Technology Credit Scoring Based on a Quantification Method

被引:10
作者
Ju, Yonghan [1 ]
Sohn, So Young [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Dept Informat & Ind Engn, 134 Shinchon Dong, Seoul 120749, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
quantification method; pattern recognition; technology credit guarantee fund; credit scoring; MODEL; INTERVAL; FIRMS; PREDICTION; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; FUND;
D O I
10.3390/su9061057
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Credit scoring models are usually formulated by fitting the probability of loan default as a function of individual evaluation attributes. Typically, these attributes are measured using a Likert-type scale, but are treated as interval scale explanatory variables to predict loan defaults. Existing models also do not distinguish between types of default, although they vary: default by an insolvent company and default by an insolvent debtor. This practice can bias the results. In this paper, we applied Quantification Method II, a categorical version of canonical correlation analysis, to determine the relationship between two sets of categorical variables: a set of default types and a set of evaluation attributes. We distinguished between two types of loan default patterns based on quantification scores. In the first set of quantification scores, we found knowledge management, new technology development, and venture registration as important predictors of default from non-default status. Based on the second quantification score, we found that the technology and profitability factors influence loan defaults due to an insolvent company. Finally, we proposed a credit-risk rating model based on the quantification score.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   CREDIT SCORING, STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES AND EVALUATION CRITERIA: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE [J].
Abdou, Hussein A. ;
Pointon, John .
INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS IN ACCOUNTING FINANCE & MANAGEMENT, 2011, 18 (2-3) :59-88
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1950, ANN I STAT MATH, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02919500
[3]  
Bates T., 1989, Journal of Small Business Management, V27, P1
[4]   PREDICTION OF VARICEAL HEMORRHAGE BY ESOPHAGEAL ENDOSCOPY [J].
BEPPU, K ;
INOKUCHI, K ;
KOYANAGI, N ;
NAKAYAMA, S ;
SAKATA, H ;
KITANO, S ;
KOBAYASHI, M .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1981, 27 (04) :213-218
[5]   A more complete conceptual framework for SME finance [J].
Berger, Allen N. ;
Udell, Gregory F. .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2006, 30 (11) :2945-2966
[6]  
BERGER AN, 2002, 20026 FED RES BANK A
[7]   Parameterizing credit risk models with rating data [J].
Carey, M ;
Hrycay, M .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2001, 25 (01) :197-270
[8]   SOME EMPIRICAL TESTS IN THE ARBITRAGE PRICING THEORY - MACROVARIABLES VS DERIVED FACTORS [J].
CHEN, SJ ;
JORDAN, BD .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 1993, 17 (01) :65-89
[9]   Impact analysis for national R&D funding in science and technology using quantification method II [J].
Choi, Jin Young ;
Lee, Jong Ha ;
Sohn, So Young .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (10) :1534-1544
[10]  
Churchill B.C., 1952, Survey of Current Business, P12