A prospective study of the impact of genetic susceptibility testing for BRCA1/2 or HNPCC on family relationships

被引:38
作者
van Oostrom, Iris
Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne
Duivenvoorden, Hugo J.
Brocker-Vriends, Annette H. J. T.
van Asperen, Chhstl J.
Sijmons, Rolf H.
Seynaeve, Caroline
Van Gool, Arthur R.
Klijn, Jan G. M.
Riedijk, Samantha R.
van Dooren, Silvia
Tibben, Aad
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Genet, NL-3016 AH Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med Psychol & Psychotherapy, NL-3016 AH Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Ctr Human & Clin Genet, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Univ Groningen, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Genet, NL-9700 AB Groningen, Netherlands
[5] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Daniel Den Hoed Canc Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, NL-3016 AH Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Daniel Den Hoed Canc Ctr, Dept Psychiat, NL-3016 AH Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
hereditary cancer; oncology; genetic screening; family relationships; psychological functioning;
D O I
10.1002/pon.1062
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This study assessed the impact of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility on family relationships and determinants of adverse consequences for family relationships. Applicants for genetic testing of a known familial pathogenic mutation in BRCA1/2 or a HNPCC related gene (N = 271) rated the prevalence and nature of changes in family relationships, familial difficulties and conflicts due to genetic testing 6 months after receiving the test result. The level of family functioning, differentiation from parents, support and familial communication style regarding hereditary cancer were assessed before receiving the test result. Genetic testing affected some family relationships in a positive way (37%), i.e. by feeling closer, improved communication and support, more appreciation of the relative and relief of negative test result. A minority reported unwanted changes in relationships (19%), problematic situations (13%) or conflicts (4%). Adverse effects comprised feelings of guilt towards children and carrier siblings, imposed secrecy and communication problems. Predictors of adverse consequences on family relationships were reluctance to communicate about hereditary cancer with relatives and disengaged-rigid or enmeshed-chaotic family functioning. Open communication between relatives should be stimulated because a lack of open communication may be an important determinant of familial adverse effects. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 328
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] THE DIFFERENTIATION IN THE FAMILY SYSTEM SCALE (DIFS)
    ANDERSON, SA
    SABATELLI, RM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF FAMILY THERAPY, 1992, 20 (01) : 77 - 89
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1989, Applied Logistic Regression
  • [3] [Anonymous], FACES
  • [4] Bernhardt BA, 2000, AM J MED GENET, V94, P189, DOI 10.1002/1096-8628(20000918)94:3<189::AID-AJMG3>3.0.CO
  • [5] 2-E
  • [6] Bowen M., 1978, Family therapy in clinical practice
  • [7] BUURMEIER FA, 1988, GEZINS DIMENSIE SCHA
  • [8] Claes E, 2005, J Genet Couns, V14, P349, DOI 10.1007/s10897-005-1371-4
  • [9] Predictive testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: Subjective perception regarding colorectal and endometrial cancer, distress, and health-related behavior at one year post-test
    Claes, E
    Denayer, L
    Evers-Kiebooms, G
    Boogaerts, A
    Philippe, K
    Tejpar, S
    Devriendt, K
    Legius, E
    [J]. GENETIC TESTING, 2005, 9 (01): : 54 - 65
  • [10] Communicating genetic test results to the family: A six-step, skills-building strategy
    Daly, MB
    Barsevick, A
    Miller, SM
    Buckman, R
    Costalas, J
    Montgomery, S
    Bingler, R
    [J]. FAMILY & COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2001, 24 (03) : 13 - 26