
[9]  
Cave S., 2020, NARRATIVES HIST IMAG
[10]  
Chubb J, 2017, Instrumentalism and Epistemic Responsibility: Researchers and the Impact Agenda in the UK and Australia