The value of GRASP on DCE-MRI for assessing response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer

被引:5
作者
Lu, Yanan [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Ling [3 ]
Qin, Jianjun [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Wang, Zhaoqi [1 ,2 ]
Guo, Jia [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Yan [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Hongkai [1 ,2 ]
Yan, Xu [6 ]
Liu, Hui [1 ,2 ]
Li, Hailiang [1 ,2 ]
Kamel, Ihab R. [7 ]
Qu, Jinrong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Dept Radiol, Affiliated Canc Hosp, 127 Dongming Rd, Zhengzhou 450008, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Henan Canc Hosp, 127 Dongming Rd, Zhengzhou 450008, Henan, Peoples R China
[3] GE Healthcare, Adv Applicat Team, 1 Hua Tuo Rd,Zhangjiang Hitech Pk, Shanghai 201203, Peoples R China
[4] Zhengzhou Univ, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Dept Thorac Surg, 127 Dongming Rd, Zhengzhou 450008, Henan, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Natl Canc Ctr, Canc Hosp, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
[6] Siemens Ltd, NEA MR Collaborat, 278 Zhouzhu Rd, Shanghai 201318, Peoples R China
[7] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Esophageal Cancer; Treatment outcome; Chemotherapy; Neoadjuvant therapy; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; CONTRAST-ENHANCED MRI; PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY; SALVAGE ESOPHAGECTOMY; PATHOLOGICAL RESPONSE; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; TUMOR-REGRESSION; F-18-FDG PET; CT-PET;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-019-6247-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background To compare the value of two dynamic contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Images (DCE-MRI) reconstruction approaches, namely golden-angle radial sparse parallel (GRASP) and view-sharing with golden-angle radial profile (VS-GR) reconstruction, and evaluate their values in assessing response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) in patients with esophageal cancer (EC). Methods EC patients receiving nCT before surgery were enrolled prospectively. DCE-MRI scanning was performed after nCT and within 1 week before surgery. Tumor Regression Grade (TRG) was used for chemotherapy response evaluation, and patients were stratified into a responsive group (TRG1 + 2) and a non-responsive group (TRG3 + 4 + 5). Wilcoxon test was utilized for comparing GRASP and VS-GR reconstruction, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney test was performed for each parameter to assess response, and Spearman test was performed for analyzing correlation between parameters and TRGs, as well as responder and non-responder. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was utilized for each significant parameter to assess its accuracy between responders and non-responders. Results Among the 64 patients included in this cohort (52 male, 12 female; average age of 59.1 +/- 7.9 years), 4 patients showed TRG1, 4 patients were TRG2, 7 patients were TRG3, 11 patients were TRG4, and 38 patients were TRG5. They were stratified into 8 responders and 56 non-responders. A total of 15 parameters were calculated from each tumor. With VS-GR, 10/15 parameters significantly correlated with TRG and response groups. Of these, only AUCmax showed moderate correlation with TRG, 7 showed low correlation and 2 showed negligible correlation with TRG. 8 showed low correlation and 2 showed negligible correlation with response groups. With GRASP, 13/15 parameters significantly correlated with TRG and response groups. Of these, 10 showed low correlation and 3 showed negligible correlation with TRG. 11 showed low correlation and 2 showed negligible correlation with TRG. Seven parameters (AUC* > 0.70, P < 0.05) showed good performance in response groups. Conclusions In patients with esophageal cancer on neoadjuvant chemotherapy, several parameters can differentiate responders from non-responders, using both GRASP and VS-GR techniques. GRASP may be able to better differentiate these two groups compared to VS-GR. Trial registration for this prospective study: ChiCTR, ChiCTR-DOD-14005308. Registered 2 October 2014.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] A Randomized Trial Comparing Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy with Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil Versus Preoperative Chemotherapy for Localized Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Thoracic Esophagus (JCOG9907)
    Ando, Nobutoshi
    Kato, Hoichi
    Igaki, Hiroyasu
    Shinoda, Masayuki
    Ozawa, Soji
    Shimizu, Hideaki
    Nakamura, Tsutomu
    Yabusaki, Hiroshi
    Aoyama, Norio
    Kurita, Akira
    Ikeda, Kenichiro
    Kanda, Tatsuo
    Tsujinaka, Toshimasa
    Nakamura, Kenichi
    Fukuda, Haruhiko
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (01) : 68 - 74
  • [2] Quantitative Perfusion Analysis of the Rectum Using Golden-Angle Radial Sparse Parallel Magnetic Resonance Imaging Initial Experience and Comparison to Time-Resolved Angiography With Interleaved Stochastic Trajectories
    Attenberger, Ulrike I.
