Deep Learning Classification of Cheatgrass Invasion in the Western United States Using Biophysical and Remote Sensing Data

被引:13
作者
Larson, Kyle B. [1 ]
Tuor, Aaron R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, Richland, WA 99352 USA
基金
美国能源部;
关键词
deep learning; machine learning; Random Forest; supervised classification; logistic regression; land cover classification; invasive species mapping; Landsat-7; MODIS; RANDOM FOREST CLASSIFIER; TIME-SERIES ANALYSIS; BROMUS-TECTORUM; LAND-COVER; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION; ANNUAL GRASSES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; MODEL; PLANT; PREDICTIONS;
D O I
10.3390/rs13071246
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) invasion is driving an emerging cycle of increased fire frequency and irreversible loss of wildlife habitat in the western US. Yet, detailed spatial information about its occurrence is still lacking for much of its presumably invaded range. Deep learning (DL) has demonstrated success for remote sensing applications but is less tested on more challenging tasks like identifying biological invasions using sub-pixel phenomena. We compare two DL architectures and the more conventional Random Forest and Logistic Regression methods to improve upon a previous effort to map cheatgrass occurrence at >2% canopy cover. High-dimensional sets of biophysical, MODIS, and Landsat-7 ETM+ predictor variables are also compared to evaluate different multi-modal data strategies. All model configurations improved results relative to the case study and accuracy generally improved by combining data from both sensors with biophysical data. Cheatgrass occurrence is mapped at 30 m ground sample distance (GSD) with an estimated 78.1% accuracy, compared to 250-m GSD and 71% map accuracy in the case study. Furthermore, DL is shown to be competitive with well-established machine learning methods in a limited data regime, suggesting it can be an effective tool for mapping biological invasions and more broadly for multi-modal remote sensing applications.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [31] How different are species distribution model predictions?-Application of a new measure of dissimilarity and level of significance to giant panda Ailuropoda melanoleuca
    Huang, Qiongyu
    Fleming, Christen H.
    Robb, Benjamin
    Lothspeich, Audrey
    Songer, Melissa
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2018, 46 : 114 - 124
  • [32] Ioffe S, 2015, PR MACH LEARN RES, V37, P448
  • [33] Kingma DP, 2015, C TRACK P
  • [34] Deep Learning Classification of Land Cover and Crop Types Using Remote Sensing Data
    Kussul, Nataliia
    Lavreniuk, Mykola
    Skakun, Sergii
    Shelestov, Andrii
    [J]. IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2017, 14 (05) : 778 - 782
  • [35] Machine learning in geosciences and remote sensing
    Lary, David J.
    Alavi, Amir H.
    Gandomi, Amir H.
    Walker, Annette L.
    [J]. GEOSCIENCE FRONTIERS, 2016, 7 (01) : 3 - 10
  • [36] Geospatial Big Data: Challenges and Opportunities
    Lee, Jae-Gil
    Kang, Minseo
    [J]. BIG DATA RESEARCH, 2015, 2 (02) : 74 - 81
  • [37] Deep neural network for remote-sensing image interpretation: status and perspectives
    Li, Jiayi
    Huang, Xin
    Gong, Jianya
    [J]. NATIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2019, 6 (06) : 1082 - +
  • [38] Deep learning for pixel-level image fusion: Recent advances and future prospects
    Liu, Yu
    Chen, Xun
    Wang, Zengfu
    Wang, Z. Jane
    Ward, Rabab K.
    Wang, Xuesong
    [J]. INFORMATION FUSION, 2018, 42 : 158 - 173
  • [39] Deep learning in remote sensing applications: A meta-analysis and review
    Ma, Lei
    Liu, Yu
    Zhang, Xueliang
    Ye, Yuanxin
    Yin, Gaofei
    Johnson, Brian Alan
    [J]. ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 152 : 166 - 177
  • [40] Mack RN, 2011, FIFTY YEARS OF INVASION ECOLOGY: THE LEGACY OF CHARLES ELTON, P253