Agenda setting for essential medicines policy in sub-Saharan Africa: a retrospective policy analysis using Kingdon's multiple streams model

被引:9
作者
Mhazo, Alison T. [1 ]
Maponga, Charles C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Minist Hlth, Community Hlth Sci Unit CHSU, Private Bag 65,Area 3, Lilongwe, Malawi
[2] Univ Zimbabwe, Dept Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, POB A178, Avondale, Zimbabwe
关键词
Agenda setting; Essential medicines; Policy analysis; Kingdon’ s model; Primary healthcare; Universal health coverage; Sub-Saharan Africa; HEALTH-CARE; ESSENTIAL DRUGS;
D O I
10.1186/s12961-021-00724-y
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Lack of access to essential medicines presents a significant threat to achieving universal health coverage (UHC) in sub-Saharan Africa. Although it is acknowledged that essential medicines policies do not rise and stay on the policy agenda solely through rational deliberation and consideration of technical merits, policy theory is rarely used to direct and guide analysis to inform future policy implementation. We used Kingdon's model to analyse agenda setting for essential medicines policy in sub-Saharan Africa during the formative phase of the primary healthcare (PHC) concept. Methods We retrospectively analysed 49 published articles and 11 policy documents. We used selected search terms in EMBASE and MEDLINE electronic databases to identify relevant published studies. Policy documents were obtained through hand searching of selected websites. We also reviewed the timeline of essential medicines policy milestones contained in the Flagship Report, Medicines in Health Systems: Advancing access, affordability and appropriate use, released by WHO in 2014. Kingdon's model was used as a lens to interpret the findings. Results We found that unsustainable rise in drug expenditure, inequitable access to drugs and irrational use of drugs were considered as problems in the mid-1970s. As a policy response, the essential drugs concept was introduced. A window of opportunity presented when provision of essential drugs was identified as one of the eight components of PHC. During implementation, policy contradictions emerged as political and policy actors framed the problems and perceived the effectiveness of policy responses in a manner that was amenable to their own interests and objectives. Conclusion We found that effective implementation of an essential medicines policy under PHC was constrained by prioritization of trade over public health in the politics stream, inadequate systems thinking in the policy stream and promotion of economic-oriented reforms in both the politics and policy streams. These lessons from the PHC era could prove useful in improving the approach to contemporary UHC policies.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]  
United Nations Population Fund, 1988, ANN REV POPUL LAW, V3, P292
[42]   Health systems frameworks in their political context: framing divergent agendas [J].
van Olmen, Josefien ;
Marchal, Bruno ;
Van Damme, Wim ;
Kegels, Guy ;
Hill, Peter S. .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 12
[43]   Access to care and medicines, burden of health care expenditures, and risk protection: Results from the World Health Survey [J].
Wagner, Anita K. ;
Graves, Amy Johnson ;
Reiss, Sheila K. ;
LeCates, Robert ;
Zhang, Fang ;
Ross-Degnan, Dennis .
HEALTH POLICY, 2011, 100 (2-3) :151-158
[44]  
WHO, 2019, Universal health coverage
[45]  
Wirtz VJ, 2017, LANCET, V389, P403, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31599-9
[46]  
World Health Organization, 1981, ACTION PROGRAMME ESS
[47]  
World Health Organization, 1977, The selection of essential drugs: report of a WHO expert committee
[48]  
World Health Organization, 1974, EX BOARD
[49]  
World Health Organization, 1975, 28 WORLD HLTH ASS RE
[50]  
World Health Organization, 1975, EX BOARD