    Liu, Jing
    Riffel, Philipp
    Budjan, Johannes
    Grimm, Robert
    Block, Kai T.
    Schoenberg, Stefan O.
    Wang, Xiaoying
    Hausmann, Daniel
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2017, 52 (12) : 715 - 724
  • [3] Acceleration techniques and their impact on arterial input function sampling: Non-accelerated versus view-sharing and compressed sensing sequences
    Benz, Matthias R.
    Bongartz, Georg
    Froehlich, Johannes M.
    Winkel, David
    Boll, Daniel T.
    Heye, Tobias
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 104 : 8 - 13
  • [4] Health-related quality of life during neoadjuvant treatment and surgery for localized esophageal carcinoma
    Blazeby, JM
    Sanford, E
    Falk, SJ
    Alderson, D
    Donovan, JL
    [J]. CANCER, 2005, 103 (09) : 1791 - 1799
  • [5] Free-Breathing Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Rat Liver Tumor Model Using Dynamic Radial T1 Mapping
    Braren, Rickmer
    Curcic, Jelena
    Remmele, Stefanie
    Altomonte, Jennifer
    Ebert, Oliver
    Rummeny, Ernst J.
    Steingoetter, Andreas
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2011, 46 (10) : 624 - 631
  • [6] Free-Breathing Contrast-Enhanced Multiphase MRI of the Liver Using a Combination of Compressed Sensing, Parallel Imaging, and Golden-Angle Radial Sampling
    Chandarana, Hersh
    Feng, Li
    Block, Tobias K.
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Lim, Ruth P.
    Babb, James S.
    Sodickson, Daniel K.
    Otazo, Ricardo
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2013, 48 (01) : 10 - 16
  • [7] Prognostic significance of PET assessment of metabolic response to therapy in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Chhabra, Arpit
    Ong, Leonard T.
    Kuk, Deborah
    Ku, Geoffrey
    Ilson, David
    Janjigian, Yelena Y.
    Wu, Abraham
    Schoeder, Heiko
    Goodman, Karyn A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 113 (12) : 1658 - 1665
  • [8] Value of DCE-MRI for staging and response evaluation in rectal cancer: A systematic review
    Dijkhoff, Rebecca A. P.
    Beets-Tan, Regina G. H.
    Lambregts, Doenja M. J.
    Beets, Geerard L.
    Maas, Monique
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 95 : 155 - 168
  • [9] Value of CT-PET after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in the prediction of histological tumour regression, nodal status and survival in oesophageal adenocarcinoma
    Elliott, J. A.
    O'Farrell, N. J.
    King, S.
    Halpenny, D.
    Malik, V.
    Muldoon, C.
    Johnston, C.
    Reynolds, J. V.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 101 (13) : 1702 - 1711
  • [10] Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for treatment response assessment in patients with oesophageal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
    Heethuis, Sophie E.
    van Rossum, Peter S. N.
    Lips, Irene M.
    Goense, Lucas
    Voncken, Francine E.
    Reerink, Onne
    van Hillegersberg, Richard
    Ruurda, Jelle P.
    Philippens, Marielle E.
    van Vulpen, Marco
    Meijer, Gert J.
    Lagendijk, Jan J. W.
    van Lier, Astrid L. H. M. W.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 120 (01) : 128 - 135