Turkish validity and reliability study for the person-centered maternity care scale

被引:9
作者
Ozsahin, Zeliha [1 ]
Altiparmak, Sumeyye [1 ]
Aksoy Derya, Yesim [1 ]
Kayhan Tetik, Burcu [2 ]
Inceoglu, Feyza [3 ]
机构
[1] Inonu Univ, Dept Midwifery, Fac Hlth Sci, TR-44280 Malatya, Turkey
[2] Inonu Univ, Dept Family Med, Med Fac, Malatya, Turkey
[3] Malatya Turgut Ozal Univ, Dept Biostat, Med Fac, Malatya, Turkey
关键词
maternity care; PCMC; person-centered care; person-centered maternity care scale; reliability and validity; Turkish adaptation; QUALITY-OF-CARE;
D O I
10.1111/jog.14913
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aim The objective was to adapt the person-centered maternity care scale (PCMCS) developed by Afulani et al. in 2017 to Turkish and to perform the validity and reliability study of this scale. Methods The population of this methodological study consisted of 280 mothers who were referred to the postpartum service of a public hospital in eastern Turkey. Linguistic validity, context validity, and pilot practice studies regarding the PCMCS that could be used in the first nine postpartum weeks were performed. Explanatory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were performed to assess the construct validity of the form. Reliability of PCMCS was tested through the Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient, total item correlation, and test-retest analysis. Results The Turkish version of the PCMCS a 21-item scale with three sub-dimensions was obtained. These three sub-dimensions found as a result of explanatory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis supported the scale structure. Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient scale was adequate for total and sub-dimensions. Conclusion Turkish version of PCMCS was found to be a valid and reliable instrument to be used for assessing the person-centered maternity care for women in the postpartum period.
引用
收藏
页码:3211 / 3222
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [11] The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review
    Bohren, Meghan A.
    Vogel, Joshua P.
    Hunter, Erin C.
    Lutsiv, Olha
    Makh, Suprita K.
    Souza, Joao Paulo
    Aguiar, Carolina
    Coneglian, Fernando Saraiva
    Luiz, Alex
    Diniz, Araujo
    Tuncalp, Oezge
    Javadi, Dena
    Oladapo, Olufemi T.
    Khosla, Rajat
    Hindin, Michelle J.
    Guelmezoglu, A. Metin
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2015, 12 (06)
  • [12] Bowling A, 2005, Handbook of Health Research Methods: Investigation, Measurement and Analysis. Investigation, Measurement and Analysis
  • [13] Disrespectful intrapartum care during facility-based delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis of women's perceptions and experiences
    Bradley, Susan
    McCourt, Christine
    Rayment, Juliet
    Parmar, Divya
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2016, 169 : 157 - 170
  • [14] THE ROLE OF FACTOR-ANALYSIS IN THE DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF PERSONALITY-SCALES
    BRIGGS, SR
    CHEEK, JM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 1986, 54 (01) : 106 - 148
  • [15] Buyukozturk S., 2002, Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yonetimi, P470, DOI DOI 10.26650/FNJN397481
  • [16] Civelek M. E., 2018, Essentials of structural equation modeling
  • [17] Patient-centered Care in Maternity Services: A Critical Appraisal and Synthesis of the Literature
    de Labrusse, Claire
    Ramelet, Anne-Sylvie
    Humphrey, Tracy
    Maclennan, Sara J.
    [J]. WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 2016, 26 (01) : 100 - 109
  • [18] Freeze J, 2018, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 51ST ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES (HICSS), P913
  • [19] Gliem J., 2003, P MIDWEST RESEARCHTO
  • [20] Gozum S., 2003, HEMSIRELIK ARASTIRMA, V5, P3