Design thinking teaching and learning in higher education: Experiences across four universities

被引:16
作者
McLaughlin, Jacqueline E. [1 ]
Chen, Elizabeth [2 ,3 ]
Lake, Danielle [4 ]
Guo, Wen [5 ]
Skywark, Emily Rose [3 ]
Chernik, Aria [6 ,7 ]
Liu, Tsailu [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, UNC Eshelman Sch Pharm, Div Practice Adv & Clin Educ, Ctr Innovat Pharm Educ & Res, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Hlth Behav, UNC Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Off Vice Chancellor Innovat Entrepreneurship & Ec, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] Elon Univ, Ctr Design Thinking, Elon, NC USA
[5] Elon Univ, Dept Art, Elon, NC USA
[6] Duke Univ, Social Sci Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
[7] Duke Univ, Innovat & Entrepreneurship Initiat, Durham, NC USA
[8] North Carolina State Univ, Coll Design, Dept Graph Design & Ind Design, Raleigh, NC USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 03期
关键词
ENGINEERING DESIGN;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0265902
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A growing body of literature highlights the increasing demand on college graduates to possess the problem finding, problem framing, and problem-solving skills necessary to address complex real-world challenges. Design thinking (DT) is an iterative, human-centered approach to problem solving that synthesizes what is desirable, equitable, technologically feasible, and sustainable. As universities expand efforts to train students with DT mindsets and skills, we must assess faculty and student DT practices and outcomes to better understand DT course experiences. Understanding how DT is taught and experienced within higher education can help schools promote student learning and align their training programs with professional, personal, and civic needs. In this study, surveys were completed by 19 faculty and 196 students from 23 courses at four universities. DT teaching and learning was characterized by three DT practices and five outcomes. Statistically significant differences were found by discipline of study and student type (i.e., graduate vs undergraduate), but not by gender or race/ethnicity. These results can be used to inform the development of classroom-based DT teaching and learning strategies across higher education institutions and disciplines.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 43 条
[11]  
CostanzaChock S, 2020, INFORM POL, P1
[12]   Experiential Learning From a Classroom Desk: Exploring Student Perceptions of Applied Coursework [J].
DeLuca, Jaime R. ;
Fornatora, Emily .
SPORT MANAGEMENT EDUCATION JOURNAL, 2020, 14 (02) :142-150
[13]  
DeVita J.M., 2016, INT J SCHOLARSHIP TE, V1, P145
[14]   Implementing design thinking in organizations: an exploratory study [J].
Dunne, David .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATION DESIGN, 2018, 7 (01)
[15]   Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning [J].
Dym, CL ;
Agogino, AM ;
Eris, O ;
Frey, DD ;
Leifer, LJ .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2005, 94 (01) :103-120
[16]  
Fallis G., 2013, Rethinking Higher Education
[17]  
Friedman Hershey., 2016, PSYCHOL ISSUE HUMAN, V4, P104, DOI [10.22381/PIHRM4220165, DOI 10.22381/PIHRM4220165]
[18]  
Friere Paulo., 1970, PEDAGOGY OPPRESSED
[19]  
Guo W, 2022, TEACH LEARN INQ
[20]  
Hoffman L, 2016, 10 MODELS DESIGN THI, P674