Missed breast cancers at US-guided core needle biopsy: How to reduce them

被引:120
作者
Youk, Ji Hyun [1 ]
Kim, Eun-Kyung [1 ]
Kim, Min Jung [1 ]
Lee, Ji Young [1 ]
Oh, Ki Keun [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Res Inst Radiol Sci, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Seoul 120752, South Korea
关键词
D O I
10.1148/rg.271065029
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Ultrasonographically (US) guided core needle biopsy is currently recognized as a reliable alternative to surgical biopsy for the histopathologic diagnosis of breast lesions. However, despite advances in biopsy devices and techniques, false-negative diagnoses are unavoidable and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. The most common reasons for false-negative diagnosis are ( a) technical or sampling errors, (b) failure to recognize or act on radiologic-histologic discordance, and ( c) lack of imaging follow-up after a benign biopsy result. Technical difficulties (eg, poor lesion or needle visualization, deeply located lesions, dense fibrotic tissue) cause inaccurate sampling but can be reduced by using modified standard techniques. Radiologic-histologic correlation is also of critical importance in US-guided core needle biopsy. Radiologic-histologic discordance occurs when the histologic results do not provide a sufficient explanation for the imaging features and indicates that the lesion may not have been sampled adequately, so that repeat biopsy is warranted. Appropriate follow-up imaging is invaluable; even patients with concordant benign findings after US-guided core needle biopsy are directed to undergo follow-up imaging because there may be delays in the recognition of false-negative findings. Optimization of technique, radiologic-histologic correlation, and postbiopsy follow-up protocols are recommended to reduce the occurrence of false-negative diagnosis at US-guided core needle biopsy performed by radiologists.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / U9
页数:17
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Berg W., 2003, AM J ROENTGENOL, V180, P10
  • [2] Lessons from mammographic-histopathologic correlation of large-core needle breast biopsy
    Berg, WA
    Hruban, RH
    Kumar, D
    Singh, HR
    Brem, RF
    Gatewood, OMB
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 1996, 16 (05) : 1111 - 1130
  • [3] Predictive value of specimen radiography for core needle biopsy of noncalcified breast masses
    Berg, WA
    Jaeger, B
    Campassi, C
    Kumar, D
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 171 (06) : 1671 - 1678
  • [4] Image-guided breast biopsy and management of high-risk lesions
    Berg, WA
    [J]. RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2004, 42 (05) : 935 - +
  • [5] Stereotactic core-needle breast biopsy: A multi-institutional prospective trial
    Brenner, RJ
    Bassett, LW
    Fajardo, LL
    Dershaw, DD
    Evans, WP
    Hunt, R
    Lee, C
    Tocino, I
    Fisher, P
    McCombs, M
    Jackson, VP
    Feig, SA
    Mendelson, EB
    Margolin, FR
    Bird, R
    Sayre, J
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2001, 218 (03) : 866 - 872
  • [6] Buchberger W, 2002, RADIOLOGE, V42, P25, DOI 10.1007/s117-002-8113-9
  • [7] Needle choice for sonographically guided core biopsy.
    Cardenosa, G
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 173 (03) : 845 - 846
  • [8] CARDENOSA G, 2004, CORE CURRICULUM BREA, P382
  • [9] Sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast: Comparison of 14-gauge automated gun and 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy methods
    Cho, N
    Moon, WK
    Cha, JH
    Kim, SM
    Kim, SJ
    Lee, SH
    Chung, HK
    Cho, KS
    Park, IA
    Noh, DY
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 6 (02) : 102 - 109
  • [10] COMSTOCK CE, 2005, 2005 SYLLABUS CATEGO, P155